IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i8p2042-d347791.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Deep-Learning-Based Oil-Well-Testing Stage Interpretation Model Integrating Multi-Feature Extraction Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Feng

    (State Key Laboratory of Precision Measuring Technology and Instruments, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Qiang Feng

    (CNPC Bohai Drilling Engineering Company Ltd., Tianjin 300457, China)

  • Shaohui Li

    (Tianjin Research Institute of Water Transport Engineering, Tianjin 300000, China)

  • Xingwei Hou

    (State Key Laboratory of Precision Measuring Technology and Instruments, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Shugui Liu

    (State Key Laboratory of Precision Measuring Technology and Instruments, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

Abstract

The interpretation of well-testing data is a key means of decision-making support for oil and gas field development. However, conventional processing methods have many problems, such as the stochastic nature of the data, feature redundancies, the randomness of the initial weights or thresholds, and fluctuations in the generalization ability with slight changes in the network parameters. These result in a poor ability to characterize data features and a low generalization ability of the interpretation models. We propose a new integrated well-testing interpretation model based on a multi-feature extraction method and deep mutual information classifiers (MFE-DMIC). This model can avoid the low model classification accuracy caused by the simple training structures, lacking of redundancy elimination, and the non-optimal classifier configuration parameters. First, we obtained the initial features according to four classical feature extraction methods. Then, we eliminated feature redundancies using a deep belief network and united the maximum information coefficient method to achieve feature purification. Finally, we calculated the interpretation results using a hybrid particle swarm optimization–support vector machine classification system. We used 572 well-testing field samples, including five working stages, for model training and testing. The results show that the MFE-DMIC model had the highest total stage classification accuracy of 98.18% as well as the least of features (nine) compared with the classical feature extraction and classification methods and their combinations. The proposed model can reduce the efforts of oil analysts and allow accurate labeling of samples to be predicted.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Feng & Qiang Feng & Shaohui Li & Xingwei Hou & Shugui Liu, 2020. "A Deep-Learning-Based Oil-Well-Testing Stage Interpretation Model Integrating Multi-Feature Extraction Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:8:p:2042-:d:347791
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/8/2042/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/8/2042/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chujie Tian & Jian Ma & Chunhong Zhang & Panpan Zhan, 2018. "A Deep Neural Network Model for Short-Term Load Forecast Based on Long Short-Term Memory Network and Convolutional Neural Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-13, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iztok Podbregar & Goran Šimić & Mirjana Radovanović & Sanja Filipović & Polona Šprajc, 2020. "International Energy Security Risk Index—Analysis of the Methodological Settings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-15, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Md. Nazmul Hasan & Rafia Nishat Toma & Abdullah-Al Nahid & M M Manjurul Islam & Jong-Myon Kim, 2019. "Electricity Theft Detection in Smart Grid Systems: A CNN-LSTM Based Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Shree Krishna Acharya & Young-Min Wi & Jaehee Lee, 2019. "Short-Term Load Forecasting for a Single Household Based on Convolution Neural Networks Using Data Augmentation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Sepehr Moalem & Roya M. Ahari & Ghazanfar Shahgholian & Majid Moazzami & Seyed Mohammad Kazemi, 2022. "Long-Term Electricity Demand Forecasting in the Steel Complex Micro-Grid Electricity Supply Chain—A Coupled Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Bulent Haznedar & Huseyin Cagan Kilinc & Furkan Ozkan & Adem Yurtsever, 2023. "Streamflow forecasting using a hybrid LSTM-PSO approach: the case of Seyhan Basin," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(1), pages 681-701, May.
    5. Kanitta Yarak & Apichon Witayangkurn & Kunnaree Kritiyutanont & Chomchanok Arunplod & Ryosuke Shibasaki, 2021. "Oil Palm Tree Detection and Health Classification on High-Resolution Imagery Using Deep Learning," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Myoungsoo Kim & Wonik Choi & Youngjun Jeon & Ling Liu, 2019. "A Hybrid Neural Network Model for Power Demand Forecasting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Wu, Jingyao & Zhao, Zhibin & Sun, Chuang & Yan, Ruqiang & Chen, Xuefeng, 2021. "Learning from Class-imbalanced Data with a Model-Agnostic Framework for Machine Intelligent Diagnosis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    8. Gillmann, Niels & Kim, Alisa, 2021. "Quantification of Economic Uncertainty: a deep learning approach," VfS Annual Conference 2021 (Virtual Conference): Climate Economics 242421, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    9. Stanislaw Osowski & Robert Szmurlo & Krzysztof Siwek & Tomasz Ciechulski, 2022. "Neural Approaches to Short-Time Load Forecasting in Power Systems—A Comparative Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, April.
    10. Avraam Tsantekidis & Nikolaos Passalis & Anastasios Tefas & Juho Kanniainen & Moncef Gabbouj & Alexandros Iosifidis, 2018. "Using Deep Learning for price prediction by exploiting stationary limit order book features," Papers 1810.09965, arXiv.org.
    11. Shengyi Zhao & Yun Peng & Jizhan Liu & Shuo Wu, 2021. "Tomato Leaf Disease Diagnosis Based on Improved Convolution Neural Network by Attention Module," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, July.
    12. Upma Singh & Mohammad Rizwan & Muhannad Alaraj & Ibrahim Alsaidan, 2021. "A Machine Learning-Based Gradient Boosting Regression Approach for Wind Power Production Forecasting: A Step towards Smart Grid Environments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.
    13. Fei Liao & Liangli Ma & Jingjing Pei & Linshan Tan, 2019. "Combined Self-Attention Mechanism for Chinese Named Entity Recognition in Military," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-11, August.
    14. Nasir Ayub & Muhammad Irfan & Muhammad Awais & Usman Ali & Tariq Ali & Mohammed Hamdi & Abdullah Alghamdi & Fazal Muhammad, 2020. "Big Data Analytics for Short and Medium-Term Electricity Load Forecasting Using an AI Techniques Ensembler," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, October.
    15. Yih-Der Lee & Jheng-Lun Jiang & Yuan-Hsiang Ho & Wei-Chen Lin & Hsin-Ching Chih & Wei-Tzer Huang, 2020. "Neutral Current Reduction in Three-Phase Four-Wire Distribution Feeders by Optimal Phase Arrangement Based on a Full-Scale Net Load Model Derived from the FTU Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, April.
    16. Kong, Weicong & Jia, Youwei & Dong, Zhao Yang & Meng, Ke & Chai, Songjian, 2020. "Hybrid approaches based on deep whole-sky-image learning to photovoltaic generation forecasting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    17. Akash Koppa & Dominik Rains & Petra Hulsman & Rafael Poyatos & Diego G. Miralles, 2022. "A deep learning-based hybrid model of global terrestrial evaporation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    18. Bin Wang & Enhui Wang & Zikun Zhu & Yangyang Sun & Yaodong Tao & Wei Wang, 2021. "An explainable sentiment prediction model based on the portraits of users sharing representative opinions in social sensors," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 17(10), pages 15501477211, October.
    19. Sajawal ur Rehman Khan & Israa Adil Hayder & Muhammad Asif Habib & Mudassar Ahmad & Syed Muhammad Mohsin & Farrukh Aslam Khan & Kainat Mustafa, 2022. "Enhanced Machine-Learning Techniques for Medium-Term and Short-Term Electric-Load Forecasting in Smart Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    20. Park, Musik & Wang, Zhiyuan & Li, Lanyu & Wang, Xiaonan, 2023. "Multi-objective building energy system optimization considering EV infrastructure," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:8:p:2042-:d:347791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.