IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i20p7479-d939081.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supply Chain Readiness for Solar PV Expansion in Saudi Arabia

Author

Listed:
  • Nasser Alghamdi

    (Energy & Climate Change Division, Sustainable Energy Research Group ( www.energy.soton.ac.uk ), Faculty of Engineering & the Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 7QF, UK
    Industrial Engineering Department, University of Jeddah, Jeddah 23890, Saudi Arabia)

  • AbuBakr S. Bahaj

    (Energy & Climate Change Division, Sustainable Energy Research Group ( www.energy.soton.ac.uk ), Faculty of Engineering & the Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 7QF, UK)

  • Patrick James

    (Energy & Climate Change Division, Sustainable Energy Research Group ( www.energy.soton.ac.uk ), Faculty of Engineering & the Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 7QF, UK)

Abstract

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) has an ambitious plan to install 40 GW of solar photovoltaic (PV) capacity via large scale projects (majority of which are >100 MW) across the country by 2030. These projects are required to achieve a threshold percentage of the overall project cost as in country expenditure, termed “local content”. This threshold will rise to 40–45% by 2028, ensuring solar projects do not simply become investment opportunities for overseas companies but deliver jobs and skills development within the Kingdom. Local content is assessed across all aspects of a PV system—module, inverter, structure, etc. Typically, the PV module cost can range between ~34% to ~44% of the overall system cost. However, 56% of this module cost represents the manufacture of the solar cells. To maximise local content, the opportunity for KSA lies in module fabrication of imported solar cells. This study assesses the capacity readiness of the KSA to meet this opportunity in relation to its 2030 targets and the current policy landscape. The recently completed 300 MW Sakaka project had a local content of >30% based on the developers’ website and >35% based on our private communication. Our results indicate that this would rise by 19% for a project like Sakaka if all modules were fabricated in-country rather than being imported. The work also projected a shortfall in terms of in-country module fabrication capacity with clear implications to local content targets. The results show a shortfall in the range of 35% to 75% by 2030 depending on the adopted KSA energy policies and government support. KSA is seen to have good capacity in other PV components such as steel and float glass. In-country distribution of imported solar cells to module fabrication centres and subsequent distribution to PV farm sites has also been assessed. Our analyses indicate that a two-location solution reduces cost with new module fabrication capacity sited near Jeddah and Riyadh, minimising storage times, delivery time to site and distribution waiting times.

