IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i15p5389-d871944.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Sequential Multi-Staged Approach for Developing Digital One-Stop Shops to Support Energy Renovations of Residential Buildings

Author

Listed:
  • Miguel Macias Sequeira

    (CENSE, FCT-NOVA—Center for Environmental and Sustainability Research & CHANGE—Global Change and Sustainability Institute, NOVA School of Science and Technology, NOVA University Lisbon, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal)

  • João Pedro Gouveia

    (CENSE, FCT-NOVA—Center for Environmental and Sustainability Research & CHANGE—Global Change and Sustainability Institute, NOVA School of Science and Technology, NOVA University Lisbon, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal)

Abstract

Buildings account for 40% of the European Union’s energy consumption. Deep energy renovation of residential buildings is key for decarbonization and energy poverty alleviation. However, renovation is occurring at far below the needed pace and depth. In this context, building renovation one-stop shops, which bring all project phases under one roof and provide advice, support, and finance to households, are highlighted as a promising solution. Nevertheless, this model is still absent or under-developed in most European countries and remains understudied in the scientific literature. Therefore, the present research goals are as follows: (i) to provide a critical review of emerging one-stop shop models; (ii) to streamline the deployment of building renovation digital one-stop shops by piloting a sequential multi-staged approach for Portuguese households and proposing it for replication elsewhere; and (iii) to compare case-study insights with other one-stop shops and discuss the notion in the context of the European Renovation Wave. In total, for the Portuguese case-study, five steps were conducted. The first three—stakeholder mapping, expert interviews, and customer journey—aimed to gather intel on the local energy renovation market. The results from these stages informed the design of the platform (fourth step). Finally, a post-launch market consultation survey gathered user feedback (fifth step). Insights from this study suggest that digital one-stop shops, while providing a helpful tool to close information gaps and activate specific audiences, may be insufficient on their own. As such, a more comprehensive set of instruments supporting households is needed to accelerate building renovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Miguel Macias Sequeira & João Pedro Gouveia, 2022. "A Sequential Multi-Staged Approach for Developing Digital One-Stop Shops to Support Energy Renovations of Residential Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-27, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:15:p:5389-:d:871944
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/15/5389/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/15/5389/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bartiaux, Françoise & Schmidt, Luísa & Horta, Ana & Correia, Augusta, 2016. "Social diffusion of energy-related practices and representations: Patterns and policies in Portugal and Belgium," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 413-421.
    2. Barbiero, Tommaso & Grillenzoni, Carlo, 2019. "A statistical analysis of the energy effectiveness of building refurbishment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Reuter, Matthias & Patel, Martin K. & Eichhammer, Wolfgang & Lapillonne, Bruno & Pollier, Karine, 2020. "A comprehensive indicator set for measuring multiple benefits of energy efficiency," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    4. Iñigo Antepara & Lefkothea Papada & João Pedro Gouveia & Nikolas Katsoulakos & Dimitris Kaliampakos, 2020. "Improving Energy Poverty Measurement in Southern European Regions through Equivalization of Modeled Energy Costs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-21, July.
    5. Mainali, Brijesh & Mahapatra, Krushna & Pardalis, Georgios, 2021. "Strategies for deep renovation market of detached houses," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    6. Murto, P. & Jalas, M. & Juntunen, J. & Hyysalo, S., 2019. "Devices and strategies: An analysis of managing complexity in energy retrofit projects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Pillai, Arya & Tovar Reaños, Miguel & Curtis, John, 2021. "An examination of energy efficiency retrofit scheme applications by low-income households in Ireland," Papers WP700, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    8. Ebrahimigharehbaghi, Shima & Qian, Queena K. & Meijer, Frits M. & Visscher, Henk J., 2019. "Unravelling Dutch homeowners' behaviour towards energy efficiency renovations: What drives and hinders their decision-making?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 546-561.
    9. Owen, A. & Mitchell, G. & Gouldson, A., 2014. "Unseen influence—The role of low carbon retrofit advisers and installers in the adoption and use of domestic energy technology," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 169-179.
    10. Kerr, N. & Winskel, M., 2020. "Household investment in home energy retrofit: A review of the evidence on effective public policy design for privately owned homes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    11. Elena Mazzola & Tiziano Dalla Mora & Fabio Peron & Piercarlo Romagnoni, 2019. "An Integrated Energy and Environmental Audit Process for Historic Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    12. Minyoung Kwon & Erwin Mlecnik, 2021. "Modular Web Portal Approach for Stimulating Home Renovation: Lessons from Local Authority Developments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, February.
