IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i5p1732-d758741.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deriving Current Cost Requirements from Future Targets: Case Studies for Emerging Offshore Renewable Energy Technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Shona Pennock

    (School of Engineering, Institute for Energy Systems, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3DW, UK)

  • Anna Garcia-Teruel

    (School of Engineering, Institute for Energy Systems, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3DW, UK)

  • Donald R. Noble

    (School of Engineering, Institute for Energy Systems, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3DW, UK)

  • Owain Roberts

    (School of Engineering, Institute for Energy Systems, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3DW, UK)

  • Adrian de Andres

    (School of Engineering, Institute for Energy Systems, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3DW, UK)

  • Charlotte Cochrane

    (School of Engineering, Institute for Energy Systems, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3DW, UK)

  • Henry Jeffrey

    (School of Engineering, Institute for Energy Systems, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3DW, UK)

Abstract

This work investigates potential cost reduction trajectories of three emerging offshore renewable energy technologies (floating offshore wind, tidal stream, and wave) with respect to meeting ambitious cost targets set out in the Strategic Energy Technology Implementation Plans (SET-Plans) for Offshore Wind and Ocean Energy. A methodology is presented which calculates target costs for current early-stage devices, starting from the 2030 SET-Plan levelised cost targets. Component-based experience curves have been applied as part of the methodology, characterised through the comparative maturity level of each technology-specific cost centre. The resultant early-stage target costs are then compared with actual costs for current devices to highlight where further cost reduction is still required. It has been found that innovation and development requirements to reach these targets vary greatly between different technologies, based on their current level of technological maturity. Future funding calls and programmes should be designed with these variables in mind to support innovative developments in offshore renewables. The method presented in this paper has been applied to publicly available cost data for emerging renewable technologies and is fully adaptable to calculate the innovation requirements for specific early-stage renewable energy devices.