Suggested Citation

  • Nasser Alghamdi & AbuBakr S. Bahaj & Patrick James, 2022. "Supply Chain Readiness for Solar PV Expansion in Saudi Arabia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-16, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:20:p:7479-:d:939081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/20/7479/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/20/7479/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bahaj, AbuBakr S. & Mahdy, Mostafa & Alghamdi, Abdulsalam S. & Richards, David J., 2020. "New approach to determine the Importance Index for developing offshore wind energy potential sites: Supported by UK and Arabian Peninsula case studies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 441-457.
    2. Liang, Jinhao & Irfan, Muhammad & Ikram, Muhammad & Zimon, Dominik, 2022. "Evaluating natural resources volatility in an emerging economy: The influence of solar energy development barriers," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sultan J. Alharbi & Abdulaziz S. Alaboodi, 2023. "A Review on Techno-Economic Study for Supporting Building with PV-Grid-Connected Systems under Saudi Regulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-14, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Noorollahi, Younes & Ghenaatpisheh Senani, Ali & Fadaei, Ahmad & Simaee, Mobina & Moltames, Rahim, 2022. "A framework for GIS-based site selection and technical potential evaluation of PV solar farm using Fuzzy-Boolean logic and AHP multi-criteria decision-making approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 89-104.
    2. Effrosyni Giama & Elli Kyriaki & Athanasios Papaevaggelou & Agis Papadopoulos, 2023. "Energy and Environmental Analysis of Renewable Energy Systems Focused on Biomass Technologies for Residential Applications: The Life Cycle Energy Analysis Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Abramic, A. & García Mendoza, A. & Haroun, R., 2021. "Introducing offshore wind energy in the sea space: Canary Islands case study developed under Maritime Spatial Planning principles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    4. Sofia Spyridonidou & Eva Loukogeorgaki & Dimitra G. Vagiona & Teresa Bertrand, 2022. "Towards a Sustainable Spatial Planning Approach for PV Site Selection in Portugal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Xie, Bofeng & Rehman, Mubeen Abdur & Zhang, Junyan & Yang, Runze, 2022. "Does the financialization of natural resources lead toward sustainability? An application of advance panel Granger non-causality," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    6. Zeng, Bing & Fahad, Shah & Bai, Dongbei & Zhang, Jisheng & Işık, Cem, 2023. "Assessing the sustainability of natural resources using the five forces and value chain combined models: The influence of solar energy development," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    7. Wang, Rongji & Laila, Ume & Nazir, Rabia & Hao, Xibin, 2023. "Unleashing the influence of industrialization and trade openness on renewable energy intensity using path model analysis: A roadmap towards sustainable development," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 280-288.
    8. Zhao, Xinlu & Adebayo, Tomiwa Sunday & Kong, Xianli & Al-Faryan, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh, 2022. "Relating energy innovations and natural resources as determinants of environmental sustainability: The role of globalization in G7 countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    9. Rajkumar, G. & Saravanan, M. & Marimuthu, P., 2023. "Developing a numerical model to analyze the production process of PMEDM," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    10. Chen, Huihui & Rehman, Mubeen Abdur & Luo, Jia & Ali, Madad, 2022. "Dynamic influence of natural resources, financial integration and eco-innovation on ecological sustainability in EKC framework: Fresh insights from China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    11. Xin, Yongrong & Khan, Rizwan Ullah & Dagar, Vishal & Qian, Fang, 2023. "Do international resources configure SMEs' sustainable performance in the digital era? Evidence from Pakistan," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    12. Lyu, Yanwei & Xiao, Xuan & Zhang, Jinning, 2024. "Does the digital economy enhance green total factor productivity in China? The evidence from a national big data comprehensive pilot zone," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 183-196.
    13. Irfan, Muhammad & Razzaq, Asif & Sharif, Arshian & Yang, Xiaodong, 2022. "Influence mechanism between green finance and green innovation: Exploring regional policy intervention effects in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    14. Songhee Han & Jeonghee Park & Heeseob Lee & Wona Lee & JiHee Son, 2023. "Identifying and Prioritizing Barriers to Climate Technology International Cooperation from the Perspective of Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    15. Irfan, Muhammad & Abdur Rehman, Mubeen & Liu, Xuemei & Razzaq, Asif, 2022. "Interlinkages between mineral resources, financial markets, and sustainable energy sources: Evidence from minerals exporting countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    16. Abdelaziz, Sara & Sparrow, Sarah N. & Hua, Weiqi & Wallom, David C.H., 2024. "Assessing long-term future climate change impacts on extreme low wind events for offshore wind turbines in the UK exclusive economic zone," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 354(PB).
    17. Li, He & Teixeira, Angelo P. & Guedes Soares, C., 2020. "A two-stage Failure Mode and Effect Analysis of offshore wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1438-1461.
    18. Mahmoud G. Hemeida & Ashraf M. Hemeida & Tomonobu Senjyu & Dina Osheba, 2022. "Renewable Energy Resources Technologies and Life Cycle Assessment: Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-36, December.
    19. Adalberto Ospino-Castro & Carlos Robles-Algarín & Amanda Mangones-Cordero & Sharys Romero-Navas, 2023. "An Analytic Hierarchy Process Based Approach for Evaluating Feasibility of Offshore Wind Farm on the Colombian Caribbean Coast," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(6), pages 64-73, November.
    20. Mahdi Salehi & Seyed Hamed Fahimifard & Grzegorz Zimon & Andrzej Bujak & Adam Sadowski, 2022. "The Effect of CO 2 Gas Emissions on the Market Value, Price and Shares Returns," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-17, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:20:p:7479-:d:939081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.