IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i23p6164-d450242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling of Limestone Dissolution for Flue Gas Desulfurization with Novel Implications

Author

Listed:
  • Cataldo De Blasio

    (Faculty of Science and Engineering, Energy Technology, Åbo Akademi University, 20500 Vaasa, Finland)

  • Gabriel Salierno

    (Faculty of Science and Engineering, Energy Technology, Åbo Akademi University, 20500 Vaasa, Finland
    Instituto de Tecnología de Alimentos y Procesos Químicos (ITAPROQ), CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires 1428, Argentina)

  • Donatella Sinatra

    (Faculty of Science and Engineering, Energy Technology, Åbo Akademi University, 20500 Vaasa, Finland)

  • Miryan Cassanello

    (Instituto de Tecnología de Alimentos y Procesos Químicos (ITAPROQ), CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires 1428, Argentina)

Abstract

Solid-liquid dissolution is a central step in many industrial applications such as pharmaceutical, process engineering, and pollution control. Accurate mathematical models are proposed to improve reactor design and process operations. Analytical methods are significantly beneficial in the case of iterative methods used within experimental investigations. In the present study, a detailed analytical solution for the general case of solid particles dissolving in multiphase chemical reaction systems is presented. In this model, the authors consider a formulation that considers the particles’ shape factor. The general case presented could be utilized within different problems of multiphase flows. These methods could be extended to different cases within the chemical engineering area. Examples are illustrated here in relation to limestone dissolution taking place within the Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization process, where calcium carbonate is dissolving in an acidic environment. The method is the most common used technology to abate SO 2 released by fuel combustion. Limestone dissolution plays a major role in the process. Nevertheless, there is a need for improvements in the optimization of the WFGD process for scale-up purposes. The mathematical model has been tested by comparison with experimental data from several mild acidic dissolution assays of sedimentary and metamorphic limestone. We have found that R 2 ⊂ 0.92 ± 0.06 from dozens of experiments. This fact verifies the model qualifications in capturing the main drivers of the system.

Suggested Citation

  • Cataldo De Blasio & Gabriel Salierno & Donatella Sinatra & Miryan Cassanello, 2020. "Modeling of Limestone Dissolution for Flue Gas Desulfurization with Novel Implications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:23:p:6164-:d:450242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/23/6164/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/23/6164/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blasio, Cataldo De & Mäkilä, Ermei & Westerlund, Tapio, 2012. "Use of carbonate rocks for flue gas desulfurization: Reactive dissolution of limestone particles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 175-181.
    2. Jun-Hwan Bang & Kyungsun Song & Sangwon Park & Chi Wan Jeon & Seung-Woo Lee & Wonbaek Kim, 2015. "Effects of CO 2 Bubble Size, CO 2 Flow Rate and Calcium Source on the Size and Specific Surface Area of CaCO 3 Particles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-10, October.
    3. Sina Rezaei Gomari & Farida Amrouche & Ronaldo G. Santos & Hugh Christopher Greenwell & Pablo Cubillas, 2020. "A New Framework to Quantify the Wetting Behaviour of Carbonate Rock Surfaces Based on the Relationship between Zeta Potential and Contact Angle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nejc Vovk & Jure Ravnik, 2023. "Numerical Modeling of Two-Phase Flow inside a Wet Flue Gas Absorber Sump," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-17, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Narukulla, Ramesh & Chaturvedi, Krishna Raghav & Ojha, Umaprasana & Sharma, Tushar, 2022. "Carbon dioxide capturing evaluation of polyacryloyl hydrazide solutions via rheological analysis for carbon utilization applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    2. Jun-Hwan Bang & Seung-Woo Lee & Chiwan Jeon & Sangwon Park & Kyungsun Song & Whan Joo Jo & Soochun Chae, 2016. "Leaching of Metal Ions from Blast Furnace Slag by Using Aqua Regia for CO 2 Mineralization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Chen, Long & Xu, Guiyin & Rui, Zhenhua & Alshawabkeh, Akram N., 2019. "Demonstration of a feasible energy-water-environment nexus: Waste sulfur dioxide for water treatment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 1011-1022.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:23:p:6164-:d:450242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.