IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i24p9492-d1003395.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Sustainable Regional Development Policy on Carbon Emissions: Evidence from Yangtze River Delta of China

Author

Listed:
  • Jinxing Hu

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China)

  • Cuiying Shao

    (School of International Relations & Public Affairs, Fudan University, Shanghai 200062, China)

  • Zhaolong Zhang

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China)

Abstract

Urban agglomerations are becoming an increasingly important factor in advancing regional development and reshaping a new pattern of regional competition. However, few studies are focused on the impact of expanding urban agglomerations on reducing carbon emissions and its possible mechanism. Based on 285 city-level panel data from 2006 to 2017, this paper uses a staggered Difference-in-Differences (DID) model to explore the reduction effect and its possible mechanism of sustainable regional development policy, characterized by urban agglomeration expansion policy in the Yangtze River Delta, on carbon emissions with policy shocks in 2010 and 2013. The results are as follows: (1) The urban agglomeration expansion policy shows a significant marginal contribution to the reduction of carbon emissions, especially for the later joined (new) cities, and the reduction effect is particularly significant in the first and third years after the expansion, indicating that there are significant short-term and long-term reduction effects of the expansion policy. (2) The heterogeneities of reduction effect among three provinces are significant. Zhejiang Province enjoys the largest proportion carbon emission reduction effect, followed by Anhui and Jiangsu provinces. To be specific, urban agglomeration expansion in Zhejiang Province reduced carbon emissions and carbon emissions intensity in the overall, incumbent cities and new cities, while it only increased the total carbon emissions of the incumbent cities in Jiangsu province. (3) The heterogeneities of reduction effect brought by 2010 and 2013 are also significant. The urban agglomeration expansion policy in 2010 reduced carbon emissions on the whole cities and the incumbent cities with later joined cities excluded, while it had a significant reduction effect on the total, incumbent cities, and the new cities in 2013. (4) There are two possible mechanisms of this reduction effect. One is the strengthening of economic ties and enhanced environmental synergy between governments, called the market integration mechanism, which only has a significant effect on carbon emission reduction in the incumbent cities. Another is through the upgrade of the structure of regional industries, which has a significant effect in both the incumbent and new cities. These findings suggest that when formulating urban agglomerations polices, governments must take into account the carbon emissions effect, and advance the upgrading of industrial structure in the urban agglomeration.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinxing Hu & Cuiying Shao & Zhaolong Zhang, 2022. "The Impact of Sustainable Regional Development Policy on Carbon Emissions: Evidence from Yangtze River Delta of China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-25, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:24:p:9492-:d:1003395
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/24/9492/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/24/9492/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liangen Zeng & Chengming Li & Zhongqi Liang & Xuhai Zhao & Haoyu Hu & Xiao Wang & Dandan Yuan & Zhao Yu & Tingzhang Yang & Jingming Lu & Qi Huang & Fuyao Qu, 2022. "The Carbon Emission Intensity of Industrial Land in China: Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Driving Factors," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Raj Chetty & Adam Looney & Kory Kroft, 2009. "Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(4), pages 1145-1177, September.
    3. He, Weijun & Wang, Bo & Danish, & Wang, Zhaohua, 2018. "Will regional economic integration influence carbon dioxide marginal abatement costs? Evidence from Chinese panel data," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 263-274.
    4. Andreoni, V. & Galmarini, S., 2012. "Decoupling economic growth from carbon dioxide emissions: A decomposition analysis of Italian energy consumption," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 682-691.
