IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i17p4411-d404553.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Numerical Study on the Working Performance of a Streamlined Annular Jet Pump

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaodong Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Yunliang Chen

    (State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Mengqiu Li

    (State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Yong Xu

    (State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Bo Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Xiaoqiang Dang

    (State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

Abstract

To improve the working performance of the early annular jet pump (EAJP), a streamlined annular jet pump (SAJP) was proposed. The flow field and working performance of the EAJP and SAJP with an area ratio ( m ) of 1.75 were numerically studied and compared, separately, by using the combination of the Realizable k - ε turbulence model and the Schnerr–Sauer cavitation model. The results show that the efficiency of the SAJP is higher than that of the EAJP, when the flow ratio ( q ) is higher than 0.30, with a maximum increase of 1.2%. Furthermore, the high-efficiency area of the SAJP ( q = 0.40~0.69) is wider than that of the EAJP ( q = 0.36~0.57). There is no flow separation and low local pressure in the SAJP, due to the conjunction part of the suction chamber, throat, diffuser and outlet pipe without the structural mutation. It was found that the incipient cavitation number ( σ i ) of the SAJP and EAJP was 0.541 and 0.578, respectively; therefore, the cavitation performance of the SAJP is better. Meanwhile, the critical flow ratio ( q c ) of the SAJP is 0.69, which is larger than that of the EAJP ( q c = 0.57), implying that the SAJP has a wider normal working range than the EAJP. Importantly, the inception and development of cavitation appeared in the diffuser of the SAJP, different from that in the throat of the EAJP. Hence, it concluded that the cavitation in the SAJP has less influence on the flow field and working performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaodong Wang & Yunliang Chen & Mengqiu Li & Yong Xu & Bo Wang & Xiaoqiang Dang, 2020. "Numerical Study on the Working Performance of a Streamlined Annular Jet Pump," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:17:p:4411-:d:404553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/17/4411/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/17/4411/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jing Dong & Zhongdong Qian & Biraj Singh Thapa & Bhola Thapa & Zhiwei Guo, 2019. "Alternative Design of Double-Suction Centrifugal Pump to Reduce the Effects of Silt Erosion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jian Li & Xing Zhou & Hongbo Zhao & Chengqi Mou & Long Meng & Liping Sun & Peijian Zhou, 2024. "Bionic Strategies for Pump Anti-Cavitation: A Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-25, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:17:p:4411-:d:404553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.