IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i9p2499-d544555.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Gate-to-Gate Life Cycle Assessment for the CO 2 -EOR Operations at Farnsworth Unit (FWU)

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony Morgan

    (Petroleum Recovery Research Center, New Mexico Tech, Socorro, NM 87801, USA)

  • Reid Grigg

    (Petroleum Recovery Research Center, New Mexico Tech, Socorro, NM 87801, USA)

  • William Ampomah

    (Petroleum Recovery Research Center, New Mexico Tech, Socorro, NM 87801, USA)

Abstract

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions related to the Farnsworth Unit’s (FWU) carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery (CO 2 -EOR) operations were accounted for through a gate-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA) for a period of about 10 years, since start of injection to 2020, and predictions of 18 additional years of the CO 2 -EOR operation were made. The CO 2 source for the FWU project has been 100% anthropogenically derived from the exhaust of an ethanol plant and a fertilizer plant. A cumulative amount of 5.25 × 10 6 tonnes of oil has been recovered through the injection of 1.64 × 10 6 tonnes of purchased CO 2 , of which 92% was stored during the 10-year period. An LCA analysis conducted on the various unit emissions of the FWU process yielded a net negative (positive storage) of 1.31 × 10 6 tonnes of CO 2 equivalent, representing 79% of purchased CO 2 . An optimized 18-year forecasted analysis estimated 86% storage of the forecasted 3.21 × 10 6 tonnes of purchased CO 2 with an equivalent 2.90 × 10 6 tonnes of crude oil produced by 2038. Major contributors to emissions were flaring/venting and energy usage for equipment. Improvements on the energy efficiency of equipment would reduce emissions further but this could be challenging. Improvement of injection capacity and elimination of venting/flaring or fugitive gas are methods more likely to be utilized for reducing net emissions and are the cases used for the optimized scenario in this work. This LCA illustrated the potential for the CO 2 -EOR operations in the FWU to store more CO 2 with minimal emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony Morgan & Reid Grigg & William Ampomah, 2021. "A Gate-to-Gate Life Cycle Assessment for the CO 2 -EOR Operations at Farnsworth Unit (FWU)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:2499-:d:544555
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/9/2499/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/9/2499/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pål Østebø Andersen, 2023. "Editor’s Choice: Advances in Carbon Capture Subsurface Storage and Utilization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-4, February.
    2. Jonathan Asante & William Ampomah & Dylan Rose-Coss & Martha Cather & Robert Balch, 2021. "Probabilistic Assessment and Uncertainty Analysis of CO 2 Storage Capacity of the Morrow B Sandstone—Farnsworth Field Unit," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:2499-:d:544555. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.