IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i4p1268-d745470.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship Analysis and Optimisation of Space Layout to Improve the Energy Performance of Office Buildings

Author

Listed:
  • Tiantian Du

    (China National Engineering Research Center for Human Settlement, China Architecture Design and Research Group, Beijing 100044, China
    School of Architecture, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
    Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BZ Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Michela Turrin

    (Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BZ Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Sabine Jansen

    (Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BZ Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Andy van den Dobbelsteen

    (Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BZ Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Francesco De Luca

    (Academy of Architecture and Urban Studies, Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Tallinn University of Technology, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia)

Abstract

Architectural space layout has proven to be influential on building energy performance. However, the relationship between different space layouts and their consequent energy demands has not yet been systematically studied. This study thoroughly investigates such a relationship. In order to do so, a computational method was developed, which includes a method to generate space layouts featuring energy-related variables and an assessment method for energy demand. Additionally, a design of experiments was performed, and its results were used to analyse the relationship between space layouts and energy demands. In order to identify their relationship, four types of design indicators of space layout were proposed, both for the overall layout and for each function. Finally, several optimisations were performed to minimise heating, cooling and lighting demands. The optimisation results showed that the maximum reduction between different layouts was up to 54% for lighting demand, 51% for heating demand and 38% for cooling demand. The relationship analysis shows that when comparing the four types of design indicators, the façade area-to-floor area ratio showed a stronger correlation with energy demands than the façade area ratio, floor area ratio and height-to-depth ratio. Overall, this study shows that designing a space layout helps to reduce energy demands for heating, cooling and lighting, and also provides a reference for other researchers and designers to optimise space layout with improved energy performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiantian Du & Michela Turrin & Sabine Jansen & Andy van den Dobbelsteen & Francesco De Luca, 2022. "Relationship Analysis and Optimisation of Space Layout to Improve the Energy Performance of Office Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:4:p:1268-:d:745470
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/4/1268/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/4/1268/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evins, Ralph, 2013. "A review of computational optimisation methods applied to sustainable building design," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 230-245.
    2. Ramos, Greici & Ghisi, Enedir, 2010. "Analysis of daylight calculated using the EnergyPlus programme," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(7), pages 1948-1958, September.
    3. Zhang, Shufan & Ma, Minda & Li, Kai & Ma, Zhili & Feng, Wei & Cai, Weiguang, 2022. "Historical carbon abatement in the commercial building operation: China versus the US," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benedek Kiss & Jose Dinis Silvestre & Rita Andrade Santos & Zsuzsa Szalay, 2021. "Environmental and Economic Optimisation of Buildings in Portugal and Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Guariso, Giorgio & Sangiorgio, Matteo, 2019. "Multi-objective planning of building stock renovation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 101-110.
    3. Waibel, Christoph & Evins, Ralph & Carmeliet, Jan, 2019. "Co-simulation and optimization of building geometry and multi-energy systems: Interdependencies in energy supply, energy demand and solar potentials," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1661-1682.
    4. Jiang, Hong-Dian & Pradhan, Basanta K. & Dong, Kangyin & Yu, Yan-Yan & Liang, Qiao-Mei, 2024. "An economy-wide impacts of multiple mitigation pathways toward carbon neutrality in China: A CGE-based analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    5. Zou, Chenchen & Ma, Minda & Zhou, Nan & Feng, Wei & You, Kairui & Zhang, Shufan, 2023. "Toward carbon free by 2060: A decarbonization roadmap of operational residential buildings in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    6. Østergård, Torben & Jensen, Rasmus Lund & Maagaard, Steffen Enersen, 2018. "A comparison of six metamodeling techniques applied to building performance simulations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 89-103.
    7. Singh, Ramkishore & Lazarus, I.J. & Kishore, V.V.N., 2015. "Effect of internal woven roller shade and glazing on the energy and daylighting performances of an office building in the cold climate of Shillong," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 317-333.
    8. García Kerdan, Iván & Raslan, Rokia & Ruyssevelt, Paul & Morillón Gálvez, David, 2017. "A comparison of an energy/economic-based against an exergoeconomic-based multi-objective optimisation for low carbon building energy design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 244-263.
    9. Cristina Brunelli & Francesco Castellani & Alberto Garinei & Lorenzo Biondi & Marcello Marconi, 2016. "A Procedure to Perform Multi-Objective Optimization for Sustainable Design of Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, November.
    10. Nayara R. M. Sakiyama & Joyce C. Carlo & Leonardo Mazzaferro & Harald Garrecht, 2021. "Building Optimization through a Parametric Design Platform: Using Sensitivity Analysis to Improve a Radial-Based Algorithm Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, May.
    11. Zheng, Xuyue & Wu, Guoce & Qiu, Yuwei & Zhan, Xiangyan & Shah, Nilay & Li, Ning & Zhao, Yingru, 2018. "A MINLP multi-objective optimization model for operational planning of a case study CCHP system in urban China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 1126-1140.
    12. Alaia Sola & Cristina Corchero & Jaume Salom & Manel Sanmarti, 2018. "Simulation Tools to Build Urban-Scale Energy Models: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-24, November.
    13. De Boeck, L. & Verbeke, S. & Audenaert, A. & De Mesmaeker, L., 2015. "Improving the energy performance of residential buildings: A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 960-975.
    14. Golpîra, Hêriş & Khan, Syed Abdul Rehman, 2019. "A multi-objective risk-based robust optimization approach to energy management in smart residential buildings under combined demand and supply uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1113-1129.
    15. Evins, Ralph, 2015. "Multi-level optimization of building design, energy system sizing and operation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1775-1789.
    16. Antonio Paone & Jean-Philippe Bacher, 2018. "The Impact of Building Occupant Behavior on Energy Efficiency and Methods to Influence It: A Review of the State of the Art," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, April.
    17. Enescu, Diana, 2017. "A review of thermal comfort models and indicators for indoor environments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1353-1379.
    18. Eleftheria Touloupaki & Theodoros Theodosiou, 2017. "Performance Simulation Integrated in Parametric 3D Modeling as a Method for Early Stage Design Optimization—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    19. Forde, Joe & Hopfe, Christina J. & McLeod, Robert S. & Evins, Ralph, 2020. "Temporal optimization for affordable and resilient Passivhaus dwellings in the social housing sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    20. Harkouss, Fatima & Fardoun, Farouk & Biwole, Pascal Henry, 2018. "Passive design optimization of low energy buildings in different climates," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 591-613.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:4:p:1268-:d:745470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.