IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i13p4801-d852634.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Modeling of a PEM Fuel Cell Power Plant for Flexibility Optimization and Grid Support

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Crespi

    (Group of Energy Conversion Systems, Department of Energy, Politecnico di Milano, 20156 Milano, Italy)

  • Giulio Guandalini

    (Group of Energy Conversion Systems, Department of Energy, Politecnico di Milano, 20156 Milano, Italy)

  • German Nieto Cantero

    (Abengoa Innovación, 41014 Seville, Spain)

  • Stefano Campanari

    (Group of Energy Conversion Systems, Department of Energy, Politecnico di Milano, 20156 Milano, Italy)

Abstract

The transition toward high shares of non-programmable renewable energy sources in the power grid requires an increase in the grid flexibility to guarantee grid reliability and stability. This work, developed within the EU project Grasshopper, identifies hydrogen Fuel Cell (FC) power plants, based on low temperature PEM cells, as a source of flexibility for the power grid. A dynamic numerical model of the flexible FC system is developed and tested against experimental data from a 100-kW pilot plant, built within the Grasshopper project. The model is then applied to assess the flexible performance of a 1 MW system in order to optimize the scale-up of the pilot plant to the MW-size. Simulations of load-following operation show the flexibility of the plant, which can ramp up and down with a ramp rate depending only on an externally imposed limit. Warm-up simulations allow proposing solutions to limit the warm-up time. Of main importance are the minimization of the water inventory in the system and the construction of a compact system, which minimizes the distance between the components.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Crespi & Giulio Guandalini & German Nieto Cantero & Stefano Campanari, 2022. "Dynamic Modeling of a PEM Fuel Cell Power Plant for Flexibility Optimization and Grid Support," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:13:p:4801-:d:852634
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/13/4801/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/13/4801/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gils, Hans Christian & Scholz, Yvonne & Pregger, Thomas & Luca de Tena, Diego & Heide, Dominik, 2017. "Integrated modelling of variable renewable energy-based power supply in Europe," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 173-188.
    2. Pathapati, P.R. & Xue, X. & Tang, J., 2005. "A new dynamic model for predicting transient phenomena in a PEM fuel cell system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 1-22.
    3. Steinke, Florian & Wolfrum, Philipp & Hoffmann, Clemens, 2013. "Grid vs. storage in a 100% renewable Europe," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 826-832.
    4. Barelli, L. & Bidini, G. & Gallorini, F. & Ottaviano, A., 2011. "An energetic–exergetic analysis of a residential CHP system based on PEM fuel cell," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(12), pages 4334-4342.
    5. Luo, Xing & Wang, Jihong & Dooner, Mark & Clarke, Jonathan, 2015. "Overview of current development in electrical energy storage technologies and the application potential in power system operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 511-536.
    6. Elkhan Richard Sadik-Zada, 2021. "Political Economy of Green Hydrogen Rollout: A Global Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-11, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Colbertaldo, Paolo & Guandalini, Giulio & Campanari, Stefano, 2018. "Modelling the integrated power and transport energy system: The role of power-to-gas and hydrogen in long-term scenarios for Italy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 592-601.
    2. Child, Michael & Kemfert, Claudia & Bogdanov, Dmitrii & Breyer, Christian, 2019. "Flexible electricity generation, grid exchange and storage for the transition to a 100% renewable energy system in Europe," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 139, pages 80-101.
    3. Copp, David A. & Nguyen, Tu A. & Byrne, Raymond H. & Chalamala, Babu R., 2022. "Optimal sizing of distributed energy resources for planning 100% renewable electric power systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    4. Jesús Fraile Ardanuy & Roberto Alvaro-Hermana & Sandra Castano-Solis & Julia Merino, 2022. "Carbon-Free Electricity Generation in Spain with PV–Storage Hybrid Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Mads Raunbak & Timo Zeyer & Kun Zhu & Martin Greiner, 2017. "Principal Mismatch Patterns Across a Simplified Highly Renewable European Electricity Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, November.
    6. Bjørnebye, Henrik & Hagem, Cathrine & Lind, Arne, 2018. "Optimal location of renewable power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1203-1215.
    7. Löffler, Konstantin & Burandt, Thorsten & Hainsch, Karlo & Oei, Pao-Yu & Seehaus, Frederik & Wejda, Felix, 2022. "Chances and barriers for Germany's low carbon transition - Quantifying uncertainties in key influential factors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    8. Chowdhury, Jahedul Islam & Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye & Goglio, Pietro & Hu, Yukun & Varga, Liz & McCabe, Leah, 2020. "Techno-environmental analysis of battery storage for grid level energy services," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    9. Sanghyun Hong & Barry W. Brook, 2018. "At the crossroads: An uncertain future facing the electricity‐generation sector in South Korea," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(3), pages 522-532, September.
    10. Javier L'opez Prol & Wolf-Peter Schill, 2020. "The Economics of Variable Renewables and Electricity Storage," Papers 2012.15371, arXiv.org.
    11. Zappa, William & Junginger, Martin & van den Broek, Machteld, 2019. "Is a 100% renewable European power system feasible by 2050?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 1027-1050.
    12. Barry W. Brook & Tom Blees & Tom M. L. Wigley & Sanghyun Hong, 2018. "Silver Buckshot or Bullet: Is a Future “Energy Mix” Necessary?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-14, January.
    13. Gallo, A.B. & Simões-Moreira, J.R. & Costa, H.K.M. & Santos, M.M. & Moutinho dos Santos, E., 2016. "Energy storage in the energy transition context: A technology review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 800-822.
    14. Gaure, Simen & Golombek, Rolf, 2022. "True or not true: CO2 free electricity generation is possible," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    15. Barbour, Edward & Wilson, I.A. Grant & Radcliffe, Jonathan & Ding, Yulong & Li, Yongliang, 2016. "A review of pumped hydro energy storage development in significant international electricity markets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 421-432.
    16. Hansen, Kenneth & Breyer, Christian & Lund, Henrik, 2019. "Status and perspectives on 100% renewable energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 471-480.
    17. He, Wei & Luo, Xing & Evans, David & Busby, Jonathan & Garvey, Seamus & Parkes, Daniel & Wang, Jihong, 2017. "Exergy storage of compressed air in cavern and cavern volume estimation of the large-scale compressed air energy storage system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 745-757.
    18. Diezmartínez, C.V., 2021. "Clean energy transition in Mexico: Policy recommendations for the deployment of energy storage technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    19. Miguel J. Prieto & Juan Á. Martínez & Rogelio Peón & Lourdes Á. Barcia & Fernando Nuño, 2017. "On the Convenience of Using Simulation Models to Optimize the Control Strategy of Molten-Salt Heat Storage Systems in Solar Thermal Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    20. Gils, Hans Christian & Gardian, Hedda & Kittel, Martin & Schill, Wolf-Peter & Zerrahn, Alexander & Murmann, Alexander & Launer, Jann & Fehler, Alexander & Gaumnitz, Felix & van Ouwerkerk, Jonas & Bußa, 2022. "Modeling flexibility in energy systems — comparison of power sector models based on simplified test cases," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:13:p:4801-:d:852634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.