Author
Listed:
- Philipp Clement
(Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Economic Sciences, Institute of Automotive Engineering, Graz University of Technology, 8010 Graz, Austria
AVL List GmbH, Hans-List-Platz 1, 8020 Graz, Austria
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Omar Veledar
(AVL List GmbH, Hans-List-Platz 1, 8020 Graz, Austria
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Clemens Könczöl
(Faculty of Natural Sciences, Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Herbert Danzinger
(AVL List GmbH, Hans-List-Platz 1, 8020 Graz, Austria)
- Markus Posch
(AVL List GmbH, Hans-List-Platz 1, 8020 Graz, Austria)
- Arno Eichberger
(Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Economic Sciences, Institute of Automotive Engineering, Graz University of Technology, 8010 Graz, Austria)
- Georg Macher
(Faculty of Electrical and Information Engineering, Institute of Technical Informatics, Graz University of Technology, 8010 Graz, Austria)
Abstract
As vehicle driving evolves from human-controlled to autonomous, human–machine interaction ensures intuitive usage as well as the feedback from vehicle occupants to the machine for optimising controls. The feedback also improves understanding of the user satisfaction with the system behaviour, which is crucial for determining user trust and, hence, the acceptance of the new functionalities that aim to improve mobility solutions and increase road safety. Trust and acceptance are potentially the crucial parameters for determining the success of autonomous driving deployment in wider society. Hence, there is a need to define appropriate and measurable parameters to be able to quantify trust and acceptance in a physically safe environment using dependable methods. This study seeks to support technical developments and data gathering with psychology to determine the degree to which humans trust automated driving functionalities. The primary aim is to define if the usage of an advanced driving simulator can improve consumer trust and acceptance of driving automation through tailor-made studies. We also seek to measure significant differences in responses from different demographic groups. The study employs tailor-made driving scenarios to gather feedback on trust, usability and user workload of 55 participants monitoring the vehicle behaviour and environment during the automated drive. Participants’ subjective ratings are gathered before and after the simulator session. Results show a significant increase in trust ensuing the exposure to the driving automation functionalities. We quantify this increase resulting from the usage of the driving simulator. Those less experienced with driving automation show a higher increase in trust and, therefore, profit more from the exercise. This appears to be linked to the demanded participant workload, as we establish a link between workload and trust. The findings provide a noteworthy contribution to quantifying the method of evaluating and ensuring user acceptance of driving automation. It is only through the increase of trust and consequent improvement of user acceptance that the introduction of the driving automation into wider society will be a guaranteed success.
Suggested Citation
Philipp Clement & Omar Veledar & Clemens Könczöl & Herbert Danzinger & Markus Posch & Arno Eichberger & Georg Macher, 2022.
"Enhancing Acceptance and Trust in Automated Driving trough Virtual Experience on a Driving Simulator,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:781-:d:730483
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:781-:d:730483. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.