IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2021i1p191-d713136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Effects of Logistics Performance on Energy Trade

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksandra Katarzyna Górecka

    (Department of Logistics, Institute of Economic and Finances, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Helga Pavlić Skender

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia)

  • Petra Adelajda Zaninović

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia)

Abstract

Logistics has become one of the most important economic sectors. It significantly affects the transport infrastructure and many other sectors that are crucial for the country’s development. It is the factor that also influences trade efficiency. However, the question arises if logistics performance is significant for the trade of critical goods which are energy raw products. The aim of the paper is primarily to investigate the EU energy trade flows in general and to estimate the effect of logistics performance on the international trade of energy raw products. The energy raw products are grouped into solid, liquid, and gaseous products, and separate estimates are made for their export and import. The analysis also differentiates between the trade flows, that is export and import within the EU and trade flows between EU member states and third countries. The empirical model is based on the theory of gravity model extended to include the six subcomponents of the Logistics Performance Index (LPI). The results present that: (1) the standard gravity model variables, such as GDPs of reporter and partner countries and contiguity, are successful in explaining the trade flows of solid and liquid raw energy but in case of gas products, are insignificant; (2) the results indicate that all logistics’ performance subcomponents are highly significant and show positive effects on the export of liquid energy products, while for the solid and gas products, it seems to be insignificant when the energy commodities are more complex and costly to transport and store, and therefore, contiguity, i.e., when countries share a common border, positively affects energy trade; (3) the EU imports most liquid energy products, but is generally very dependent on energy imports. EU policymakers should strive to either make more use of domestic resources or switch more to renewable energy sources.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksandra Katarzyna Górecka & Helga Pavlić Skender & Petra Adelajda Zaninović, 2021. "Assessing the Effects of Logistics Performance on Energy Trade," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2021:i:1:p:191-:d:713136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/1/191/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/1/191/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaofei Li & Fen Chen & Wei Wang, 2021. "Impact of Logistics Development on Economic Growth: An Empirical Research from Guangdong Province in China," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-12, May.
    2. Ziaul Haque Munim & Hans-Joachim Schramm, 2018. "The impacts of port infrastructure and logistics performance on economic growth: the mediating role of seaborne trade," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arif Imam Suroso, 2022. "The Effect of Logistics Performance Index Indicators on Palm Oil and Palm-Based Products Export: The Case of Indonesia and Malaysia," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Kaiwen Zhang, 2022. "The Effect of Logistics Performance Index of RCEP Countries on China's Export Trade," Review of Economic Assessment, Anser Press, vol. 1(1), pages 52-62, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gregory Whitten & Xiaoyi Dai & Simon Fan & Yu Pang, 2020. "Do political relations affect international trade? Evidence from China’s twelve trading partners," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-24, December.
    2. Mustafa Polat & Karahan Kara & Avni Zafer Acar, 2023. "Competitiveness based logistics performance index: An empirical analysis in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 24(2-3), pages 97-119, June.
    3. Deda Đelović, 2024. "Considerations on Prevention of Pollution from Ships in a Seaport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-24, June.
    4. Shikur, Zewdie Habte, 2022. "Logistics Performance, Export, Agricultural, Manufacturing, and Aggregate Economic Growth: A Focus on Sectoral Perspectives," Journal of Economic Development, The Economic Research Institute, Chung-Ang University, vol. 47(3), pages 107-123, September.
    5. W. Matekenya & R. Ncwadi, 2022. "The impact of maritime transport financing on total trade in South Africa," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Suneet Singh & Ashish Dwivedi & Saurabh Pratap, 2023. "Sustainable Maritime Freight Transportation: Current Status and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-23, April.
    7. Kahuina Miller & Tetsuro Hyodo, 2022. "Assessment of port efficiency within Latin America," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-27, December.
    8. Syed Abdul Rehman Khan & Danish Iqbal Godil & Zhang Yu & Farwa Abbas & Muhammad Asif Shamim, 2022. "Adoption of renewable energy sources, low‐carbon initiatives, and advanced logistical infrastructure—an step toward integrated global progress," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 275-288, February.
    9. Courage Mlambo, 2021. "The Impact of Port Performance on Trade: The Case of Selected African States," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-18, September.
    10. Baiqing Sun & Ramadhan Kauzen, 2023. "The Impact of Port Infrastructure and Economic Growth in Tanzania: Adopting a Structural Equation Modeling Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440221, January.
    11. Abban, Stanley, 2020. "The impact of institutions and infrastructure on intra-regional trade: The Economic Community of West African States," MPRA Paper 104382, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Elena Cigu & Daniela Tatiana Agheorghiesei & Anca Florentina Gavriluță (Vatamanu) & Elena Toader, 2018. "Transport Infrastructure Development, Public Performance and Long-Run Economic Growth: A Case Study for the Eu-28 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.
    13. A. H. M. Mehbub Anwar & Mohammad Altelmesani & Abdulrahman Alwosheel, 2024. "Unveiling the causal nexus between Saudi’s seaborne trade and economy: evidence from an ARDL model," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, December.
    14. Magazzino, Cosimo & Alola, Andrew Adewale & Schneider, Nicolas, 2021. "The trilemma of innovation, logistics performance, and environmental quality in 25 topmost logistics countries: a quantile regression evidence," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117654, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Sénquiz-Díaz Cynthia, 2021. "Effect Size of Logistics: Evidence from Selected Countries," LOGI – Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 123-134, January.
    16. Niclas Hoffmann & Robert Stahlbock & Stefan Voß, 2020. "A decision model on the repair and maintenance of shipping containers," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-21, December.
    17. Yujuan Guo & Abe P. L. Jong & Andy C. L. Yeung, 2018. "Quality management and international trade: institutionalization of quality standards and performance outcomes in China," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-10, December.
    18. Toby Roberts & Ian Williams & John Preston & Nick Clarke & Melinda Odum & Stefanie O'Gorman, 2021. "A Virtuous Circle? Increasing Local Benefits from Ports by Adopting Circular Economy Principles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-25, June.
    19. Viktor Shestak & Viktor Konstantinov & Vladislav Govorov & Evgenia Budko & Oleg Volodin, 2022. "Harmonization of Russian supply chain management standards with EU requirements," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(4), pages 759-777, August.
    20. Feiyan Han & Daming Wang & Bo Li, 2019. "Spillover Effects of Ports and Logistics Development on Economic Power: Evidence from the Chinese BTH Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-17, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2021:i:1:p:191-:d:713136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.