IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i22p5887-d443364.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Methodology to Systematically Identify and Characterize Energy Flexibility Measures in Industrial Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Alejandro Tristán

    (Institute for Energy Efficiency in Production (EEP), University of Stuttgart, Nobelstr. 12, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
    Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation (IPA), Nobelstr. 12, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Flurina Heuberger

    (Institute for Energy Efficiency in Production (EEP), University of Stuttgart, Nobelstr. 12, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Alexander Sauer

    (Institute for Energy Efficiency in Production (EEP), University of Stuttgart, Nobelstr. 12, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
    Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation (IPA), Nobelstr. 12, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

Abstract

Industrial energy flexibility enables companies to optimize their energy-associated production costs and support the energy transition towards renewable energy sources. The first step towards achieving energy flexible operation in a production facility is to identify and characterize the energy flexibility measures available in the industrial systems that comprise it. These industrial systems are both the manufacturing systems that directly execute the production tasks and the systems performing supporting tasks or tasks necessary for the operation of these manufacturing systems. Energy flexibility measures are conscious and quantifiable actions to carry out a defined change of operative state in an industrial system. This work proposes a methodology to identify and characterize the available energy flexibility measures in industrial systems regardless of the task they perform in the facility. This methodology is the basis of energy flexibility-oriented industrial energy audits, in juxtaposition with the current industrial energy audits that focus on energy efficiency. This audit will provide industrial enterprises with a qualitative and quantitative understanding of the capabilities of their industrial systems, and hence their production facilities, for energy flexible operation. The audit results facilitate a company’s decision making towards the implementation, evaluation and management of these capabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Alejandro Tristán & Flurina Heuberger & Alexander Sauer, 2020. "A Methodology to Systematically Identify and Characterize Energy Flexibility Measures in Industrial Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-35, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:22:p:5887-:d:443364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/22/5887/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/22/5887/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yilmaz, S. & Chambers, J. & Patel, M.K., 2019. "Comparison of clustering approaches for domestic electricity load profile characterisation - Implications for demand side management," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 665-677.
    2. Paul Schott & Johannes Sedlmeir & Nina Strobel & Thomas Weber & Gilbert Fridgen & Eberhard Abele, 2019. "A Generic Data Model for Describing Flexibility in Power Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-29, May.
    3. Strbac, Goran, 2008. "Demand side management: Benefits and challenges," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 4419-4426, December.
    4. Lund, Peter D. & Lindgren, Juuso & Mikkola, Jani & Salpakari, Jyri, 2015. "Review of energy system flexibility measures to enable high levels of variable renewable electricity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 785-807.
    5. Bradley, Peter & Leach, Matthew & Torriti, Jacopo, 2013. "A review of the costs and benefits of demand response for electricity in the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 312-327.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Khan Rahmat Ullah & Marudhappan Thirugnanasambandam & Rahman Saidur & Kazi Akikur Rahman & Md. Riaz Kayser, 2021. "Analysis of Energy Use and Energy Savings: A Case Study of a Condiment Industry in India," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-25, August.
    2. Lucas Roth & Jens Lowitzsch & Özgür Yildiz, 2021. "An Empirical Study of How Household Energy Consumption Is Affected by Co-Owning Different Technological Means to Produce Renewable Energy and the Production Purpose," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-38, July.
    3. Rusche, Simon & Weissflog., Jan & Wenninger, Simon & Häckel, Björn, 2023. "How flexible are energy flexibilities? Developing a flexibility score for revenue and risk analysis in industrial demand-side management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
    4. Fatras, Nicolas & Ma, Zheng & Jørgensen, Bo Nørregaard, 2022. "Process-to-market matrix mapping: A multi-criteria evaluation framework for industrial processes’ electricity market participation feasibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    5. Mossie, Alebachew T. & Khatiwada, Dilip & Palm, Bjorn & Bekele, Getachew, 2025. "Energy demand flexibility potential in cement industries: How does it contribute to energy supply security and environmental sustainability?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PC).
