IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i1p185-d304004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of an Offshore Wind Farm by Using Data from the Weather Station, Floating LiDAR, Mast, and MERRA

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng-Dar Yue

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, National Chiayi University, No. 300, Syuefu Rd., Chiayi 600, Taiwan)

  • Yi-Shegn Chiu

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, National Chiayi University, No. 300, Syuefu Rd., Chiayi 600, Taiwan)

  • Chien-Cheng Tu

    (Research Center for Energy Technology and Strategy, National Cheng Kung University, No.25, Xiaodong Rd., North Dist., Tainan City 704, Taiwan)

  • Ta-Hui Lin

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, No.1, University Road, Tainan City 701, Taiwan)

Abstract

Offshore wind energy is regarded as a key alternative to fossil fuels in many parts of the world. Its exploitation is based on the sound evaluation of wind resources. This study used data from a meteorological mast, a floating light detection and ranging (LiDAR) device, and the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, a reanalysis data set established by the NASA Center for Climate Simulation, to evaluate wind resources of the Changhua-South Offshore Wind Farm. The average wind speeds evaluated at a height of 105 m in the studied wind farm were 7.97 and 8.02 m/s according to the data obtained from the floating LiDAR device and a mast, respectively. The full-load hours were 3320.5 and 3296.5 h per year when data from the LiDAR device and mast were used, respectively. The estimated annual energy production (AEP) with a probability of 50% ( P 50 ) reached 314 GWh/y, whereas the AEPs with a probability of 75% ( P 75 ) and with a probability of 90% ( P 90 ) were 283 GWh/y and 255 GWh/y, respectively. The estimated AEP of P 75 was 90% of the AEP of P 50 , whereas the estimated AEP of P 90 was 81% of the AEP of P 50 . This difference might need to be considered when assessing the risk of financing a wind project.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng-Dar Yue & Yi-Shegn Chiu & Chien-Cheng Tu & Ta-Hui Lin, 2020. "Evaluation of an Offshore Wind Farm by Using Data from the Weather Station, Floating LiDAR, Mast, and MERRA," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:185-:d:304004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/1/185/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/1/185/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shakoor, Rabia & Hassan, Mohammad Yusri & Raheem, Abdur & Wu, Yuan-Kang, 2016. "Wake effect modeling: A review of wind farm layout optimization using Jensen׳s model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1048-1059.
    2. Bansal, Jagdish Chand & Farswan, Pushpa, 2017. "Wind farm layout using biogeography based optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 386-402.
    3. Ren, Guorui & Wan, Jie & Liu, Jinfu & Yu, Daren, 2019. "Characterization of wind resource in China from a new perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 994-1010.
    4. Park, Jinkyoo & Law, Kincho H., 2015. "Layout optimization for maximizing wind farm power production using sequential convex programming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 320-334.
    5. Kim, Ji-Young & Oh, Ki-Yong & Kim, Min-Suek & Kim, Kwang-Yul, 2019. "Evaluation and characterization of offshore wind resources with long-term met mast data corrected by wind lidar," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 41-55.
    6. Kwon, Soon-Duck, 2010. "Uncertainty analysis of wind energy potential assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 856-865, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luo, Zhaohui & Wang, Longyan & Xu, Jian & Wang, Zilu & Yuan, Jianping & Tan, Andy C.C., 2024. "A reduced order modeling-based machine learning approach for wind turbine wake flow estimation from sparse sensor measurements," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    2. Majidi Nezhad, Meysam & Neshat, Mehdi & Piras, Giuseppe & Astiaso Garcia, Davide, 2022. "Sites exploring prioritisation of offshore wind energy potential and mapping for wind farms installation: Iranian islands case studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    3. Majidi Nezhad, M. & Heydari, A. & Pirshayan, E. & Groppi, D. & Astiaso Garcia, D., 2021. "A novel forecasting model for wind speed assessment using sentinel family satellites images and machine learning method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 2198-2211.