    5. Qadir, Saeed & Dosmagambet, Yergali, 2020. "CAREC energy corridor: Opportunities, challenges, and IMPACT of regional energy trade integration on carbon emissions and energy access," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    6. Andersson, Fredrik N.G. & Karpestam, Peter, 2013. "CO2 emissions and economic activity: Short- and long-run economic determinants of scale, energy intensity and carbon intensity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1285-1294.
    7. Longji Zeng & Yuandi Wang & Yajuan Deng, 2022. "How Land Transactions Affect Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, May.
    8. Lai, Aolin & Wang, Qunwei & Cui, Lianbiao, 2022. "Can market segmentation lead to green paradox? Evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    9. Yang Yang & Fan He & Junping Ji & Xin Liu, 2022. "Peaking Carbon Emissions in a Megacity through Economic Restructuring: A Case Study of Shenzhen, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.
    10. Xueli Zhong & Xiaoshun Li & Yongfeng Li, 2022. "Urban Expansion and Carbon Emission Logistic Curve Hypothesis and Its Verification: A Case Study of Jiangsu Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, July.
    11. Shao, Ling & Li, Yuan & Feng, Kuishuang & Meng, Jing & Shan, Yuli & Guan, Dabo, 2018. "Carbon emission imbalances and the structural paths of Chinese regions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 396-404.
    12. Haining Luo & Yongsheng Qian & Junwei Zeng & Xuting Wei & Xiaoping Guang, 2022. "An Empirical Analysis of Logistics Corridors and Regional Economic Spatial Patterns from the Perspective of Compressive Transportation between Urban Agglomerations," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, May.
    13. Muntasir Murshed & Rizwan Ahmed & Chamaiporn Kumpamool & Mohga Bassim & Mohamed Elheddad, 2021. "The effects of regional trade integration and renewable energy transition on environmental quality: Evidence from South Asian neighbors," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 4154-4170, December.
    14. Qingyang Zhang & Xinyan Cai & Xiaoliang Liu & Xiaomei Yang & Zhihua Wang, 2022. "The Influence of Urbanization to the Outer Boundary Ecological Environment Using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques—A Case of the Greater Bay Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, August.
    15. Runde Gu & Chunfa Li & Dongdong Li & Yangyang Yang & Shan Gu, 2022. "The Impact of Rationalization and Upgrading of Industrial Structure on Carbon Emissions in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-16, June.
    16. Hengfei Huan & Yingming Zhu & Jishuang Liu, 2022. "A quasi‐natural experiment research regarding the impact of regional integration expansion in the Yangtze River Delta on foreign direct investment," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 1854-1876, December.
    17. Xiaolan Chen & Qinggang Meng & Jianing Shi & Yufei Liu & Jing Sun & Wanfang Shen, 2022. "Regional Differences and Convergence of Carbon Emissions Intensity in Cities along the Yellow River Basin in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, July.
    18. Canying Zeng & Shaohua Wu & Hua Zhou & Min Cheng, 2022. "The Impact of Urbanization Growth Patterns on Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Evidence from Guizhou, West of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
    19. Li, Jianglong & Lin, Boqiang, 2017. "Does energy and CO2 emissions performance of China benefit from regional integration?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 366-378.
    20. Kuokuo Zhao & Xuezhu Cui & Zhanhang Zhou & Peixuan Huang & Dongliang Li, 2021. "Exploring the Dependence and Influencing Factors of Carbon Emissions from the Perspective of Population Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-20, October.
    21. Jianshi Wang & Chengxin Wang & Shangkun Yu & Mengcheng Li & Yu Cheng, 2022. "Coupling Coordination and Spatiotemporal Evolution between Carbon Emissions, Industrial Structure, and Regional Innovation of Counties in Shandong Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, June.
    22. Robaina Alves, Margarita & Moutinho, Victor, 2013. "Decomposition analysis and Innovative Accounting Approach for energy-related CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions intensity over 1996–2009 in Portugal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 775-787.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fanchao Kong & Hongkai Zhang & Xiangyan Meng & Shuai Li & Jia Liu, 2022. "Can the Policy of National Urban Agglomeration Improve Economic and Environmental Gains? Evidence from Quasi-Natural Experiments with 280 Cities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Lin, Boqiang & Zhu, Junpeng, 2019. "Impact of energy saving and emission reduction policy on urban sustainable development: Empirical evidence from China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 12-22.
