IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i15p5738-d882544.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Evaluation Method of Digital Project Cloud Model Considering Weight Sensitivity

Author

Listed:
  • Ye Zhu

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Jinchao Li

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
    Beijing Key Laboratory of New Energy and Low-Carbon Development, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Xinyi Lan

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Shiqiang Lu

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Jie Yu

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

Abstract

Digitization is a driving force for social development and corporate innovation. Digital projects have become an indispensable part of the sustainable development of enterprises. However, due to the imperfect decision-making system of digital projects and the lack of experience of traditional enterprises’ digital projects, the decision-making of digital projects is an unavoidable challenge in the digital transformation of enterprises. For the digital project decision of the STATE GRID Corporation of China, this paper conducts a sensitivity analysis of digital project evaluation index weights based on cloud model theory, on top of historical successful project experience to support digital project decision-making. Firstly, this paper establishes a comprehensive evaluation index system for digitalization projects from five aspects: economic efficiency, interconnection, intelligent management, value release, and development innovation. The coefficient of variation method is used for index screening, and the weight intervals are formed by four subjective and objective assignment methods. Then, the LSOM model is established to generate the weight values in the interval, and, finally, the sensitivity of digital project comprehensive evaluation indexes is analyzed based on the cloud model to select the most robust index weights for project evaluation and choose the optimal project. The feasibility of the proposed method is verified by arithmetic examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Ye Zhu & Jinchao Li & Xinyi Lan & Shiqiang Lu & Jie Yu, 2022. "Research on Evaluation Method of Digital Project Cloud Model Considering Weight Sensitivity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:15:p:5738-:d:882544
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/15/5738/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/15/5738/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iivari, Netta & Sharma, Sumita & Ventä-Olkkonen, Leena, 2020. "Digital transformation of everyday life – How COVID-19 pandemic transformed the basic education of the young generation and why information management research should care?," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    2. Jian-qiang Wang & Juan-juan Peng & Hong-yu Zhang & Tao Liu & Xiao-hong Chen, 2015. "An Uncertain Linguistic Multi-criteria Group Decision-Making Method Based on a Cloud Model," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 171-192, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ulvi Rzazade & Sergey Deryabin & Igor Temkin & Egor Kondratev & Alexander Ivannikov, 2023. "On the Issue of the Creation and Functioning of Energy Efficiency Management Systems for Technological Processes of Mining Enterprises," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-21, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yan, Hong-Bin & Ma, Tieju & Huynh, Van-Nam, 2017. "On qualitative multi-attribute group decision making and its consensus measure: A probability based perspective," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 94-117.
    2. Mohammed Airaj, 2022. "Cloud Computing Technology and PBL Teaching Approach for a Qualitative Education in Line with SDG4," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Peide Liu & Hongyu Yang & Haiquan Wu & Meilong Ju & Fawaz E. Alsaadi, 2019. "Some Maclaurin Symmetric Mean Aggregation Operators Based on Cloud Model and Their Application to Decision-Making," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(03), pages 981-1007, May.
    4. Fang, Hong & Wang, Xu & Song, Wenyan, 2020. "Technology selection for photovoltaic cell from sustainability perspective: An integrated approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1029-1041.
    5. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Alexandra Sandu & Chris Taylor & Jennifer May Hampton, 2024. "Children’s Subjective Well-Being During the Coronavirus Pandemic," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 17(1), pages 309-347, February.
    6. Xiao-kang Wang & Sheng-hui Wang & Hong-yu Zhang & Jian-qiang Wang & Lin Li, 2021. "The Recommendation Method for Hotel Selection Under Traveller Preference Characteristics: A Cloud-Based Multi-Criteria Group Decision Support Model," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(6), pages 1433-1469, December.
    7. Wang, Xu & Fang, Hong & Fang, Siran, 2020. "An integrated approach for exploitation block selection of shale gas—based on cloud model and grey relational analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    8. Pinto, Marcelo Rezende & Salume, Paula Karina & Barbosa, Marcelo Werneck & de Sousa, Paulo Renato, 2023. "The path to digital maturity: A cluster analysis of the retail industry in an emerging economy," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    9. Mas Ayu Mumin, 2023. "Managing Heutagogy during COVID-19 Pandemic via Virtual Learning and its impact on Academic Identity Status and Communities of Practice (COP)," GATR Journals jmmr314, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    10. Ke-Qin Wang & Hu-Chen Liu & Liping Liu & Jia Huang, 2017. "Green Supplier Evaluation and Selection Using Cloud Model Theory and the QUALIFLEX Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, April.
    11. Wu-E Yang & Chao-Qun Ma & Zhi-Qiu Han & Wen-Jun Chen, 2016. "Checking and adjusting order-consistency of linguistic pairwise comparison matrices for getting transitive preference relations," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(3), pages 769-787, July.
    12. Ramy A. Rahimi & Grace S. Oh, 2024. "Rethinking the role of educators in the 21st century: navigating globalization, technology, and pandemics," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(2), pages 182-197, June.
    13. Qingfu Li & Huade Zhou & Qiang Ma & Linfang Lu, 2021. "Evaluation of Serviceability of Canal Lining Based on AHP–Simple Correlation Function Method–Cloud Model: A Case Study in Henan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-25, November.
    14. Kumari Vibhuti Nayak & Shamsher Alam, 2022. "The digital divide, gender and education: challenges for tribal youth in rural Jharkhand during Covid-19," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 49(2), pages 223-237, June.
    15. Ayyildiz, Ertugrul, 2022. "Fermatean fuzzy step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) and its application to prioritizing indicators to achieve sustainable development goal-7," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 136-148.
    16. Dabija, Dan-Cristian & Brătianu, Constantin & Dominici, Gandolfo & Vătămănescu, Elena-Mădălina, 2024. "Unveiling e-learning and knowledge sharing during the pandemic: From expert skills perception to student satisfaction," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    17. Aslihan Yildiz & Ertugrul Ayyildiz & Alev Taskin Gumus & Coskun Ozkan, 2020. "A Modified Balanced Scorecard Based Hybrid Pythagorean Fuzzy AHP-Topsis Methodology for ATM Site Selection Problem," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(02), pages 365-384, March.
    18. Bright Obuobi & Hong Wang & Faustina Awuah & Emmanuel Nketiah & Gibbson Adu-Gyamfi & Mavis Adjei, 2024. "The aftermath of COVID-19 impacts: examining the impact of COVID-19 on residents' current food waste behavior," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(10), pages 25503-25526, October.
    19. Almudena Filgueira-Vizoso & Laura Castro-Santos & Ana Isabel García-Diez & Félix Puime Guillén & María Isabel Lamas-Galdo & Manuel Ángel Graña-López, 2022. "Opening or Not Opening Educational Centers in Time of SARS-CoV-2? Analysis of the Situation in Galicia (Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, May.
    20. Brozović Mateja & Ercegović Marina & Meeh-Bunse Gunther, 2022. "e-Learning in Higher Institutions and Secondary Schools during Covid-19: Crisis Solving and Future Perspectives," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 13(2), pages 45-71, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:15:p:5738-:d:882544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.