IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i14p5075-d861035.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Annual Electric Energy Trade Scheduling Model under the Dual Track Mode

Author

Listed:
  • Na Zhang

    (State Grid Liaoning Economic Research Institute, Shenyang 110015, China)

  • Mingli Zhang

    (State Grid Liaoning Economic Research Institute, Shenyang 110015, China)

  • Liang Sun

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
    State Grid Liaoning Electric Power Company Limited, Shenyang 110006, China)

  • Jingwei Hu

    (State Grid Liaoning Economic Research Institute, Shenyang 110015, China)

  • Jinqi Li

    (State Grid Liaoning Economic Research Institute, Shenyang 110015, China)

  • Weidong Li

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

Abstract

The annual electricity trade scheduling is the basis of long-term power generation scheduling. In recent decades, the ratio of new energy generation in China has increased annually, and the electricity market has operated under the “market electricity” and “planned electricity” double track mode in recent years. However, the existing annual electricity trade scheduling methods are extensive and cannot adapt to the new situation of “market electricity” and large-scale new energy generation. The annual scheduled energy of the power units is set as a decision variable, and a novel annual energy scheduling optimization model based on Gini coefficient of fairness is presented in this paper. In this model, “market electricity” capacity is conversed monthly, considering peaking reserve demand and monthly characteristics of new energy generation. The fairness constraint set based on Gini coefficient is introduced into the optimization model to solve various fairness problems. Simulation results show that the introduction of the Gini coefficient and the optimization model considering the monthly conversion of marketing electricity capacity can obtain more accurate and reasonable electricity distribution results, and the peaking demand can be considered more fairly and effectively. The proposed method provides a feasible solution to the annual electric energy scheduling for dual-track operation country such as China.

Suggested Citation

  • Na Zhang & Mingli Zhang & Liang Sun & Jingwei Hu & Jinqi Li & Weidong Li, 2022. "An Annual Electric Energy Trade Scheduling Model under the Dual Track Mode," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:14:p:5075-:d:861035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/14/5075/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/14/5075/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eryilmaz, Serkan & Kan, Cihangir, 2020. "Reliability based modeling and analysis for a wind power system integrated by two wind farms considering wind speed dependence," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    2. Kim, Kyung Jae & Lee, Hwarang & Koo, Yoonmo, 2020. "Research on local acceptance cost of renewable energy in South Korea: A case study of photovoltaic and wind power projects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhu, Xiaoxun & Liu, Ruizhang & Chen, Yao & Gao, Xiaoxia & Wang, Yu & Xu, Zixu, 2021. "Wind speed behaviors feather analysis and its utilization on wind speed prediction using 3D-CNN," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    2. Łukasz Augustowski & Piotr Kułyk, 2024. "Conditions for the Development of Wind Energy for Individual Consumers: A Case Study in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-13, July.
    3. Woo, JongRoul & Moon, Sungho & Choi, Hyunhong, 2022. "Economic value and acceptability of advanced solar power systems for multi-unit residential buildings: The case of South Korea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    4. Zhang, Yiying, 2021. "Reliability Analysis of Randomly Weighted k-out-of-n Systems with Heterogeneous Components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    5. Balezentis, Tomas & Streimikiene, Dalia & Mikalauskas, Ignas & Shen, Zhiyang, 2021. "Towards carbon free economy and electricity: The puzzle of energy costs, sustainability and security based on willingness to pay," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    6. Ki, Jaehong & Yun, Sun-Jin & Kim, Woo-Chang & Oh, Subin & Ha, Jihun & Hwangbo, Eunyoung & Lee, Hyoeun & Shin, Sumin & Yoon, Seulki & Youn, Hyewon, 2022. "Local residents’ attitudes about wind farms and associated noise annoyance in South Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    7. Firouzi, Mohsen & Samimi, Abouzar & Salami, Abolfazl, 2022. "Reliability evaluation of a composite power system in the presence of renewable generations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    8. Choi, Hyunhong & Shim, Dongnyok & Kim, Seung Wan, 2024. "Heterogeneous public preferences for undergrounding high-voltage power transmission lines: The case of Seoul metropolitan area in South Korea," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    9. Oehlmann, Malte & Glenk, Klaus & Lloyd-Smith, Patrick & Meyerhoff, Jürgen, 2021. "Quantifying landscape externalities of renewable energy development: Implications of attribute cut-offs in choice experiments," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    10. Ponce Oliva, R.D. & Estay, M. & Barrientos, M. & Estevez, R.A. & Gelcich, S. & Vásquez-Lavín, F., 2024. "Emerging energy sources' social acceptability: Evidence from marine-based energy projects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    11. Choi, Jihye & Kim, Justine Jihyun & Lee, Jongsu, 2024. "Public willingness to pay for mitigating local conflicts over the construction of renewable energy facilities: A contingent valuation study in South Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    12. Nóra Hegedűsné Baranyai & Henrik Zsiborács & András Vincze & Nóra Rodek & Martina Makai & Gábor Pintér, 2021. "Correlation Analysis of the Spread of Household-Sized Photovoltaic Power Plants and Various District Indicators: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-24, January.
    13. Beyza, Jesus & Yusta, Jose M., 2021. "The effects of the high penetration of renewable energies on the reliability and vulnerability of interconnected electric power systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    14. Jain, Tanmay & Verma, Kusum, 2024. "Reliability based computational model for stochastic unit commitment of a bulk power system integrated with volatile wind power," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    15. Moon, Sungho & Kim, Youngwoo & Kim, Minsang & Lee, Jongsu, 2023. "Policy designs to increase public and local acceptance for energy transition in South Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    16. Khai, Huynh Viet & Tran, Huynh Le Thao & Ngan, Nguyen Van & Duyen, Tran Thi Thu, 2024. "Choice modeling approach to evaluate the economic value of renewable energy development," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 10(1), March.
    17. Li, He & Guedes Soares, C, 2022. "Assessment of failure rates and reliability of floating offshore wind turbines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    18. Li, He & Deng, Zhi-Ming & Golilarz, Noorbakhsh Amiri & Guedes Soares, C., 2021. "Reliability analysis of the main drive system of a CNC machine tool including early failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    19. Shahid Ali & Qingyou Yan & Muhammad Sajjad Hussain & Muhammad Irfan & Munir Ahmad & Asif Razzaq & Vishal Dagar & Cem Işık, 2021. "Evaluating Green Technology Strategies for the Sustainable Development of Solar Power Projects: Evidence from Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-29, November.
    20. Son, Woojin & Lee, Seungyeon & Woo, JongRoul, 2023. "Community acceptance of hydrogen power plant projects: The case of South Korea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:14:p:5075-:d:861035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.