IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i2p416-d479851.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno-Cost-Benefit Analysis of Biogas Production from Industrial Cassava Starch Wastewater in Thailand for Optimal Utilization with Energy Storage

Author

Listed:
  • Chatree Wattanasilp

    (Division of Energy Management Technology, School of Energy, Environment and Materials, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi 126 Pracha Uthit Rd., Bang Mod, Thung Khru, Bangkok 10140, Thailand)

  • Roongrojana Songprakorp

    (Division of Energy Technology, School of Energy, Environment and Materials, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi 126 Pracha Uthit Rd., Bang Mod, Thung Khru, Bangkok 10140, Thailand)

  • Annop Nopharatana

    (Excellent Center of Waste Utilization and Management (EcoWaste), Pilot Plant Development and Training Institute, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi (Bangkuntien) 83 Moo 8 Thakham, Bangkuntien, Bangkok 10150, Thailand)

  • Charoenchai Khompatraporn

    (Production Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi 126 Pracha Uthit Rd., Bang Mod, Thung Khru, Bangkok 10140, Thailand)

Abstract

This paper applied the optimization model of the biogas utilization pathway with the biogas utilization availability assessment to examine the effect of biogas system parameters on biogas utilization. The model analyzes the biogas utilization pathway availability and maximum profit to value added and productivity in biogas from industry wastewater in Thailand. The results showed that profit and availability of biogas utilization reduce biogas loss to flare, that it entails several conversion processes. The scenario for the biogas utilization pathway and storage with biogas production technology improves. Evaluated are operation time, waste and energy demand to the cassava starch usage during the production for 50–1000 tons per day. Five mature biogas production technologies were benchmarked evaluated based on the chemical oxygen demand removal efficiency and biogas yields. Subsequently, low-, medium-, and high-pressure storages and a battery storage were considered and discussed in this paper as suitable energy storage for each desired biogas plant operation. Five biogas utilization pathways, including converting biogas into thermal energy, generating electricity, and upgrading biogas to compressed biogas, were then compared. Those improved options in the scenario select suitable biogas technologies, storage, and application for value-added, reduce the environmental problems and renewable energy production from wastewater.