    4. Yunfa Wu & Bin Zhang & Anbo Meng & Yong-Hua Liu & Chun-Yi Su, 2022. "A Hybrid Framework Combining Data-Driven and Catenary-Based Methods for Wide-Area Powerline Sag Estimation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-25, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Annas Fauzy & Cheng-Dar Yue & Chien-Cheng Tu & Ta-Hui Lin, 2021. "Understanding the Potential of Wind Farm Exploitation in Tropical Island Countries: A Case for Indonesia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-26, May.
    2. Kyoungboo Yang, 2020. "Determining an Appropriate Parameter of Analytical Wake Models for Energy Capture and Layout Optimization on Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Guirguis, David & Romero, David A. & Amon, Cristina H., 2017. "Gradient-based multidisciplinary design of wind farms with continuous-variable formulations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 279-291.
    4. Li, Qing'an & Cai, Chang & Kamada, Yasunari & Maeda, Takao & Hiromori, Yuto & Zhou, Shuni & Xu, Jianzhong, 2021. "Prediction of power generation of two 30 kW Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines with Gaussian model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    5. Sun, Haiying & Yang, Hongxing & Gao, Xiaoxia, 2019. "Investigation into spacing restriction and layout optimization of wind farm with multiple types of wind turbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 637-650.
    6. Li, Qing'an & Wang, Ye & Kamada, Yasunari & Maeda, Takao & Xu, Jianzhong & Zhou, Shuni & Zhang, Fanghong & Cai, Chang, 2022. "Diagonal inflow effect on the wake characteristics of a horizontal axis wind turbine with Gaussian model and field measurements," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    7. Gao, Xiaoxia & Yang, Hongxing & Lu, Lin, 2016. "Optimization of wind turbine layout position in a wind farm using a newly-developed two-dimensional wake model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 192-200.
    8. Moreno, Sinvaldo Rodrigues & Pierezan, Juliano & Coelho, Leandro dos Santos & Mariani, Viviana Cocco, 2021. "Multi-objective lightning search algorithm applied to wind farm layout optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    9. Kaldellis, John K. & Triantafyllou, Panagiotis & Stinis, Panagiotis, 2021. "Critical evaluation of Wind Turbines’ analytical wake models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    10. Wu, Yan & Xia, Tianqi & Wang, Yufei & Zhang, Haoran & Feng, Xiao & Song, Xuan & Shibasaki, Ryosuke, 2022. "A synchronization methodology for 3D offshore wind farm layout optimization with multi-type wind turbines and obstacle-avoiding cable network," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 302-320.
    11. Brogna, Roberto & Feng, Ju & Sørensen, Jens Nørkær & Shen, Wen Zhong & Porté-Agel, Fernando, 2020. "A new wake model and comparison of eight algorithms for layout optimization of wind farms in complex terrain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    12. Vasel-Be-Hagh, Ahmadreza & Archer, Cristina L., 2017. "Wind farm hub height optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 905-921.
    13. Liu, Weiqi & Liu, Weixing & Zhang, Liang & Sheng, Qihu & Zhou, Binzhen, 2018. "A numerical model for wind turbine wakes based on the vortex filament method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 561-570.
    14. Masoudi, Seiied Mohsen & Baneshi, Mehdi, 2022. "Layout optimization of a wind farm considering grids of various resolutions, wake effect, and realistic wind speed and wind direction data: A techno-economic assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    15. Azlan, F. & Kurnia, J.C. & Tan, B.T. & Ismadi, M.-Z., 2021. "Review on optimisation methods of wind farm array under three classical wind condition problems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    16. Yang, Xiaolei & Pakula, Maggie & Sotiropoulos, Fotis, 2018. "Large-eddy simulation of a utility-scale wind farm in complex terrain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 767-777.
    17. Kyoungboo Yang & Kyungho Cho, 2019. "Simulated Annealing Algorithm for Wind Farm Layout Optimization: A Benchmark Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-15, November.
    18. Dhoot, Aditya & Antonini, Enrico G.A. & Romero, David A. & Amon, Cristina H., 2021. "Optimizing wind farms layouts for maximum energy production using probabilistic inference: Benchmarking reveals superior computational efficiency and scalability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    19. Cao, Lichao & Ge, Mingwei & Gao, Xiaoxia & Du, Bowen & Li, Baoliang & Huang, Zhi & Liu, Yongqian, 2022. "Wind farm layout optimization to minimize the wake induced turbulence effect on wind turbines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    20. Akintayo T. Abolude & Wen Zhou, 2018. "A Comparative Computational Fluid Dynamic Study on the Effects of Terrain Type on Hub-Height Wind Aerodynamic Properties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:185-:d:304004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.