IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i21p8149-d959863.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Fluid Viscosity on Cavitation Characteristics of a Helico-Axial Multiphase Pump (HAMP)

Author

Listed:
  • Kaijie Ye

    (Institute of Water Resources and Hydro-Electric Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, No. 5 Jinhua South Road, Xi’an 710048, China)

  • Denghui He

    (Institute of Water Resources and Hydro-Electric Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, No. 5 Jinhua South Road, Xi’an 710048, China
    State Key Laboratory of Eco-Hydraulic in Northwest Arid Region, Xi’an University of Technology, No. 5 Jinhua South Road, Xi’an 710048, China)

  • Lin Zhao

    (Institute of Water Resources and Hydro-Electric Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, No. 5 Jinhua South Road, Xi’an 710048, China)

  • Pengcheng Guo

    (Institute of Water Resources and Hydro-Electric Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, No. 5 Jinhua South Road, Xi’an 710048, China
    State Key Laboratory of Eco-Hydraulic in Northwest Arid Region, Xi’an University of Technology, No. 5 Jinhua South Road, Xi’an 710048, China)

Abstract

Fluid viscosity is one of the key factors affecting the cavitation characteristics of the Helico-axial Multiphase Pump (HAMP). In this paper, fluids with viscosities of 24.46 mm 2 /s, 48.48 mm 2 /s, 60.70 mm 2 /s, and 120.0 mm 2 /s were investigated by numerical simulation. The Ansys Fluent software was employed to conduct the simulation. The mixture multiphase flow model and the RNG k-ε turbulence model were adopted. The Singhal cavitation model was employed to consider the effects of the non-condensable gas on cavitation. An experiment was carried out to validate the numerical method. The results showed that the Net Positive Suction Head-available (NPSHA) of the pump decreased as the fluid viscosity increased. Under the critical NPSHA condition, the NPSHA decreased from 5.11 m to 3.68 m as the fluid viscosity increased from 24.46 mm 2 /s to 120.0 mm 2 /s. This suggested that the cavitation performance of the pump was deteriorated under high fluid viscosity. The impeller passage area occupied by the vapor increased when the fluid viscosity increased. Nearly half of the flow passages were occupied by cavitation bubbles when the fluid viscosity increased to 120.0 mm 2 /s. The vapor volume fraction, both on the suction surface and pressure surface of the blade, increased with the fluid viscosity. The vapor on the suction surface was mainly distributed in the region with the streamwise between 0 and 0.36 when the fluid viscosity was 24.46 mm 2 /s; while the high vapor volume fraction range increased to the streamwise of 0.42 when the fluid viscosity increased to 120.0 mm 2 /s. The higher vapor volume fraction corresponded with the lower pressure. It was also found that the turbulent kinetic energy, both on the suction surface and pressure surface, increased with the fluid viscosity, which was the favorite for producing more cavitation bubbles. Furthermore, the maximum velocity area was mainly concentrated in the inlet area of the impeller. The velocity distribution in the impeller was basically the same with the viscosity of 24.46 mm 2 /s and 48.48 mm 2 /s. When the viscosity further increased to 60.70 mm 2 /s, the maximum velocity area in the impeller was relatively large. This study provides a reference for designing the HAMP.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaijie Ye & Denghui He & Lin Zhao & Pengcheng Guo, 2022. "Influence of Fluid Viscosity on Cavitation Characteristics of a Helico-Axial Multiphase Pump (HAMP)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:21:p:8149-:d:959863
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/21/8149/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/21/8149/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ge, Mingming & Manikkam, Pratulya & Ghossein, Joe & Kumar Subramanian, Roshan & Coutier-Delgosha, Olivier & Zhang, Guangjian, 2022. "Dynamic mode decomposition to classify cavitating flow regimes induced by thermodynamic effects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    2. Peng Liu & Yumo Wang & Feng Yan & Chaofei Nie & Xin Ouyang & Jiashuang Xu & Jing Gong, 2020. "Effects of Fluid Viscosity and Two-Phase Flow on Performance of ESP," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Jianjun Zhu & Hong-Quan Zhang, 2018. "A Review of Experiments and Modeling of Gas-Liquid Flow in Electrical Submersible Pumps," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-41, January.
