IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i3p1107-d740843.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance Analysis and Comparative Study of a 467.2 kWp Grid-Interactive SPV System: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad Faiz Minai

    (Electrical Engineering Department, Integral University, Lucknow 226026, India)

  • Tahsin Usmani

    (Electronics and Communication Engineering Department, Integral University, Lucknow 226026, India)

  • Majed A. Alotaibi

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Hasmat Malik

    (BEARS, NUS Campus, University Town, Singapore 138602, Singapore)

  • Mohammed E. Nassar

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada)

Abstract

This paper demonstrates the investigation of the acquired outcomes from consistent information observing a 467.2 kWp solar photovoltaic (SPV) framework commissioned on the roofs of three separate high-rise buildings, which are located at the location of 26.9585° N and 80.9992° E. Onside real-time performance for this system was investigated for three years, 2018–2020; this system contains 1460 SPV panels of 320 Wp each, having 20 PV panels per string, 09 DC/AC power conditioning units (PCU), and a SCADA (supervisory control and data acquisition) system for monitoring the other necessary parts of a grid-interactive SPV system. The outcomes of the different buildings are compared with each other to analyze the power output at the same input conditions. Hardware components of the plants with approximately the same ratings (P 2 ~ 108.8 kWp + P 3 ~ 128 kWp) are compared (with P 1 ~ 230.4 kWp). Simulation modeling of the year 2020 in PVsyst tool for generated energy, Performance Ratio (PR), and Capacity Utilization Factor (CUF) are carried out additionally and compared with the installed rooftop grid-interactive SPV system of 467.2 kWp (~P 1 + P 2 + P 3 ) at the site. Numerous performance parameters such as array efficiency, inverter efficiency, system efficiency, Performance Ratio (PR), and Capacity Utilization Factor (CUF) of the plant are evaluated and compared with already installed systems in different regions of the world. These points demonstrate great feedback to framework architects, workers, designers, and energy suppliers regarding the genuine limit and plausibility of the framework they can offer to clients. Moreover, one of the environmental benefits of the SPV plant is that the 467.2 kWp PV framework reduces the tremendous measure of CO 2 , SO 2 , and NO X that is discharged into the air.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad Faiz Minai & Tahsin Usmani & Majed A. Alotaibi & Hasmat Malik & Mohammed E. Nassar, 2022. "Performance Analysis and Comparative Study of a 467.2 kWp Grid-Interactive SPV System: A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:1107-:d:740843
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/1107/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/1107/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahmed, Saeed & Mahmood, Anzar & Hasan, Ahmad & Sidhu, Guftaar Ahmad Sardar & Butt, Muhammad Fasih Uddin, 2016. "A comparative review of China, India and Pakistan renewable energy sectors and sharing opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 216-225.
    2. Erdinc, O. & Uzunoglu, M., 2012. "Optimum design of hybrid renewable energy systems: Overview of different approaches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 1412-1425.
    3. Sugathan, Vipinraj & John, Elsa & Sudhakar, K., 2015. "Recent improvements in dye sensitized solar cells: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 54-64.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adu-Poku, Akwasi & Koku Aidam, God'sable Sitsofe & Jackson, Godfrey Atta & N'tsoukpoe, Kokouvi Edem & Kponyo, Jerry John & Messan, Adamah & Ikonne, Ozioma & Kwarteng, Wofa & Kemausuor, Francis, 2023. "Performance assessment and resilience of solar mini-grids for sustainable energy access in Ghana," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    2. Kapsalis, Vasileios & Maduta, Carmen & Skandalos, Nikolaos & Wang, Meng & Bhuvad, Sushant Suresh & D'Agostino, Delia & Ma, Tao & Raj, Uday & Parker, Danny & Peng, Jinqing & Karamanis, Dimitris, 2024. "Critical assessment of large-scale rooftop photovoltaics deployment in the global urban environment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PB).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kyriakopoulos, Grigorios L. & Arabatzis, Garyfallos & Tsialis, Panagiotis & Ioannou, Konstantinos, 2018. "Electricity consumption and RES plants in Greece: Typologies of regional units," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 134-144.
