IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i20p6603-d655357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of Combined Heating Systems Involving the Use of Renewable Energy for Greenhouse Heating

Author

Listed:
  • Chung-Geon Lee

    (Agriculture and Life Sciences Research Institute, Kangwon National University, Hyoja 2 Dong 192-1, Chuncheon-si 24341, Korea)

  • La-Hoon Cho

    (Department of Interdisciplinary Program in Smart Agriculture, Kangwon National University, Hyoja 2 Dong 192-1, Chuncheon-si 24341, Korea)

  • Seok-Jun Kim

    (Department of Interdisciplinary Program in Smart Agriculture, Kangwon National University, Hyoja 2 Dong 192-1, Chuncheon-si 24341, Korea)

  • Sun-Yong Park

    (Department of Interdisciplinary Program in Smart Agriculture, Kangwon National University, Hyoja 2 Dong 192-1, Chuncheon-si 24341, Korea)

  • Dae-Hyun Kim

    (Department of Biosystems Engineering, Kangwon National University, Hyoja 2 Dong 192-1, Chuncheon-si 24341, Korea)

Abstract

The continued use of fossil fuels is contributing to severe environmental pollution and the establishment of an abnormal climate; consequently, alternative renewable energy sources are being actively investigated worldwide. Further, following global trends, numerous countermeasures aimed at improving carbon neutrality, promoting sustainable agriculture, and reducing fossil fuel dependence are being implemented in the Republic of Korea. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the application of renewable energies for greenhouse heating in the Republic of Korea. Three hybrid systems, numbered 1–3, were constructed using a pellet boiler, hydrothermal heat pump, and solar heat collection system, respectively. Thereafter, the heating performance, combined heat efficiency, energy consumption per temperature lifting, and energy cost per temperature lifting of the systems were compared. The combined thermal efficiency results showed no significant differences. However, in terms of energy consumption and cost, hybrid system 1 demonstrated 25.7 and 24.1% savings, respectively, compared with the other systems. Moreover, based on economic analysis via the net present value and life cycle cost analysis methods, the system reduced costs by 29.2 and 27.7%, respectively, compared with conventional fossil fuel boilers. Thus, hybrid system 1 was identified as the most economical system.