    4. Liu, Ming & Tan, Lei & Cao, Shuliang, 2020. "Influence of viscosity on energy performance and flow field of a multiphase pump," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1151-1160.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bingyuan Hong & Xiaoping Li & Yanbo Li & Yu Li & Yafeng Yu & Yumo Wang & Jing Gong & Dihui Ai, 2021. "Numerical Simulation of Elbow Erosion in Shale Gas Fields under Gas-Solid Two-Phase Flow," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Xu, Zhe & Zheng, Yuan & Kan, Kan & Chen, Huixiang, 2023. "Flow instability and energy performance of a coastal axial-flow pump as turbine under the influence of upstream waves," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    3. Pei, Yingju & Liu, Qingyou & Wang, Chuan & Wang, Guorong, 2021. "Energy efficiency prediction model and energy characteristics of subsea disc pump based on velocity slip and similarity theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    4. Bingyuan Hong & Yanbo Li & Xiaoping Li & Shuaipeng Ji & Yafeng Yu & Di Fan & Yating Qian & Jian Guo & Jing Gong, 2021. "Numerical Simulation of Gas-Solid Two-Phase Erosion for Elbow and Tee Pipe in Gas Field," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Huahuang Lai & Haoshu Wang & Zhen Zhou & Rongsheng Zhu & Yun Long, 2023. "Research on Cavitation Performance of Bidirectional Integrated Pump Gate," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Alexey Abdrashitov & Alexander Gavrilov & Evgeny Marfin & Vladimir Panchenko & Andrey Kovalev & Vadim Bolshev & Julia Karaeva, 2023. "Cavitation Reactor for Pretreatment of Liquid Agricultural Waste," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Qifeng Jiang & Yaguang Heng & Xiaobing Liu & Weibin Zhang & Gérard Bois & Qiaorui Si, 2019. "A Review of Design Considerations of Centrifugal Pump Capability for Handling Inlet Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flows," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Yaguang Heng & Yuming Han & Huiyu Zhang & Weibin Zhang & Gérard Bois & Qifeng Jiang & Zhengwei Wang & Xiaobing Liu, 2020. "Tesla Bladed Pump (Disc Bladed Pump) Preliminary Experimental Performance Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-13, September.
    9. Yang, Yang & Zhou, Ling & Hang, Jianwei & Du, Danyang & Shi, Weidong & He, Zhaoming, 2021. "Energy characteristics and optimal design of diffuser meridian in an electrical submersible pump," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 718-727.
    10. Xiaoke He & Yu Song & Kaipeng Wu & Asad Ali & Chunhao Shen & Qiaorui Si, 2022. "Intelligent Identification of Cavitation State of Centrifugal Pump Based on Support Vector Machine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-17, November.
    11. Weihua Sun & Zhiyi Yu & Wenwu Zhang, 2022. "Effect of Shear-Thinning Property on the Energy Performance and Flow Field of an Axial Flow Pump," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, March.
    12. Qiaorui Si & Gérard Bois & Minquan Liao & Haoyang Zhang & Qianglei Cui & Shouqi Yuan, 2019. "A Comparative Study on Centrifugal Pump Designs and Two-Phase Flow Characteristic under Inlet Gas Entrainment Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, December.
    13. Leonid Plotnikov & Nikita Grigoriev & Leonid Osipov & Vladimir Slednev & Vladislav Shurupov, 2022. "Stationary Gas Dynamics and Heat Transfer of Turbulent Flows in Straight Pipes at Different Turbulence Intensity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-13, October.
    14. Yun Long & Mingyu Zhang & Zhen Zhou & Jinqing Zhong & Ce An & Yong Chen & Churui Wan & Rongsheng Zhu, 2023. "Research on Cavitation Wake Vortex Structures Near the Impeller Tip of a Water-Jet Pump," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-20, February.
    15. Stylianos Argyrios Pitsikoulis & Sravya Tekumalla & Anurag Sharma & Wai Leong Eugene Wong & Serkan Turkmen & Pengfei Liu, 2023. "Cavitation Hydrodynamic Performance of 3-D Printed Highly Skewed Stainless Steel Tidal Turbine Rotors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-26, April.
    16. Sangyoon Kim & Changgu Kim & Byungha Kim & Hyunjun Jang & Incheol Kim & Young-Ho Lee, 2022. "A Study Comparing the Subsurface Vortex Characteristics in Pump Sumps," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-12, July.
    17. Asad Ali & Jianping Yuan & Fanjie Deng & Biaobiao Wang & Liangliang Liu & Qiaorui Si & Noman Ali Buttar, 2021. "Research Progress and Prospects of Multi-Stage Centrifugal Pump Capability for Handling Gas–Liquid Multiphase Flow: Comparison and Empirical Model Validation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-34, February.
    18. Qiaorui Si & Gérard Bois & Qifeng Jiang & Wenting He & Asad Ali & Shouqi Yuan, 2018. "Investigation on the Handling Ability of Centrifugal Pumps under Air–Water Two-Phase Inflow: Model and Experimental Validation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    19. Huichuang Li & Wenwu Zhang & Liwei Hu & Baoshan Zhu & Fujun Wang, 2023. "Studies on Flow Characteristics of Gas–Liquid Multiphase Pumps Applied in Petroleum Transportation Engineering—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-24, August.
    20. Qiaorui Si & Haoyang Zhang & Gérard Bois & Jinfeng Zhang & Qianglei Cui & Shouqi Yuan, 2019. "Experimental Investigations on the Inner Flow Behavior of Centrifugal Pumps under Inlet Air-Water Two-Phase Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-14, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:21:p:8149-:d:959863. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.