IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i13p4708-d849005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Alternative to Index-Based Gas Sourcing Using Neural Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Stephan Schlüter

    (Department of Mathematics, Natural and Economic Sciences, Ulm University of Applied Scienes, 89075 Ulm, Germany
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Sejung Jung

    (Department of Convergence and Fusion System Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Sangju 37224, Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Andreas von Döllen

    (Wintershall Dea GmbH, 34119 Kassel, Germany
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Wonhee Lee

    (Department of Convergence and Fusion System Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Sangju 37224, Korea)

Abstract

An index on the gas market commonly refers to the average price of a certain trading product, e.g., over the period of one month. Index-based sourcing is a widely-used habit in modern gas business. Risks are reduced by averaging prices over the purchasing period. Due to the significant volume, there have been many attempts to ”beat the index”, i.e., to design a strategy that, over time, offers cheaper prices than the index. Here, we use neural networks to identify n , n ∈ N , optimal shopping points. Both classification- and forecasting-based strategies are tested to decide on each trading day if gas should be purchased or not. Thereby, we use the Front Month index based on prices from the Dutch Title Transfer Facility as an example. Regarding cumulative performance, all but a very simple myopic algorithm are able to outperform the index. However, each strategy has its flaws and some positive results are due to the price increase during 2021. If one opts for an active sourcing strategy, then a forecasting-based approach is the best choice.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephan Schlüter & Sejung Jung & Andreas von Döllen & Wonhee Lee, 2022. "An Alternative to Index-Based Gas Sourcing Using Neural Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-11, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:13:p:4708-:d:849005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/13/4708/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/13/4708/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thompson, Matt, 2016. "Natural gas storage valuation, optimization, market and credit risk management," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 26-44.
    2. Kim, Tae-Young & Cho, Sung-Bae, 2019. "Predicting residential energy consumption using CNN-LSTM neural networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 72-81.
    3. Renchu Guan & Aoqing Wang & Yanchun Liang & Jiasheng Fu & Xiaosong Han, 2022. "International Natural Gas Price Trends Prediction with Historical Prices and Related News," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Tim Hill & Marcus O'Connor & William Remus, 1996. "Neural Network Models for Time Series Forecasts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(7), pages 1082-1092, July.
    5. Longstaff, Francis A & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 2001. "Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach," University of California at Los Angeles, Anderson Graduate School of Management qt43n1k4jb, Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA.
    6. Longstaff, Francis A & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 2001. "Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 14(1), pages 113-147.
    7. Simon Liebermann & Jung-Sup Um & YoungSeok Hwang & Stephan Schlüter, 2021. "Performance Evaluation of Neural Network-Based Short-Term Solar Irradiation Forecasts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, May.
    8. Hulshof, Daan & van der Maat, Jan-Pieter & Mulder, Machiel, 2016. "Market fundamentals, competition and natural-gas prices," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 480-491.
    9. Wang, Jun & Cao, Junxing & Yuan, Shan & Cheng, Ming, 2021. "Short-term forecasting of natural gas prices by using a novel hybrid method based on a combination of the CEEMDAN-SE-and the PSO-ALS-optimized GRU network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Ludkovski & Aditya Maheshwari, 2018. "Simulation Methods for Stochastic Storage Problems: A Statistical Learning Perspective," Papers 1803.11309, arXiv.org.
    2. Alessio Trivella & Selvaprabu Nadarajah & Stein-Erik Fleten & Denis Mazieres & David Pisinger, 2021. "Managing Shutdown Decisions in Merchant Commodity and Energy Production: A Social Commerce Perspective," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 311-330, March.
    3. Fabian Dickmann & Nikolaus Schweizer, 2014. "Faster Comparison of Stopping Times by Nested Conditional Monte Carlo," Papers 1402.0243, arXiv.org.
    4. Work, James & Hauer, Grant & Luckert, M.K. (Marty), 2018. "What ethanol prices would induce growers to switch from agriculture to poplar in Alberta? A multiple options approach," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 51-62.
    5. Kathrin Glau & Ricardo Pachon & Christian Potz, 2019. "Speed-up credit exposure calculations for pricing and risk management," Papers 1912.01280, arXiv.org.
    6. Dong, Wenfeng & Kang, Boda, 2019. "Analysis of a multiple year gas sales agreement with make-up, carry-forward and indexation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 76-96.
    7. Pringles, Rolando & Olsina, Fernando & Penizzotto, Franco, 2020. "Valuation of defer and relocation options in photovoltaic generation investments by a stochastic simulation-based method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 846-864.
    8. Marta Biancardi & Giovanni Villani, 2017. "Robust Monte Carlo Method for R&D Real Options Valuation," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 49(3), pages 481-498, March.
    9. Gabriel J Power & Charli D. Tandja M. & Josée Bastien & Philippe Grégoire, 2015. "Measuring infrastructure investment option value," Journal of Risk Finance, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 16(1), pages 49-72, January.
    10. Stentoft, Lars, 2005. "Pricing American options when the underlying asset follows GARCH processes," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 576-611, September.
    11. O. Samimi & Z. Mardani & S. Sharafpour & F. Mehrdoust, 2017. "LSM Algorithm for Pricing American Option Under Heston–Hull–White’s Stochastic Volatility Model," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 50(2), pages 173-187, August.
    12. Mo, Jian-Lei & Schleich, Joachim & Zhu, Lei & Fan, Ying, 2015. "Delaying the introduction of emissions trading systems—Implications for power plant investment and operation from a multi-stage decision model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(PB), pages 255-264.
    13. Song-Ping Zhu & Xin-Jiang He, 2018. "A hybrid computational approach for option pricing," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(03), pages 1-16, September.
    14. Hári, Norbert & De Waegenaere, Anja & Melenberg, Bertrand & Nijman, Theo E., 2008. "Longevity risk in portfolios of pension annuities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 505-519, April.
    15. Arvesen, Ø. & Medbø, V. & Fleten, S.-E. & Tomasgard, A. & Westgaard, S., 2013. "Linepack storage valuation under price uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 155-164.
    16. Xuemei Gao & Dongya Deng & Yue Shan, 2014. "Lattice Methods for Pricing American Strangles with Two-Dimensional Stochastic Volatility Models," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-6, April.
    17. Giorgia Callegaro & Alessandro Gnoatto & Martino Grasselli, 2021. "A Fully Quantization-based Scheme for FBSDEs," Working Papers 07/2021, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    18. Marcelo G. Figueroa, 2006. "Pricing Multiple Interruptible-Swing Contracts," Birkbeck Working Papers in Economics and Finance 0606, Birkbeck, Department of Economics, Mathematics & Statistics.
    19. Hainaut, Donatien & Akbaraly, Adnane, 2023. "Risk management with Local Least Squares Monte-Carlo," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2023003, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    20. Idris Kharroubi & Nicolas Langren'e & Huy^en Pham, 2013. "A numerical algorithm for fully nonlinear HJB equations: an approach by control randomization," Papers 1311.4503, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:13:p:4708-:d:849005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.