Suggested Citation

  • Chung-Geon Lee & La-Hoon Cho & Seok-Jun Kim & Sun-Yong Park & Dae-Hyun Kim, 2021. "Comparative Analysis of Combined Heating Systems Involving the Use of Renewable Energy for Greenhouse Heating," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-22, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:20:p:6603-:d:655357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/20/6603/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/20/6603/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sithole, H. & Cockerill, T.T. & Hughes, K.J. & Ingham, D.B. & Ma, L. & Porter, R.T.J. & Pourkashanian, M., 2016. "Developing an optimal electricity generation mix for the UK 2050 future," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 363-373.
    2. Chau, J. & Sowlati, T. & Sokhansanj, S. & Preto, F. & Melin, S. & Bi, X., 2009. "Economic sensitivity of wood biomass utilization for greenhouse heating application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(5), pages 616-621, May.
    3. Potrč, Sanja & Čuček, Lidija & Martin, Mariano & Kravanja, Zdravko, 2021. "Sustainable renewable energy supply networks optimization – The gradual transition to a renewable energy system within the European Union by 2050," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chung-Geon Lee & La-Hoon Cho & Seok-Jun Kim & Sun-Yong Park & Dae-Hyun Kim, 2022. "Prediction Model for the Internal Temperature of a Greenhouse with a Water-to-Water Heat Pump Using a Pellet Boiler as a Heat Source Using Building Energy Simulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Trond Thorgeir Harsem & Behrouz Nourozi & Amirmohammad Behzadi & Sasan Sadrizadeh, 2021. "Design and Parametric Investigation of an Efficient Heating System, an Effort to Obtain a Higher Seasonal Performance Factor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-13, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chung-Geon Lee & La-Hoon Cho & Seok-Jun Kim & Sun-Yong Park & Dae-Hyun Kim, 2022. "Prediction Model for the Internal Temperature of a Greenhouse with a Water-to-Water Heat Pump Using a Pellet Boiler as a Heat Source Using Building Energy Simulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Hobley, Alexander, 2019. "Will gas be gone in the United Kingdom (UK) by 2050? An impact assessment of urban heat decarbonisation and low emission vehicle uptake on future UK energy system scenarios," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 695-705.
    3. Nikolaos Apostolopoulos & Alexandros Kakouris & Panagiotis Liargovas & Petar Borisov & Teodor Radev & Sotiris Apostolopoulos & Sofia Daskou & Eleni Ε. Anastasopoulou, 2023. "Just Transition Policies, Power Plant Workers and Green Entrepreneurs in Greece, Cyprus and Bulgaria: Can Education and Retraining Meet the Challenge?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-21, November.
    4. Łukasz Augustowski & Piotr Kułyk, 2024. "Conditions for the Development of Wind Energy for Individual Consumers: A Case Study in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-13, July.
    5. Yavari, Mohammad & Bohreghi, Iman Mohammadi, 2025. "Developing a green-resilient power network and supply chain: Integrating renewable and traditional energy sources in the face of disruptions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PC).
    6. Kamila Słupińska & Marek Wieruszewski & Piotr Szczypa & Anna Kożuch & Krzysztof Adamowicz, 2022. "Public Perception of the Use of Woody Biomass for Energy Purposes in the Evaluation of Content and Information Management on the Internet," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-11, September.
    7. Mahbub, Md Shahriar & Viesi, Diego & Cattani, Sara & Crema, Luigi, 2017. "An innovative multi-objective optimization approach for long-term energy planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 1487-1504.
    8. Marucci, Alvaro & Cappuccini, Andrea, 2016. "Dynamic photovoltaic greenhouse: Energy efficiency in clear sky conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 362-376.
    9. Chen, Jiaoliao & Xu, Fang & Tan, Dapeng & Shen, Zheng & Zhang, Libin & Ai, Qinglin, 2015. "A control method for agricultural greenhouses heating based on computational fluid dynamics and energy prediction model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 106-118.
    10. Scott, Ian J. & Carvalho, Pedro M.S. & Botterud, Audun & Silva, Carlos A., 2021. "Long-term uncertainties in generation expansion planning: Implications for electricity market modelling and policy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    11. Shizhong Song & Pei Liu & Jing Xu & Linwei Ma & Chinhao Chong & Min He & Xianzheng Huang & Zheng Li & Weidou Ni, 2016. "An Economic and Policy Analysis of a District Heating System Using Corn Straw Densified Fuel: A Case Study in Nong’an County in Jilin Province, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, December.
    12. Sung-Yoon Huh & Chul-Yong Lee, 2017. "A Demand-Side Perspective on Developing a Future Electricity Generation Mix: Identifying Heterogeneity in Social Preferences," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    13. Juan D. Gil & Jerónimo Ramos-Teodoro & José A. Romero-Ramos & Rodrigo Escobar & José M. Cardemil & Cynthia Giagnocavo & Manuel Pérez, 2021. "Demand-Side Optimal Sizing of a Solar Energy–Biomass Hybrid System for Isolated Greenhouse Environments: Methodology and Application Example," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    14. Hooshmandzade, Niusha & Motevali, Ali & Reza Mousavi Seyedi, Seyed & Biparva, Pouria, 2021. "Influence of single and hybrid water-based nanofluids on performance of microgrid photovoltaic/thermal system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    15. Masoomi, Behzad & Sahebi, Iman Ghasemian & Gholian-Jouybari, Fatemeh & Mejia-Argueta, Christopher & Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, Mostafa, 2024. "The role of internet of things adoption on the sustainability performance of the renewable energy supply chain: A conceptual framework," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    16. Vadim V. Ponkratov & Alexey S. Kuznetsov & Iskandar Muda & Miftahul Jannah Nasution & Mohammed Al-Bahrani & Hikmet Ş. Aybar, 2022. "Investigating the Index of Sustainable Development and Reduction in Greenhouse Gases of Renewable Energies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-13, November.
    17. Hassan, Qusay & Nassar, Ahmed K. & Al-Jiboory, Ali Khudhair & Viktor, Patrik & Telba, Ahmad A. & Awwad, Emad Mahrous & Amjad, Ayesha & Fakhruldeen, Hassan Falah & Algburi, Sameer & Mashkoor, Saoud Cha, 2024. "Mapping Europe renewable energy landscape: Insights into solar, wind, hydro, and green hydrogen production," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    18. Li, Hui & Liu, Xinhua & Legros, Robert & Bi, Xiaotao T. & Jim Lim, C. & Sokhansanj, Shahab, 2012. "Pelletization of torrefied sawdust and properties of torrefied pellets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 680-685.
    19. Parascanu, M.M. & Puig-Gamero, M. & Soreanu, G. & Valverde, J.L. & Sanchez-Silva, L., 2019. "Comparison of three Mexican biomasses valorization through combustion and gasification: Environmental and economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    20. Wang, Changbo & Chang, Yuan & Zhang, Lixiao & Pang, Mingyue & Hao, Yan, 2017. "A life-cycle comparison of the energy, environmental and economic impacts of coal versus wood pellets for generating heat in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 374-384.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:20:p:6603-:d:655357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.