Suggested Citation

  • Chatree Wattanasilp & Roongrojana Songprakorp & Annop Nopharatana & Charoenchai Khompatraporn, 2021. "Techno-Cost-Benefit Analysis of Biogas Production from Industrial Cassava Starch Wastewater in Thailand for Optimal Utilization with Energy Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-22, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:2:p:416-:d:479851
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/2/416/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/2/416/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johnston, Lewis & Díaz-González, Francisco & Gomis-Bellmunt, Oriol & Corchero-García, Cristina & Cruz-Zambrano, Miguel, 2015. "Methodology for the economic optimisation of energy storage systems for frequency support in wind power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 660-669.
    2. Mustafa E. Amiryar & Keith R. Pullen, 2019. "Assessment of the Carbon and Cost Savings of a Combined Diesel Generator, Solar Photovoltaic, and Flywheel Energy Storage Islanded Grid System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-25, August.
    3. Upadhyay, Subho & Sharma, M.P., 2015. "Development of hybrid energy system with cycle charging strategy using particle swarm optimization for a remote area in India," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 586-598.
    4. Mudasser, Muhammad & Yiridoe, Emmanuel K. & Corscadden, Kenneth, 2015. "Cost-benefit analysis of grid-connected wind–biogas hybrid energy production, by turbine capacity and site," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 573-582.
    5. Pipatmanomai, Suneerat & Kaewluan, Sommas & Vitidsant, Tharapong, 2009. "Economic assessment of biogas-to-electricity generation system with H2S removal by activated carbon in small pig farm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(5), pages 669-674, May.
    6. Kapdi, S.S. & Vijay, V.K. & Rajesh, S.K. & Prasad, Rajendra, 2005. "Biogas scrubbing, compression and storage: perspective and prospectus in Indian context," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(8), pages 1195-1202.
    7. Osorio, F. & Torres, J.C., 2009. "Biogas purification from anaerobic digestion in a wastewater treatment plant for biofuel production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 2164-2171.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Júlio Ximenes & André Siqueira & Ewa Kochańska & Rafał M. Łukasik, 2021. "Valorisation of Agri- and Aquaculture Residues via Biogas Production for Enhanced Industrial Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kadam, Rahul & Panwar, N.L., 2017. "Recent advancement in biogas enrichment and its applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 892-903.
    2. Zhang, Yuyao & Kawasaki, Yu & Oshita, Kazuyuki & Takaoka, Masaki & Minami, Daisuke & Inoue, Go & Tanaka, Toshihiro, 2021. "Economic assessment of biogas purification systems for removal of both H2S and siloxane from biogas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 119-130.
    3. Yilmaz, Saban & Dincer, Furkan, 2017. "Optimal design of hybrid PV-Diesel-Battery systems for isolated lands: A case study for Kilis, Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 344-352.
    4. Di Capua, Francesco & Spasiano, Danilo & Giordano, Andrea & Adani, Fabrizio & Fratino, Umberto & Pirozzi, Francesco & Esposito, Giovanni, 2020. "High-solid anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge: challenges and opportunities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    5. Saadabadi, S. Ali & Thallam Thattai, Aditya & Fan, Liyuan & Lindeboom, Ralph E.F. & Spanjers, Henri & Aravind, P.V., 2019. "Solid Oxide Fuel Cells fuelled with biogas: Potential and constraints," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 194-214.
    6. Bharathiraja, B. & Sudharsana, T. & Jayamuthunagai, J. & Praveenkumar, R. & Chozhavendhan, S. & Iyyappan, J., 2018. "Biogas production – A review on composition, fuel properties, feed stock and principles of anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 570-582.
    7. Tippayawong, N. & Thanompongchart, P., 2010. "Biogas quality upgrade by simultaneous removal of CO2 and H2S in a packed column reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 4531-4535.
    8. Cristiano, Djema Maria & de A. Mohedano, Rodrigo & Nadaleti, Willian Cézar & de Castilhos Junior, Armando B. & Lourenço, Vitor Alves & Gonçalves, Débora F.H. & Filho, Paulo Belli, 2020. "H2S adsorption on nanostructured iron oxide at room temperature for biogas purification: Application of renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 151-160.
    9. Carolinne Secco & Maria Eduarda Kounaris Fuziki & Angelo Marcelo Tusset & Giane Gonçalves Lenzi, 2023. "Reactive Processes for H 2 S Removal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-14, February.
    10. Bhatt, Ankit & Sharma, M.P. & Saini, R.P., 2016. "Feasibility and sensitivity analysis of an off-grid micro hydro–photovoltaic–biomass and biogas–diesel–battery hybrid energy system for a remote area in Uttarakhand state, India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 53-69.
    11. Abhinav Choudhury & Stephanie Lansing, 2019. "Methane and Hydrogen Sulfide Production from Co-Digestion of Gummy Waste with a Food Waste, Grease Waste, and Dairy Manure Mixture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-12, November.
    12. Morin, Philippe & Marcos, Bernard & Moresoli, Christine & Laflamme, Claude B., 2010. "Economic and environmental assessment on the energetic valorization of organic material for a municipality in Quebec, Canada," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 275-283, January.
    13. Sachs, Julia & Sawodny, Oliver, 2016. "Multi-objective three stage design optimization for island microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 789-800.
    14. Bidart, Christian & Fröhling, Magnus & Schultmann, Frank, 2014. "Electricity and substitute natural gas generation from the conversion of wastewater treatment plant sludge," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 404-413.
    15. Seckin, Candeniz & Bayulken, Ahmet R., 2013. "Extended Exergy Accounting (EEA) analysis of municipal wastewater treatment – Determination of environmental remediation cost for municipal wastewater," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 55-64.
    16. Rasheed, Rizwan & Tahir, Fizza & Yasar, Abdullah & Sharif, Faiza & Tabinda, Amtul Bari & Ahmad, Sajid Rashid & Wang, Yubo & Su, Yuehong, 2022. "Environmental life cycle analysis of a modern commercial-scale fibreglass composite-based biogas scrubbing system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1261-1271.
    17. Pablo Fernández-Bustamante & Oscar Barambones & Isidro Calvo & Cristian Napole & Mohamed Derbeli, 2021. "Provision of Frequency Response from Wind Farms: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-24, October.
    18. Lopez, A. & Ogayar, B. & Hernández, J.C. & Sutil, F.S., 2020. "Survey and assessment of technical and economic features for the provision of frequency control services by household-prosumers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    19. Morstyn, Thomas & Chilcott, Martin & McCulloch, Malcolm D., 2019. "Gravity energy storage with suspended weights for abandoned mine shafts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 201-206.
    20. Parihar, Amit Kumar Singh & Sethi, Virendra & Banerjee, Rangan, 2019. "Sizing of biomass based distributed hybrid power generation systems in India," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1400-1422.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:2:p:416-:d:479851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.