IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i22p7686-d680954.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Effects of Failure of a Gas Pipeline Caused by a Mechanical Damage

Author

Listed:
  • Andrzej Rusin

    (Department of Power Engineering and Turbomachinery, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Stolecka-Antczak

    (Department of Power Engineering and Turbomachinery, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

  • Krzysztof Kapusta

    (Central Mining Institute, 40-166 Katowice, Poland)

  • Krzysztof Rogoziński

    (Department of Power Engineering and Turbomachinery, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

  • Krzysztof Rusin

    (Department of Power Engineering and Turbomachinery, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

Abstract

Natural gas continues to be one of the basic energy sources used as fuel in the power sector, in industries and in households. The potential and attractiveness of this fuel is gaining special significance in the current energy transitions from coal-based power engineering to power generation based on renewable energy sources. Natural gas is supplied to consumers mainly through a network of pipelines, which ensures a relatively high reliability of the supply. Still, failures occur due to the corrosion of pipeline walls, material defects or human errors, which can result in uncontrolled release of gas. The released gas can trigger dangerous phenomena, such as fires and explosions. This paper presents an analysis of the causes and effects of damage to a medium-pressure pipeline caused by earthworks carried out within an area where a pipeline is located. Holes in the pipeline due to the impact of an excavator bucket are analysed. The impact of the excavator bucket may cause a rupture equal to 50% of the pipeline’s cross-sectional area. Hazard zones related to fires and explosions due to the released natural gas are presented. For the analysed pipeline with a diameter of 0.5 m and a gas pressure of 5 MPa, the range of hazard zones arising due to pipeline damage caused by an excavator bucket can reach about 200 m.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrzej Rusin & Katarzyna Stolecka-Antczak & Krzysztof Kapusta & Krzysztof Rogoziński & Krzysztof Rusin, 2021. "Analysis of the Effects of Failure of a Gas Pipeline Caused by a Mechanical Damage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:22:p:7686-:d:680954
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/22/7686/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/22/7686/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrzej J. Osiadacz & Niccolo Isoli, 2020. "Multi-Objective Optimization of Gas Pipeline Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, October.
    2. David A. Anderson, 2020. "Natural Gas Transmission Pipelines: Risks and Remedies for Host Communities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-10, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Labiba Noshin Asha & Ying Huang & Nita Yodo & Haitao Liao, 2023. "A Quantitative Approach of Measuring Sustainability Risk in Pipeline Infrastructure Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Andrzej Rusin & Katarzyna Stolecka-Antczak, 2023. "Assessment of the Safety of Transport of the Natural Gas–Ammonia Mixture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-20, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiandong Duan & Fan Liu & Yao Yang & Zhuanting Jin, 2021. "Flexible Dispatch for Integrated Power and Gas Systems Considering Power-to-Gas and Demand Response," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-26, September.
    2. Huseyin Ayhan Yavasoglu & Ilhami Unal & Ahmet Koksoy & Kursad Gokce & Yusuf Engin Tetik, 2023. "Long-Range Wireless Communication for In-Line Inspection Robot: 2.4 km On-Site Test," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    3. David A. Anderson, 2020. "Environmental Exigencies and the Efficient Voter Rule," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-7, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:22:p:7686-:d:680954. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.