IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i18p4609-d409168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Degraded Trees from Spruce Budworm Epidemics as Bioenergy Feedstock: A Profitability Analysis of Forest Operations

Author

Listed:
  • Mathieu Béland

    (Research Centre on Renewable Materials, Department of Wood and Forest Sciences, Laval University, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada)

  • Evelyne Thiffault

    (Research Centre on Renewable Materials, Department of Wood and Forest Sciences, Laval University, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada)

  • Julie Barrette

    (Direction of Forest Research, Quebec Ministry of Forests, Wildlife and Parks, Quebec City, QC G1P 3W8, Canada)

  • Warren Mabee

    (School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada)

Abstract

Natural disturbances are common in Canadian boreal managed forests. For example, during and after insect epidemics, foresters must deal with significant amounts of degraded or dead wood that cannot be processed into sawn timber or pulp. Bioenergy could be an alternative pathway for this wood. A case study in Quebec (Canada) was used to evaluate the profitability of pellet production for bioenergy using degraded trees from insect epidemics. A bioenergy scenario was simulated in which degraded trees were harvested for bioenergy alongside sound wood for timber and pulp. This scenario was compared to a reference scenario in which degraded trees were left on cutovers. Using wood pellets as a case study, the results showed that at current market prices, harvesting degraded trees for pellet production is not as profitable as leaving them in the forest. Nevertheless, the overall forest operations for procuring wood for timber and pulp were still profitable, even with very high degradation levels. Procuring degraded trees reduced the overall fixed costs per harvested m 3 and allowed average savings of C$2.83/harvested m 3 . The silvicultural savings associated with lower site preparation needs following procurement of degraded trees ranged from C$0/ha to C$500/ha, resulting in average savings of C$2.31/harvested m 3 . Depending on the stand conditions, the distribution of fixed costs and silvicultural savings of biomass procurement could be either low or significant.

Suggested Citation

  • Mathieu Béland & Evelyne Thiffault & Julie Barrette & Warren Mabee, 2020. "Degraded Trees from Spruce Budworm Epidemics as Bioenergy Feedstock: A Profitability Analysis of Forest Operations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:18:p:4609-:d:409168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/18/4609/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/18/4609/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boukherroub, Tasseda & LeBel, Luc & Lemieux, Sébastien, 2017. "An integrated wood pellet supply chain development: Selecting among feedstock sources and a range of operating scales," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 385-400.
    2. Barrette, Julie & Thiffault, Evelyne & Achim, Alexis & Junginger, Martin & Pothier, David & De Grandpré, Louis, 2017. "A financial analysis of the potential of dead trees from the boreal forest of eastern Canada to serve as feedstock for wood pellet export," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 410-425.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dinko Vusić & Filip Vujanić & Karlo Pešić & Branimir Šafran & Vanja Jurišić & Željko Zečić, 2021. "Variability of Normative Properties of Wood Chips and Implications to Quality Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Bruno Gagnon & Heather MacDonald & Emily Hope & Margaret Jean Blair & Daniel W. McKenney, 2022. "Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Biomass Supply Chains: The Case of the Canadian Wood Pellet Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cantegril, Pierre & Paradis, Gregory & LeBel, Luc & Raulier, Frédéric, 2019. "Bioenergy production to improve value-creation potential of strategic forest management plans in mixed-wood forests of Eastern Canada," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 171-181.
    2. Visser, L. & Hoefnagels, R. & Junginger, M., 2020. "Wood pellet supply chain costs – A review and cost optimization analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    3. Nicolas Mansuy & Julie Barrette & Jérôme Laganière & Warren Mabee & David Paré & Shuva Gautam & Evelyne Thiffault & Saeed Ghafghazi, 2018. "Salvage harvesting for bioenergy in Canada: From sustainable and integrated supply chain to climate change mitigation," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(5), September.
    4. Andrzej Bochniak & Monika Stoma, 2021. "Estimating the Optimal Location for the Storage of Pellet Surplus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Vitale, Ignacio & Dondo, Rodolfo G. & González, Matías & Cóccola, Mariana E., 2022. "Modelling and optimization of material flows in the wood pellet supply chain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    6. Giulio Sperandio & Alessandro Suardi & Andrea Acampora & Vincenzo Civitarese, 2024. "Eco-Efficiency of Pellet Production from Dedicated Poplar Plantations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-23, June.
    7. Maaz Hassan & Naveed Usman & Majid Hussain & Adnan Yousaf & Muhammad Aamad Khattak & Sidra Yousaf & Rankeshwarnath Sanjay Mishr & Sana Ahmad & Fariha Rehman & Ahmad Rashedi, 2023. "Environmental and Socio-Economic Assessment of Biomass Pellets Biofuel in Hazara Division, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-23, August.
    8. Piyarath Saosee & Boonrod Sajjakulnukit & Shabbir H. Gheewala, 2020. "Life Cycle Assessment of Wood Pellet Production in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-23, August.
    9. Bruno Gagnon & Heather MacDonald & Emily Hope & Margaret Jean Blair & Daniel W. McKenney, 2022. "Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Biomass Supply Chains: The Case of the Canadian Wood Pellet Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    10. Di Letizia, Gerardo & De Lucia, Caterina & Pazienza, Pasquale & Cappelletti, Giulio Mario, 2023. "Forest bioeconomy at regional scale: A systematic literature review and future policy perspectives," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    11. De Laporte, Aaron V. & Ripplinger, David G., 2019. "The effects of site selection, opportunity costs and transportation costs on bioethanol production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 73-82.
    12. Ahn, Yuchan & Han, Jeehoon, 2018. "Economic optimization of integrated network for utility supply and carbon dioxide mitigation with multi-site and multi-period demand uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 723-734.
    13. Lenka Štofová & Petra Szaryszová & Bohuslava Mihalčová, 2021. "Testing the Bioeconomic Options of Transitioning to Solid Recovered Fuel: A Case Study of a Thermal Power Plant in Slovakia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    14. Mahmood Ebadian & Shahab Sokhansanj & David Lee & Alyssa Klein & Lawrence Townley-Smith, 2021. "Evaluating the Economic Viability of Agricultural Pellets to Supplement the Current Global Wood Pellets Supply for Bioenergy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Santos, Andreia & Carvalho, Ana & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana Paula & Marques, Alexandra & Amorim, Pedro, 2019. "Assessment and optimization of sustainable forest wood supply chains – A systematic literature review," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 112-135.
    16. Esther S. Parish & Latha M. Baskaran & Virginia H. Dale, 2021. "Framework for assessing land‐management effects on at‐risk species: Example of SE USA wood pellet production and gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus)," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(1), January.
    17. Zaher Abusaq & Muhammad Salman Habib & Adeel Shehzad & Mohammad Kanan & Ramiz Assaf, 2022. "A Flexible Robust Possibilistic Programming Approach toward Wood Pellets Supply Chain Network Design," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-27, October.
    18. Éloïse Dupuis & Evelyne Thiffault & Julie Barrette & Kokou Adjallé & Christine Martineau, 2020. "Bioenergy Conversion Potential of Decaying Hardwoods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-21, December.
    19. Soares, Ricardo & Marques, Alexandra & Amorim, Pedro & Rasinmäki, Jussi, 2019. "Multiple vehicle synchronisation in a full truck-load pickup and delivery problem: A case-study in the biomass supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(1), pages 174-194.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:18:p:4609-:d:409168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.