    3. Ionica Oncioiu & Anca Gabriela Petrescu & Eugenia Grecu & Marius Petrescu, 2017. "Optimizing the Renewable Energy Potential: Myth or Future Trend in Romania," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Qingyou Yan & Yaxian Wang & Tomas Baležentis & Yikai Sun & Dalia Streimikiene, 2018. "Energy-Related CO 2 Emission in China’s Provincial Thermal Electricity Generation: Driving Factors and Possibilities for Abatement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, April.
    5. Köne, Aylin Çiğdem & Büke, Tayfun, 2019. "Factor analysis of projected carbon dioxide emissions according to the IPCC based sustainable emission scenario in Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 914-918.
    6. Fernández González, P. & Presno, M.J. & Landajo, M., 2015. "Regional and sectoral attribution to percentage changes in the European Divisia carbonization index," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1437-1452.
    7. Xiaohong Liu & Meiwen Zhang, 2022. "The Impact of Market Integration on Renewable Energy Technology Innovation: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, October.
    8. Lu, Qinli & Yang, Hong & Huang, Xianjin & Chuai, Xiaowei & Wu, Changyan, 2015. "Multi-sectoral decomposition in decoupling industrial growth from carbon emissions in the developed Jiangsu Province, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 414-425.
    9. Yuan Zeng & Wengang Zhang & Jingwen Sun & Li’ao Sun & Jun Wu, 2023. "Research on Regional Carbon Emission Reduction in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Urban Agglomeration Based on System Dynamics: Key Factors and Policy Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-20, September.
    10. Chun Fu & Can Zhou, 2023. "Examining the Impact of Real Estate Development on Carbon Emissions Using Differential Generalized Method of Moments and Dynamic Panel Threshold Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, April.
    11. Junjun Niu & Chunmei Mao, 2023. "The Policy Evolution Characteristics of Regional Integration Development in the Yangtze River Delta: A Quantitative Analysis Based on Policy Texts from 2003 to 2022," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-27, October.
    12. Jie-fang Dong & Qiang Wang & Chun Deng & Xing-min Wang & Xiao-lei Zhang, 2016. "How to Move China toward a Green-Energy Economy: From a Sector Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-18, April.
    13. Salahuddin, Mohammad & Gow, Jeff, 2014. "Economic growth, energy consumption and CO2 emissions in Gulf Cooperation Council countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 44-58.
    14. Zilong Zhang & Bing Xue & Jiaxing Pang & Xingpeng Chen, 2016. "The Decoupling of Resource Consumption and Environmental Impact from Economic Growth in China: Spatial Pattern and Temporal Trend," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-13, February.
    15. Xu, Xianshuo & Zhao, Tao & Liu, Nan & Kang, Jidong, 2014. "Changes of energy-related GHG emissions in China: An empirical analysis from sectoral perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 298-307.
    16. Kun Zheng & Hongbing Deng & Kangni Lyu & Shuang Yang & Yu Cao, 2022. "Market Integration, Industrial Structure, and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-22, December.
    17. Yanan Chen & Sheng Lin, 2015. "Decomposition and allocation of energy-related carbon dioxide emission allowance over provinces of China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 76(3), pages 1893-1909, April.
    18. Chen, Danling & Hu, Wenbo & Li, Yuying & Zhang, Chaozheng & Lu, Xinhai & Cheng, Hui, 2023. "Exploring the temporal and spatial effects of city size on regional economic integration: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    19. Zhang, Wei & You, Jianmin & Lin, Weiwen, 2021. "Internet plus and China industrial system's low-carbon development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    20. Xianwang Lv & Yingming Zhu & Jiazhen Du, 2024. "Can Regional Integration Policies Enhance the Win–Win Situation of Economic Growth and Environmental Protection? New Evidence for Achieving Carbon Neutrality Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-22, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:24:p:9492-:d:1003395. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.