IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i23p8030-d692769.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reburning of Animal Waste Based Biomass with Coal for NO x Reduction, Part I: Feedlot Biomass (FB) and Coal:FB Blends

Author

Listed:
  • Hyukjin Oh

    (Mechanical Engineering, Texas Engineering Experiment Station, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
    Energy Resources Research Department, Research Institute of Industrial Science & Technology (RIST), Pohang 790-600, Korea)

  • Kalyan Annamalai

    (Mechanical Engineering, Texas Engineering Experiment Station, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

  • Paul G. Goughner

    (Mechanical Engineering, Texas Engineering Experiment Station, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
    Completion Engineering Advisors, LLC, P.O. Box 134, Wylie, TX 75098, USA)

  • Ben Thien

    (Mechanical Engineering, Texas Engineering Experiment Station, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
    Scientific Applications & Research Associates, (SARA) Inc., Cypress, CA 90630, USA)

  • John M. Sweeten

    (Texas Agri-Life Research, Texas A&M University, Amarillo, TX 70106, USA)

Abstract

Cattle biomass (CB or manure from cattle) is proposed as reburn fuel under slightly fuel-rich conditions. The CB includes wastes from cattle feedlots (cattle grown in feedlots to slaughter weights of 450–640 kg) termed as Feedlot Biomass (FB) and cattle wastes from dairy farms termed as Dairy Biomass (DB). NO x emissions from coal-fired power plants can be reduced by using pure CB and Coal:CB mixtures as reburn fuels (10~30% by heat) injected after the primary combustion region. Experiments with Coal:CB mixtures as reburn fuels were performed using the 30 kW burner facility. Part I deals with results from experiments using pure FB and Coal:FB blends as reburn fuels while Part II presents results on extent of NO x reduction using pure DB and Coal:DB blends as reburn fuels (RF). In the current work, results on NO x emission are presented with FB and Coal:FB blends as RF. The parametric studies include: equivalence ratio in reburn zone (ER RBZ ), vitiated air, angle of reburn nozzles, presence and absence of heat exchangers (HEXs), and baseline NO x concentration. The optimum operating conditions for FB reburning were found to be conditions with vitiation at ERRBZ = 1.1 with 45° upward counter-current injection in the presence of HEXs. NO x emissions were reduced by as much as 96%.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyukjin Oh & Kalyan Annamalai & Paul G. Goughner & Ben Thien & John M. Sweeten, 2021. "Reburning of Animal Waste Based Biomass with Coal for NO x Reduction, Part I: Feedlot Biomass (FB) and Coal:FB Blends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-26, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:23:p:8030-:d:692769
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/23/8030/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/23/8030/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Savolainen, Kati, 2003. "Co-firing of biomass in coal-fired utility boilers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(3-4), pages 369-381, March.
    2. Lawrence, Ben & Annamalai, Kalyan & Sweeten, John M. & Heflin, Kevin, 2009. "Cofiring coal and dairy biomass in a 29Â kWt furnace," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(11), pages 2359-2372, November.
    3. Hyukjin Oh & Kalyan Annamalai & John M. Sweeten & Kevin Heflin, 2021. "Reburning of Animal Waste Based Biomass with Coals for NO x Reduction, Part II: Dairy Biomass (DB) and Coal–DB Blends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, December.
    4. Junga, Robert & Knauer, Waldemar & Niemiec, Patrycja & Tańczuk, Mariusz, 2017. "Experimental tests of co-combustion of laying hens manure with coal by using thermogravimetric analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 245-255.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hyukjin Oh & Kalyan Annamalai & John M. Sweeten & Kevin Heflin, 2021. "Reburning of Animal Waste Based Biomass with Coals for NO x Reduction, Part II: Dairy Biomass (DB) and Coal–DB Blends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hyukjin Oh & Kalyan Annamalai & John M. Sweeten & Kevin Heflin, 2021. "Reburning of Animal Waste Based Biomass with Coals for NO x Reduction, Part II: Dairy Biomass (DB) and Coal–DB Blends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, December.
    2. Emmanouil Karampinis & Panagiotis Grammelis & Michalis Agraniotis & Ioannis Violidakis & Emmanuel Kakaras, 2014. "Co-firing of biomass with coal in thermal power plants: technology schemes, impacts, and future perspectives," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(4), pages 384-399, July.