Suggested Citation

  • Shona Pennock & Anna Garcia-Teruel & Donald R. Noble & Owain Roberts & Adrian de Andres & Charlotte Cochrane & Henry Jeffrey, 2022. "Deriving Current Cost Requirements from Future Targets: Case Studies for Emerging Offshore Renewable Energy Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:5:p:1732-:d:758741
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/5/1732/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/5/1732/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tooraj Jamasb, 2007. "Technical Change Theory and Learning Curves: Patterns of Progress in Electricity Generation Technologies," The Energy Journal, , vol. 28(3), pages 51-72, July.
    2. Myhr, Anders & Bjerkseter, Catho & Ågotnes, Anders & Nygaard, Tor A., 2014. "Levelised cost of energy for offshore floating wind turbines in a life cycle perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 714-728.
    3. Guanche, R. & de Andrés, A.D. & Simal, P.D. & Vidal, C. & Losada, I.J., 2014. "Uncertainty analysis of wave energy farms financial indicators," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 570-580.
    4. Rinaldi, Giovanni & Garcia-Teruel, Anna & Jeffrey, Henry & Thies, Philipp R. & Johanning, Lars, 2021. "Incorporating stochastic operation and maintenance models into the techno-economic analysis of floating offshore wind farms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    5. Yeh, Sonia & Rubin, Edward S., 2012. "A review of uncertainties in technology experience curves," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 762-771.
    6. Tianna Bloise Thomaz & David Crooks & Encarni Medina-Lopez & Leonore van Velzen & Henry Jeffrey & Joseba Lopez Mendia & Raul Rodriguez Arias & Pablo Ruiz Minguela, 2019. "O&M Models for Ocean Energy Converters: Calibrating through Real Sea Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-20, June.
    7. O'Connor, M. & Lewis, T. & Dalton, G., 2013. "Operational expenditure costs for wave energy projects and impacts on financial returns," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1119-1131.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pablo Ruiz-Minguela & Donald R. Noble & Vincenzo Nava & Shona Pennock & Jesus M. Blanco & Henry Jeffrey, 2022. "Estimating Future Costs of Emerging Wave Energy Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Enrico Giglio & Ermando Petracca & Bruno Paduano & Claudio Moscoloni & Giuseppe Giorgi & Sergej Antonello Sirigu, 2023. "Estimating the Cost of Wave Energy Converters at an Early Design Stage: A Bottom-Up Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-39, April.
    3. Ferreira, D.N. & Gato, L.M.C. & Eça, L., 2023. "Efficiency of biradial impulse turbines concerning rotor blade angle, guide-vane deflection and blockage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    4. Chenglong Guo & Wanan Sheng & Dakshina G. De Silva & George Aggidis, 2023. "A Review of the Levelized Cost of Wave Energy Based on a Techno-Economic Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-30, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chenglong Guo & Wanan Sheng & Dakshina G. De Silva & George Aggidis, 2023. "A Review of the Levelized Cost of Wave Energy Based on a Techno-Economic Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-30, February.
    2. Pennock, Shona & Vanegas-Cantarero, María M. & Bloise-Thomaz, Tianna & Jeffrey, Henry & Dickson, Matthew J., 2022. "Life cycle assessment of a point-absorber wave energy array," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1078-1088.
    3. Ophelie Choupin & Michael Henriksen & Amir Etemad-Shahidi & Rodger Tomlinson, 2021. "Breaking-Down and Parameterising Wave Energy Converter Costs Using the CapEx and Similitude Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-27, February.
    4. Aksel Botne Sandberg & Eirik Klementsen & Gerrit Muller & Adrian De Andres & Jéromine Maillet, 2016. "Critical Factors Influencing Viability of Wave Energy Converters in Off-Grid Luxury Resorts and Small Utilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Adrian De Andres & Jéromine Maillet & Jørgen Hals Todalshaug & Patrik Möller & David Bould & Henry Jeffrey, 2016. "Techno-Economic Related Metrics for a Wave Energy Converters Feasibility Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Tianna Bloise Thomaz & David Crooks & Encarni Medina-Lopez & Leonore van Velzen & Henry Jeffrey & Joseba Lopez Mendia & Raul Rodriguez Arias & Pablo Ruiz Minguela, 2019. "O&M Models for Ocean Energy Converters: Calibrating through Real Sea Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-20, June.
    7. Delpey, Matthias & Lastiri, Ximun & Abadie, Stéphane & Roeber, Volker & Maron, Philippe & Liria, Pedro & Mader, Julien, 2021. "Characterization of the wave resource variability in the French Basque coastal area based on a high-resolution hindcast," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 79-95.
    8. Brooks, Sam & Mahmood, Minhal & Roy, Rajkumar & Manolesos, Marinos & Salonitis, Konstantinos, 2023. "Self-reconfiguration simulations of turbines to reduce uneven farm degradation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1301-1314.
    9. Astariz, S. & Iglesias, G., 2015. "The economics of wave energy: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 397-408.
    10. Strupeit, Lars, 2017. "An innovation system perspective on the drivers of soft cost reduction for photovoltaic deployment: The case of Germany," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 273-286.
    11. Tunde Aderinto & Hua Li, 2018. "Ocean Wave Energy Converters: Status and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-26, May.
    12. Narbel, Patrick André & Hansen, Jan Petter, 2014. "Estimating the cost of future global energy supply," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 91-97.
    13. Schauf, Magnus & Schwenen, Sebastian, 2021. "Mills of progress grind slowly? Estimating learning rates for onshore wind energy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    14. Hernandez-Negron, Christian G. & Baker, Erin & Goldstein, Anna P., 2023. "A hypothesis for experience curves of related technologies with an application to wind energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    15. Mauleón, Ignacio, 2016. "Photovoltaic learning rate estimation: Issues and implications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 507-524.
    16. Rubin, Edward S. & Azevedo, Inês M.L. & Jaramillo, Paulina & Yeh, Sonia, 2015. "A review of learning rates for electricity supply technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 198-218.
    17. Odam, Neil & de Vries, Frans P., 2020. "Innovation modelling and multi-factor learning in wind energy technology," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    18. López-Ruiz, Alejandro & Bergillos, Rafael J. & Ortega-Sánchez, Miguel, 2016. "The importance of wave climate forecasting on the decision-making process for nearshore wave energy exploitation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 191-203.
    19. Garcia-Teruel, Anna & Rinaldi, Giovanni & Thies, Philipp R. & Johanning, Lars & Jeffrey, Henry, 2022. "Life cycle assessment of floating offshore wind farms: An evaluation of operation and maintenance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    20. Bossink, Bart, 2020. "Learning strategies in sustainable energy demonstration projects: What organizations learn from sustainable energy demonstrations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:5:p:1732-:d:758741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.