    2. Wang, Jingxing & Chung, Seokhyun & AlShelahi, Abdullah & Kontar, Raed & Byon, Eunshin & Saigal, Romesh, 2021. "Look-ahead decision making for renewable energy: A dynamic “predict and store” approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    3. Maddah, Hisham A. & Aryadwita, Lila & Berry, Vikas & Behura, Sanjay K., 2021. "Perovskite semiconductor-engineered cascaded molecular energy levels in naturally-sensitized photoanodes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    4. Al Busaidi, Ahmed Said & Kazem, Hussein A & Al-Badi, Abdullah H & Farooq Khan, Mohammad, 2016. "A review of optimum sizing of hybrid PV–Wind renewable energy systems in oman," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 185-193.
    5. Maqbool, Rashid, 2018. "Efficiency and effectiveness of factors affecting renewable energy projects; an empirical perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 944-956.
    6. Bernardos, Eva & López, Ignacio & Rodríguez, Javier & Abánades, Alberto, 2013. "Assessing the potential of hybrid fossil–solar thermal plants for energy policy making: Brayton cycles," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 99-106.
    7. García-Villoria, Alberto & Domenech, Bruno & Ferrer-Martí, Laia & Juanpera, Marc & Pastor, Rafael, 2020. "Ad-hoc heuristic for design of wind-photovoltaic electrification systems, including management constraints," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    8. M. Rambabu & G. V. Nagesh Kumar & S. Sivanagaraju, 2019. "Optimal Power Flow of Integrated Renewable Energy System using a Thyristor Controlled SeriesCompensator and a Grey-Wolf Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, June.
    9. Liu, Zhengxuan & Zhou, Yuekuan & Yan, Jun & Tostado-Véliz, Marcos, 2023. "Frontier ocean thermal/power and solar PV systems for transformation towards net-zero communities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    10. Kumar, Sandeep & Nehra, Monika & Deep, Akash & Kedia, Deepak & Dilbaghi, Neeraj & Kim, Ki-Hyun, 2017. "Quantum-sized nanomaterials for solar cell applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 821-839.
    11. Ummartyotin, S. & Bunnak, N. & Manuspiya, H., 2016. "A comprehensive review on modified clay based composite for energy based materials," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 466-472.
    12. Nithya Saiprasad & Akhtar Kalam & Aladin Zayegh, 2019. "Triple Bottom Line Analysis and Optimum Sizing of Renewable Energy Using Improved Hybrid Optimization Employing the Genetic Algorithm: A Case Study from India," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, January.
    13. Devadiga, Dheeraj & Selvakumar, Muthu & Shetty, Prakasha & Santosh, Mysore Sridhar, 2022. "The integration of flexible dye-sensitized solar cells and storage devices towards wearable self-charging power systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    14. Jha, Sunil Kr. & Bilalovic, Jasmin & Jha, Anju & Patel, Nilesh & Zhang, Han, 2017. "Renewable energy: Present research and future scope of Artificial Intelligence," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 297-317.
    15. Zejun Yu & Yao Wang & Bin Zhao & Zhixin Li & Qingli Hao, 2023. "Research on Carbon Emission Structure and Model in Low-Carbon Rural Areas: Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
    16. Hosseinnezhad, Mozhgan & Gharanjig, Kamaladin & Moradian, Siamak & Saeb, Mohammad Reza, 2017. "In quest of power conversion efficiency in nature-inspired dye-sensitized solar cells: Individual, co-sensitized or tandem configuration?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 864-870.
    17. Andrea A. Eras-Almeida & Miguel A. Egido-Aguilera & Philipp Blechinger & Sarah Berendes & Estefanía Caamaño & Enrique García-Alcalde, 2020. "Decarbonizing the Galapagos Islands: Techno-Economic Perspectives for the Hybrid Renewable Mini-Grid Baltra–Santa Cruz," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-47, March.
    18. Chakrabarti, Mohammed Harun & Mjalli, Farouq Sabri & AlNashef, Inas Muen & Hashim, Mohd. Ali & Hussain, Mohd. Azlan & Bahadori, Laleh & Low, Chee Tong John, 2014. "Prospects of applying ionic liquids and deep eutectic solvents for renewable energy storage by means of redox flow batteries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 254-270.
    19. Ahmad, Riaz & Murtaza, Ali F. & Sher, Hadeed Ahmed, 2019. "Power tracking techniques for efficient operation of photovoltaic array in solar applications – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 82-102.
    20. Fahd A. Alturki & Emad Mahrous Awwad, 2021. "Sizing and Cost Minimization of Standalone Hybrid WT/PV/Biomass/Pump-Hydro Storage-Based Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-20, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:1107-:d:740843. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.