    6. Pedro Faria & Zita Vale, 2023. "Demand Response in Smart Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-3, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leinauer, Christina & Schott, Paul & Fridgen, Gilbert & Keller, Robert & Ollig, Philipp & Weibelzahl, Martin, 2022. "Obstacles to demand response: Why industrial companies do not adapt their power consumption to volatile power generation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    2. Ribó-Pérez, D. & Carrión, A. & Rodríguez García, J. & Álvarez Bel, C., 2021. "Ex-post evaluation of Interruptible Load programs with a system optimisation perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    3. Nolan, Sheila & Neu, Olivier & O’Malley, Mark, 2017. "Capacity value estimation of a load-shifting resource using a coupled building and power system model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 71-82.
    4. Felten, Björn & Weber, Christoph, 2018. "The value(s) of flexible heat pumps – Assessment of technical and economic conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1292-1319.
    5. Xu, Qingyang & Sun, Feihu & Cai, Qiran & Liu, Li-Jing & Zhang, Kun & Liang, Qiao-Mei, 2022. "Assessment of the influence of demand-side responses on high-proportion renewable energy system: An evidence of Qinghai, China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 945-958.
    6. Astriani, Yuli & Shafiullah, GM & Shahnia, Farhad, 2021. "Incentive determination of a demand response program for microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    7. Paterakis, Nikolaos G. & Erdinç, Ozan & Catalão, João P.S., 2017. "An overview of Demand Response: Key-elements and international experience," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 871-891.
    8. Calver, Philippa & Simcock, Neil, 2021. "Demand response and energy justice: A critical overview of ethical risks and opportunities within digital, decentralised, and decarbonised futures," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    9. Ribó-Pérez, David & Heleno, Miguel & Álvarez-Bel, Carlos, 2021. "The flexibility gap: Socioeconomic and geographical factors driving residential flexibility," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    10. Misconel, Steffi & Zöphel, Christoph & Möst, Dominik, 2021. "Assessing the value of demand response in a decarbonized energy system – A large-scale model application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    11. Martínez Ceseña, Eduardo A. & Good, Nicholas & Mancarella, Pierluigi, 2015. "Electrical network capacity support from demand side response: Techno-economic assessment of potential business cases for small commercial and residential end-users," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 222-232.
    12. Bertsch, Valentin & Harold, Jason & Fell, Harrison, 2019. "Consumer preferences for end-use specific curtailable electricity contracts on household appliances during peak load hours," Papers WP632, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    13. Haider, Haider Tarish & See, Ong Hang & Elmenreich, Wilfried, 2016. "Residential demand response scheme based on adaptive consumption level pricing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 301-308.
    14. Ländner, Eva-Maria & Märtz, Alexandra & Schöpf, Michael & Weibelzahl, Martin, 2019. "From energy legislation to investment determination: Shaping future electricity markets with different flexibility options," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1100-1110.
    15. Jack, M.W. & Suomalainen, K. & Dew, J.J.W. & Eyers, D., 2018. "A minimal simulation of the electricity demand of a domestic hot water cylinder for smart control," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 104-112.
    16. Gils, Hans Christian, 2016. "Economic potential for future demand response in Germany – Modeling approach and case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 401-415.
    17. Roy, Anthony & Auger, François & Dupriez-Robin, Florian & Bourguet, Salvy & Tran, Quoc Tuan, 2020. "A multi-level Demand-Side Management algorithm for offgrid multi-source systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    18. Li, Xin & Chen, Hsing Hung & Tao, Xiangnan, 2016. "Pricing and capacity allocation in renewable energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1097-1105.
    19. Rövekamp, Patrick & Schöpf, Michael & Wagon, Felix & Weibelzahl, Martin, 2023. "For better or for worse? On the economic and ecologic value of industrial demand side management in constrained electricity grids," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    20. Verzijlbergh, R.A. & De Vries, L.J. & Dijkema, G.P.J. & Herder, P.M., 2017. "Institutional challenges caused by the integration of renewable energy sources in the European electricity sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 660-667.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:22:p:5887-:d:443364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.