IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i23p4476-d290433.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geothermal Power Production from Abandoned Oil Reservoirs Using In Situ Combustion Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Yuhao Zhu

    (School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Kewen Li

    (School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
    Key Laboratory of Strategy Evaluation for Shale Gas, Ministry of Land and Resources, Beijing 100083, China
    Department of Energy Resources Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA)

  • Changwei Liu

    (School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Mahlalela Bhekumuzi Mgijimi

    (School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

Development of geothermal resources on abandoned oil reservoirs is considered environmentally friendly. This method could reduce the rate of energy consumption from oil fields. In this study, the feasibility of geothermal energy recovery based on a deep borehole heat exchanger modified from abandoned oil reservoirs using in situ combustion technology is investigated. This system could produce a large amount of heat compensated by in situ combustion in oil reservoir without directly contacting the formation fluid and affecting the oil production. A coupling strategy between the heat exchange system and the oil reservoir was developed to help avoid the high computational cost while ensuring computational accuracy. Several computational scenarios were performed, and results were obtained and analyzed. The computational results showed that an optimal water injection velocity of 0.06 m/s provides a highest outlet temperature of (165.8 °C) and the greatest power output of (164.6 kW) for a single well in all the performed scenarios. Based on the findings of this study, a geothermal energy production system associated with in situ combustion is proposed, specifically for economic reasons, because it can rapidly shorten the payback period of the upfront costs. Modeling was also performed, and based on the modeling data, the proposed technology has a very short payback period of about 4.5 years and a final cumulative net cash flow of about $4.94 million. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that utilizing geothermal resources or thermal energy in oilfields by adopting in situ combustion technology for enhanced oil recovery is of great significance and has great economic benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuhao Zhu & Kewen Li & Changwei Liu & Mahlalela Bhekumuzi Mgijimi, 2019. "Geothermal Power Production from Abandoned Oil Reservoirs Using In Situ Combustion Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:23:p:4476-:d:290433
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/23/4476/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/23/4476/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kujawa, Tomasz & Nowak, Władysław & Stachel, Aleksander A., 2006. "Utilization of existing deep geological wells for acquisitions of geothermal energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 650-664.
    2. Lorenzo Tocci & Tamas Pal & Ioannis Pesmazoglou & Benjamin Franchetti, 2017. "Small Scale Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC): A Techno-Economic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-26, March.
    3. Cheng, Wen-Long & Liu, Jian & Nian, Yong-Le & Wang, Chang-Long, 2016. "Enhancing geothermal power generation from abandoned oil wells with thermal reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 537-545.
    4. Self, Stuart J. & Reddy, Bale V. & Rosen, Marc A., 2013. "Geothermal heat pump systems: Status review and comparison with other heating options," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 341-348.
    5. Davis, Adelina P. & Michaelides, Efstathios E., 2009. "Geothermal power production from abandoned oil wells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(7), pages 866-872.
    6. Templeton, J.D. & Ghoreishi-Madiseh, S.A. & Hassani, F. & Al-Khawaja, M.J., 2014. "Abandoned petroleum wells as sustainable sources of geothermal energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 366-373.
    7. Bu, Xianbiao & Ma, Weibin & Li, Huashan, 2012. "Geothermal energy production utilizing abandoned oil and gas wells," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 80-85.
    8. Barbier, Enrico, 2002. "Geothermal energy technology and current status: an overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 6(1-2), pages 3-65.
    9. Zhang, Yan-Jun & Li, Zheng-Wei & Guo, Liang-Liang & Gao, Ping & Jin, Xian-Peng & Xu, Tian-Fu, 2014. "Electricity generation from enhanced geothermal systems by oilfield produced water circulating through reservoir stimulated by staged fracturing technology for horizontal wells: A case study in Xujiaw," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 788-805.
    10. Mokhtari, Hamid & Hadiannasab, Hasti & Mostafavi, Mostafa & Ahmadibeni, Ali & Shahriari, Behrooz, 2016. "Determination of optimum geothermal Rankine cycle parameters utilizing coaxial heat exchanger," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 260-275.
    11. Cheng, Wen-Long & Li, Tong-Tong & Nian, Yong-Le & Xie, Kun, 2014. "Evaluation of working fluids for geothermal power generation from abandoned oil wells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 238-245.
    12. Nian, Yong-Le & Cheng, Wen-Long, 2018. "Insights into geothermal utilization of abandoned oil and gas wells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 44-60.
    13. Østergaard, Poul Alberg & Lund, Henrik, 2011. "A renewable energy system in Frederikshavn using low-temperature geothermal energy for district heating," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 479-487, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aydin, Hakki & Merey, Sukru, 2021. "Potential of geothermal energy production from depleted gas fields: A case study of Dodan Field, Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1076-1088.
