IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i3p1053-d739221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Natural Gas Scarcity Risk for Countries along the Belt and Road

Author

Listed:
  • Ruijin Du

    (Center of Energy Development and Environmental Protection, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Qi Wu

    (School of Mathematical Sciences, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Gaogao Dong

    (School of Mathematical Sciences, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Lixin Tian

    (Center of Energy Development and Environmental Protection, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
    School of Mathematical Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210042, China)

  • André L. M. Vilela

    (Física de Materiais, Universidade de Pernambuco, Recife 50720-001, Brazil
    Center for Polymer Studies and Department of Physics, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA)

  • Linfeng Zhao

    (The Physics Department, School of Arts & Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA)

  • Xiaoxia Zheng

    (School of Mathematical Sciences, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

Abstract

The rapid development of the Belt and Road economics has generated a considerable energy demand. Under the general trend of the global energy transition, natural gas resources are becoming the main driving force. The limited natural gas resources are posing a significant risk to economies, and this risk may also be transferred to other distant regions through economic trade. The aim of this study is to explore the trans-regional (sectoral) transmission pattern of natural gas scarcity risk. The main contribution of this paper is the assessment of the local natural gas scarcity risk (LGSR) and cross-region transfer relationship of embodied natural gas scarcity risk (EGSR), which are evaluated for the BRI economies. In addition, the network amplification effect is considered when evaluating the cross-regional impact of natural gas scarcity risk. The results show that, at the national level, Turkey, Ukraine, and Bulgaria have significant EGSR related to exports activities. The natural gas scarcity risks (GSRs) originating from these countries are mainly transferred to Turkmenistan, Georgia, and Albania, with large EGSR imports. Moreover, by comparing the ranking changes of EGSR imports, EGSR exports, and LGSRs at the national and sectoral levels, countries or sectors with higher LGSRs also have higher EGSR exports. The Top EGSR import and export network consisting of top EGSR flow relationships can well reflect countries’ preferences in choosing EGSR transfer partners. The results suggest that upstream countries and sectors should strengthen cooperation to manage natural gas resources, and provide references for decision makers in highly vulnerable downstream countries and sectors to formulate strategies to avoid the large-scale spread of economic losses caused by natural gas scarcity.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruijin Du & Qi Wu & Gaogao Dong & Lixin Tian & André L. M. Vilela & Linfeng Zhao & Xiaoxia Zheng, 2022. "Natural Gas Scarcity Risk for Countries along the Belt and Road," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:1053-:d:739221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/1053/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/1053/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geng, Jiang-Bo & Ji, Qiang & Fan, Ying, 2014. "A dynamic analysis on global natural gas trade network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 23-33.
    2. Kan, S.Y. & Chen, B. & Wu, X.F. & Chen, Z.M. & Chen, G.Q., 2019. "Natural gas overview for world economy: From primary supply to final demand via global supply chains," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 215-225.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Han, Mengyao & Xiong, Jiao & Yang, Yu, 2023. "Comparisons between direct and embodied natural gas networks: Topology, dependency and vulnerability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    2. Kan, Siyi & Chen, Bin & Meng, Jing & Chen, Guoqian, 2020. "An extended overview of natural gas use embodied in world economy and supply chains: Policy implications from a time series analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    3. Wang, Wenya & Li, Zhenfu & Cheng, Xin, 2019. "Evolution of the global coal trade network: A complex network analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 496-506.
    4. Xu, Hai-Chuan & Wang, Zhi-Yuan & Jawadi, Fredj & Zhou, Wei-Xing, 2023. "Reconstruction of international energy trade networks with given marginal data: A comparative analysis," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    5. Sarvar Gurbanov, 2021. "Role of Natural Gas Consumption in the Reduction of CO 2 Emissions: Case of Azerbaijan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-14, November.
    6. Wadim Strielkowski & Anna Sherstobitova & Patrik Rovny & Tatiana Evteeva, 2021. "Increasing Energy Efficiency and Modernization of Energy Systems in Russia: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, May.
    7. Kong, Zhaoyang & Lu, Xi & Jiang, Qingzhe & Dong, Xiucheng & Liu, Guixian & Elbot, Noah & Zhang, Zhonghua & Chen, Shi, 2019. "Assessment of import risks for natural gas and its implication for optimal importing strategies: A case study of China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 11-18.
    8. Cai, Xiaomei & Liu, Chan & Zheng, Shuxian & Hu, Han & Tan, Zhanglu, 2023. "Analysis on the evolution characteristics of barite international trade pattern based on complex networks," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    9. Hao, Xiaoqing & An, Haizhong & Qi, Hai & Gao, Xiangyun, 2016. "Evolution of the exergy flow network embodied in the global fossil energy trade: Based on complex network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1515-1522.
    10. Sofia Dahlgren & Jonas Ammenberg, 2021. "Sustainability Assessment of Public Transport, Part II—Applying a Multi-Criteria Assessment Method to Compare Different Bus Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-30, January.
    11. Kitamura, Toshihiko & Managi, Shunsuke, 2017. "Driving force and resistance: Network feature in oil trade," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 361-375.
    12. Zhang, Guangyong & Jiang, Le & Tian, Lixin & Fu, Min, 2021. "Analysis of the gold fixing price fluctuation in different times based on the directed weighted networks," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    13. Lee, Joonseop & Lee, Dongyoung & Seo, Yongwon, 2021. "Experimental investigation of the exact role of large-molecule guest substances (LMGSs) in determining phase equilibria and structures of natural gas hydrates," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PB).
    14. Cao, Xuewen & Yang, Jian & Zhang, Yue & Gao, Song & Bian, Jiang, 2022. "Process optimization, exergy and economic analysis of boil-off gas re-liquefaction processes for LNG carriers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    15. Huan Chen & Lixin Tian & Minggang Wang & Zaili Zhen, 2017. "Analysis of the Dynamic Evolutionary Behavior of American Heating Oil Spot and Futures Price Fluctuation Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-29, April.
    16. Peng, Huaxi & Kan, Siyi & Meng, Jing & Li, Shuping & Cui, Can & Tan, Chang & Wang, Zhenyu & Wen, Quan & Guan, Dabo, 2024. "Emission accounting and drivers in South American countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    17. Cuilin Li & Ya-Juan Du & Qiang Ji & Jiang-bo Geng, 2019. "Multiscale Market Integration and Nonlinear Granger Causality between Natural Gas Futures and Physical Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-23, October.
    18. Su, Chi-Wei & Yuan, Xi & Umar, Muhammad & Chang, Tsangyao, 2022. "Dynamic price linkage of energies in transformation: Evidence from quantile connectedness," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    19. Bian, Jiang & Yang, Jian & Liu, Yang & Li, Yuxing & Cao, Xuewen, 2022. "Analysis and efficiency enhancement for energy-saving re-liquefaction processes of boil-off gas without external refrigeration cycle on LNG carriers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    20. Ning Lin & Robert E. Brooks, 2021. "Global Liquified Natural Gas Trade under Energy Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-30, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:1053-:d:739221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.