    3. Karampinis, E. & Nikolopoulos, N. & Nikolopoulos, A. & Grammelis, P. & Kakaras, E., 2012. "Numerical investigation Greek lignite/cardoon co-firing in a tangentially fired furnace," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 514-524.
    4. Liang, Zhanwei & Chen, Hongwei & Zhao, Bin & Jia, Jiandong & Cheng, Kai, 2018. "Synergetic effects of firing gases/coal blends and adopting deep air staging on combustion characteristics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 499-511.
    5. Małgorzata Wzorek & Robert Junga & Ersel Yilmaz & Bohdan Bozhenko, 2021. "Thermal Decomposition of Olive-Mill Byproducts: A TG-FTIR Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Junga, Robert & Pospolita, Janusz & Niemiec, Patrycja, 2020. "Combustion and grindability characteristics of palm kernel shells torrefied in a pilot-scale installation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1239-1250.
    7. Loeffler, Dan & Anderson, Nathaniel, 2014. "Emissions tradeoffs associated with cofiring forest biomass with coal: A case study in Colorado, USA," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 67-77.
    8. Yoonah Jeong & Jae-Sung Kim & Ye-Eun Lee & Dong-Chul Shin & Kwang-Ho Ahn & Jinhong Jung & Kyeong-Ho Kim & Min-Jong Ku & Seung-Mo Kim & Chung-Hwan Jeon & I-Tae Kim, 2023. "Investigation and Optimization of Co-Combustion Efficiency of Food Waste Biochar and Coal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-12, October.
    9. Guo, Feihong & He, Yi & Hassanpour, Ali & Gardy, Jabbar & Zhong, Zhaoping, 2020. "Thermogravimetric analysis on the co-combustion of biomass pellets with lignite and bituminous coal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    10. Tae-Yong Jeong & Lkhagvadorj Sh & Jong-Ho Kim & Byoung-Hwa Lee & Chung-Hwan Jeon, 2019. "Experimental Investigation of Ash Deposit Behavior during Co-Combustion of Bituminous Coal with Wood Pellets and Empty Fruit Bunches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, May.
    11. Yuan, Xinsong & He, Tao & Cao, Hongliang & Yuan, Qiaoxia, 2017. "Cattle manure pyrolysis process: Kinetic and thermodynamic analysis with isoconversional methods," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 489-496.
    12. Zhang, Chuan & Zhou, Li & Chhabra, Pulkit & Garud, Sushant S. & Aditya, Kevin & Romagnoli, Alessandro & Comodi, Gabriele & Dal Magro, Fabio & Meneghetti, Antonella & Kraft, Markus, 2016. "A novel methodology for the design of waste heat recovery network in eco-industrial park using techno-economic analysis and multi-objective optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 88-102.
    13. Huang, Junxuan & Liao, Yanfen & Lin, Jianhua & Dou, Changjiang & Huang, Zengxiu & Yu, Xiongwei & Yu, Zhaosheng & Chen, Chunxiang & Ma, Xiaoqian, 2024. "Numerical simulation of the co-firing of pulverized coal and eucalyptus wood in a 1000MWth opposed wall-fired boiler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    14. Liu, Jin & Wu, Jianguo & Liu, Fengqiao & Han, Xingguo, 2012. "Quantitative assessment of bioenergy from crop stalk resources in Inner Mongolia, China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 305-318.
    15. Dong, Leilei & Alexiadis, Alessio, 2023. "Simulation of char burnout characteristics of biomass/coal blend with a simplified single particle reaction model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    16. Restrepo, Álvaro & Bazzo, Edson, 2016. "Co-firing: An exergoenvironmental analysis applied to power plants modified for burning coal and rice straw," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 107-119.
    17. Sandberg, Jan & Karlsson, Christer & Fdhila, Rebei Bel, 2011. "A 7Â year long measurement period investigating the correlation of corrosion, deposit and fuel in a biomass fired circulated fluidized bed boiler," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 99-110, January.
    18. Kallio, A. Maarit I. & Anttila, Perttu & McCormick, Megan & Asikainen, Antti, 2011. "Are the Finnish targets for the energy use of forest chips realistic--Assessment with a spatial market model," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 110-126, April.
    19. Turzyński, Tomasz & Kluska, Jacek & Kardaś, Dariusz, 2022. "Study on chicken manure combustion and heat production in terms of thermal self-sufficiency of a poultry farm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 84-91.
    20. Jan Hari Arti Khalsa & Diana Leistner & Nadja Weller & Leilani I. Darvell & Ben Dooley, 2016. "Torrefied Biomass Pellets—Comparing Grindability in Different Laboratory Mills," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-15, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:23:p:8030-:d:692769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.