    2. Duggal, R. & Rayudu, R. & Hinkley, J. & Burnell, J. & Wieland, C. & Keim, M., 2022. "A comprehensive review of energy extraction from low-temperature geothermal resources in hydrocarbon fields," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    3. Juan D. Antolinez & Rahman Miri & Alireza Nouri, 2023. "In Situ Combustion: A Comprehensive Review of the Current State of Knowledge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-27, August.
    4. Hu, Xincheng & Banks, Jonathan & Guo, Yunting & Liu, Wei Victor, 2021. "Retrofitting abandoned petroleum wells as doublet deep borehole heat exchangers for geothermal energy production—a numerical investigation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 115-134.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nian, Yong-Le & Cheng, Wen-Long, 2018. "Insights into geothermal utilization of abandoned oil and gas wells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 44-60.
    2. Nian, Yong-Le & Cheng, Wen-Long, 2018. "Evaluation of geothermal heating from abandoned oil wells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 592-607.
    3. Tang, Hewei & Xu, Boyue & Hasan, A. Rashid & Sun, Zhuang & Killough, John, 2019. "Modeling wellbore heat exchangers: Fully numerical to fully analytical solutions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1124-1135.
    4. Bu, Xianbiao & Ran, Yunmin & Zhang, Dongdong, 2019. "Experimental and simulation studies of geothermal single well for building heating," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1902-1909.
    5. Kurnia, Jundika C. & Putra, Zulfan A. & Muraza, Oki & Ghoreishi-Madiseh, Seyed Ali & Sasmito, Agus P., 2021. "Numerical evaluation, process design and techno-economic analysis of geothermal energy extraction from abandoned oil wells in Malaysia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 868-879.
    6. Sun, Fengrui & Yao, Yuedong & Li, Guozhen & Li, Xiangfang, 2018. "Geothermal energy extraction in CO2 rich basin using abandoned horizontal wells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 760-773.
    7. Xie, Kun & Nian, Yong-Le & Cheng, Wen-Long, 2018. "Analysis and optimization of underground thermal energy storage using depleted oil wells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1006-1016.
    8. Alimonti, C. & Soldo, E. & Bocchetti, D. & Berardi, D., 2018. "The wellbore heat exchangers: A technical review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 353-381.
    9. Cheng, Sharon W.Y. & Kurnia, Jundika C. & Ghoreishi-Madiseh, Seyed Ali & Sasmito, Agus P., 2019. "Optimization of geothermal energy extraction from abandoned oil well with a novel well bottom curvature design utilizing Taguchi method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    10. Anna Chmielowska & Anna Sowiżdżał & Barbara Tomaszewska, 2021. "Prospects of Using Hydrocarbon Deposits from the Autochthonous Miocene Formation (Eastern Carpathian Foredeep, Poland) for Geothermal Purposes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-28, May.
    11. Hu, Xincheng & Banks, Jonathan & Wu, Linping & Liu, Wei Victor, 2020. "Numerical modeling of a coaxial borehole heat exchanger to exploit geothermal energy from abandoned petroleum wells in Hinton, Alberta," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1110-1123.
    12. C, Alimonti & P, Conti & E, Soldo, 2019. "A comprehensive exergy evaluation of a deep borehole heat exchanger coupled with a ORC plant: the case study of Campi Flegrei," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    13. Jia, G.S. & Ma, Z.D. & Xia, Z.H. & Zhang, Y.P. & Xue, Y.Z. & Chai, J.C. & Jin, L.W., 2022. "A finite-volume method for full-scale simulations of coaxial borehole heat exchangers with different structural parameters, geological and operating conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 296-313.
    14. Kędzierski, Piotr & Nagórski, Zdzisław & Niezgoda, Tadeusz, 2016. "Determination of local values of heat transfer coefficient in geothermal models with internal functions method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 506-516.
    15. Alimonti, C. & Soldo, E., 2016. "Study of geothermal power generation from a very deep oil well with a wellbore heat exchanger," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 292-301.
    16. Yang, Yi & Huo, Yaowu & Xia, Wenkai & Wang, Xurong & Zhao, Pan & Dai, Yiping, 2017. "Construction and preliminary test of a geothermal ORC system using geothermal resource from abandoned oil wells in the Huabei oilfield of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 633-645.
    17. Asif Mehmood & Jun Yao & Dongyan Fan & Kelvin Bongole & Junrong Liu & Xu Zhang, 2019. "Potential for heat production by retrofitting abandoned gas wells into geothermal wells," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, August.
    18. Cheng, Wen-Long & Liu, Jian & Nian, Yong-Le & Wang, Chang-Long, 2016. "Enhancing geothermal power generation from abandoned oil wells with thermal reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 537-545.
    19. Hu, Xincheng & Banks, Jonathan & Guo, Yunting & Liu, Wei Victor, 2021. "Retrofitting abandoned petroleum wells as doublet deep borehole heat exchangers for geothermal energy production—a numerical investigation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 115-134.
    20. Li, Chao & Jiang, Chao & Guan, Yanling & Chen, Hao & Yang, Ruitao & Wan, Rong & Shen, Lu, 2023. "Comparison of the experimental and numerical results of coaxial-type and U-type deep-buried pipes’ heat transfer performances," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 95-106.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:23:p:4476-:d:290433. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.