    13. Mahapatra, Krushna & Gustavsson, Leif & Haavik, Trond & Aabrekk, Synnøve & Svendsen, Svend & Vanhoutteghem, Lies & Paiho, Satu & Ala-Juusela, Mia, 2013. "Business models for full service energy renovation of single-family houses in Nordic countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1558-1565.
    14. Galvin, Ray & Sunikka-Blank, Minna, 2014. "The UK homeowner-retrofitter as an innovator in a socio-technical system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 655-662.
    15. Coline Senior & Alenka Temeljotov Salaj & Milena Vukmirovic & Mina Jowkar & Živa Kristl, 2021. "The Spirit of Time—The Art of Self-Renovation to Improve Indoor Environment in Cultural Heritage Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-27, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Konstantinos Sofias & Zoe Kanetaki & Constantinos Stergiou & Sébastien Jacques, 2023. "Combining CAD Modeling and Simulation of Energy Performance Data for the Retrofit of Public Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Pedro Moura & Paula Fonseca & Inês Cunha & Nuno Morais, 2024. "Diagnosing Energy Poverty in Portugal through the Lens of a Social Survey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-28, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maia, Iná E.N. & Harringer, Daniel & Kranzl, Lukas, 2024. "Household budget restrictions as reason for staged retrofits: A case study in Spain," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Pardalis, Georgios & Talmar, Madis & Keskin, Duygu, 2021. "To be or not to be: The organizational conditions for launching one-stop-shops for energy related renovations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    3. Tzani, Dimitra & Stavrakas, Vassilis & Santini, Marion & Thomas, Samuel & Rosenow, Jan & Flamos, Alexandros, 2022. "Pioneering a performance-based future for energy efficiency: Lessons learnt from a comparative review analysis of pay-for-performance programmes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    4. Minyoung Kwon & Erwin Mlecnik & Vincent Gruis, 2021. "Business Model Development for Temporary Home Renovation Consultancy Centres: Experiences from European Pop-Ups," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Murto, P. & Jalas, M. & Juntunen, J. & Hyysalo, S., 2019. "Devices and strategies: An analysis of managing complexity in energy retrofit projects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Decuypere, Robbe & Robaeyst, Ben & Hudders, Liselot & Baccarne, Bastiaan & Van de Sompel, Dieneke, 2022. "Transitioning to energy efficient housing: Drivers and barriers of intermediaries in heat pump technology," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    7. Mainali, Brijesh & Mahapatra, Krushna & Pardalis, Georgios, 2021. "Strategies for deep renovation market of detached houses," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    8. Mignon, Ingrid & Winberg, Lisa, 2023. "The role of public energy advising in sustainability transitions – empirical evidence from Sweden," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    9. Luca Caneparo, 2020. "Financing the (Environmental) Quality of Cities with Energy Efficiency Investments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-25, October.
    10. Rolando Biere-Arenas & Silvia Spairani-Berrio & Yolanda Spairani-Berrio & Carlos Marmolejo-Duarte, 2021. "One-Stop-Shops for Energy Renovation of Dwellings in Europe—Approach to the Factors That Determine Success and Future Lines of Action," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-24, November.
    11. Rana, Anber & Sadiq, Rehan & Alam, M. Shahria & Karunathilake, Hirushie & Hewage, Kasun, 2021. "Evaluation of financial incentives for green buildings in Canadian landscape," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    12. Murto, Pekka & Jalas, Mikko & Juntunen, Jouni & Hyysalo, Sampsa, 2019. "The difficult process of adopting a comprehensive energy retrofit in housing companies: Barriers posed by nascent markets and complicated calculability," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 955-964.
    13. Benedikt Maciosek & Mehdi Farsi & Sylvain Weber & Martin Jakob, 2022. "Impact of complexity and experience on energy investment decisions for residential buildings," IRENE Working Papers 22-07, IRENE Institute of Economic Research.
    14. Feser, Daniel & Runst, Petrik, 2015. "Energy efficiency consultants as change agents? Examining the reasons for EECs’ limited success," ifh Working Papers 1 (2015), Volkswirtschaftliches Institut für Mittelstand und Handwerk an der Universität Göttingen (ifh).
    15. O’Keeffe, Juliette M. & Gilmour, Daniel & Simpson, Edward, 2016. "A network approach to overcoming barriers to market engagement for SMEs in energy efficiency initiatives such as the Green Deal," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 582-590.
    16. Roberta Pernetti & Riccardo Pinotti & Roberto Lollini, 2021. "Repository of Deep Renovation Packages Based on Industrialized Solutions: Definition and Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, June.
    17. Thøgersen, John, 2017. "Housing-related lifestyle and energy saving: A multi-level approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 73-87.
    18. Roberto Barrella & José Carlos Romero & Lucía Mariño, 2022. "Proposing a Novel Minimum Income Standard Approach to Energy Poverty Assessment: A European Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, November.
    19. Feser, Daniel & Runst, Petrik, 2016. "Energy efficiency consultants as change agents? Examining the reasons for EECs’ limited success," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 309-317.
    20. Bertoldi, Paolo & Boza-Kiss, Benigna, 2017. "Analysis of barriers and drivers for the development of the ESCO markets in Europe," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 345-355.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:15:p:5389-:d:871944. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.