IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i19p3641-d270193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generalized Extreme Value Statistics, Physical Scaling and Forecasts of Oil Production in the Bakken Shale

Author

Listed:
  • Wardana Saputra

    (The Ali I. Al-Naimi Petroleum Engineering Research Center, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia)

  • Wissem Kirati

    (The Ali I. Al-Naimi Petroleum Engineering Research Center, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia)

  • Tadeusz Patzek

    (The Ali I. Al-Naimi Petroleum Engineering Research Center, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

We aim to replace the current industry-standard empirical forecasts of oil production from hydrofractured horizontal wells in shales with a statistically and physically robust, accurate and precise method of matching historic well performance and predicting well production for up to two more decades. Our Bakken oil forecasting method extends the previous work on predicting fieldwide gas production in the Barnett shale and merges it with our new scaling of oil production in the Bakken. We first divide the existing 14,678 horizontal oil wells in the Bakken into 12 static samples in which reservoir quality and completion technologies are similar. For each sample, we use a purely data-driven non-parametric approach to arrive at an appropriate generalized extreme value (GEV) distribution of oil production from that sample’s dynamic well cohorts with at least 1 , 2 , 3 , ⋯ years on production. From these well cohorts, we stitch together the P 50 , P 10 , and P 90 statistical well prototypes for each sample. These statistical well prototypes are conditioned by well attrition, hydrofracture deterioration, pressure interference, well interference, progress in technology, and so forth. So far, there has been no physical scaling. Now we fit the parameters of our physical scaling model to the statistical well prototypes, and obtain a smooth extrapolation of oil production that is mechanistic, and not just a decline curve. At late times, we add radial inflow from the outside. By calculating the number of potential wells per square mile of each Bakken region (core and noncore), and scheduling future drilling programs, we stack up the extended well prototypes to obtain the plausible forecasts of oil production in the Bakken. We predict that Bakken will ultimately produce 5 billion barrels of oil from the existing wells, with the possible addition of 2 and 6 billion barrels from core and noncore areas, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Wardana Saputra & Wissem Kirati & Tadeusz Patzek, 2019. "Generalized Extreme Value Statistics, Physical Scaling and Forecasts of Oil Production in the Bakken Shale," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-24, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:19:p:3641-:d:270193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/19/3641/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/19/3641/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruud Weijermars & Arnaud Van Harmelen, 2018. "Shale Reservoir Drainage Visualized for a Wolfcamp Well (Midland Basin, West Texas, USA)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-21, June.
    2. J. David Hughes, 2013. "A reality check on the shale revolution," Nature, Nature, vol. 494(7437), pages 307-308, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wardana Saputra & Wissem Kirati & Tadeusz Patzek, 2021. "Forecast of Economic Tight Oil and Gas Production in Permian Basin," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Tadeusz W. Patzek & Ahmed M. Saad & Ahmed Hassan, 2022. "Multimodal Carbonates: Distribution of Oil Saturation in the Microporous Regions of Arab Formations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Wardana Saputra & Wissem Kirati & Tadeusz Patzek, 2020. "Physical Scaling of Oil Production Rates and Ultimate Recovery from All Horizontal Wells in the Bakken Shale," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-29, April.
    4. Daniela A. Arias Ortiz & Lukasz Klimkowski & Thomas Finkbeiner & Tadeusz W. Patzek, 2021. "The Effect of Hydraulic Fracture Geometry on Well Productivity in Shale Oil Plays with High Pore Pressure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Syed Haider & Wardana Saputra & Tadeusz Patzek, 2020. "The Key Factors That Determine the Economically Viable, Horizontal Hydrofractured Gas Wells in Mudrocks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, May.
    6. Timofey Eltsov & Maxim Yutkin & Tadeusz W. Patzek, 2020. "Text Analysis Reveals Major Trends in Exploration Geophysics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-15, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jie Zhang & Xizhe Li & Weijun Shen & Shusheng Gao & Huaxun Liu & Liyou Ye & Feifei Fang, 2020. "Study of the Effect of Movable Water Saturation on Gas Production in Tight Sandstone Gas Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Xue-Ting Jiang & Rongrong Li, 2017. "Decoupling and Decomposition Analysis of Carbon Emissions from Electric Output in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-13, May.
    3. Wang, Qiang & Li, Rongrong, 2016. "Natural gas from shale formation: A research profile," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1-6.
    4. Wang, Lian & Yao, Yuedong & Wang, Kongjie & Adenutsi, Caspar Daniel & Zhao, Guoxiang & Lai, Fengpeng, 2022. "Hybrid application of unsupervised and supervised learning in forecasting absolute open flow potential for shale gas reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    5. Oke, Doris & Mukherjee, Rajib & Sengupta, Debalina & Majozi, Thokozani & El-Halwagi, Mahmoud, 2020. "On the optimization of water-energy nexus in shale gas network under price uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    6. Jacobson, Mark Z. & Howarth, Robert W. & Delucchi, Mark A. & Scobie, Stan R. & Barth, Jannette M. & Dvorak, Michael J. & Klevze, Megan & Katkhuda, Hind & Miranda, Brian & Chowdhury, Navid A. & Jones, , 2013. "Response to comment on paper examining the feasibility of changing New York state's energy infrastructure to one derived from wind, water, and sunlight," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1212-1215.
    7. Weiyao Zhu & Guodong Zou & Yuwei Liu & Wenchao Liu & Bin Pan, 2022. "The Influence of Movable Water on the Gas-Phase Threshold Pressure Gradient in Tight Gas Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-12, July.
    8. Wang, Qiang & Li, Rongrong, 2017. "Research status of shale gas: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 715-720.
    9. Temitope Love Baiyegunhi & Christopher Baiyegunhi & Benedict Kinshasa Pharoe, 2022. "Global Research Trends on Shale Gas from 2010–2020 Using a Bibliometric Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, March.
    10. Huang, Xianfu & Zhao, Ya-Pu, 2023. "Evolution of pore structure and adsorption-desorption in oil shale formation rocks after compression," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    11. Guanglin Pi & Xiucheng Dong & Cong Dong & Jie Guo & Zhengwei Ma, 2015. "The Status, Obstacles and Policy Recommendations of Shale Gas Development in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-20, February.
    12. Philipp M. Richter, 2015. "From Boom to Bust? A Critical Look at US Shale Gas Projections," Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    13. Aramendia, Emmanuel & Heun, Matthew K. & Brockway, Paul E. & Taylor, Peter G., 2022. "Developing a Multi-Regional Physical Supply Use Table framework to improve the accuracy and reliability of energy analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    14. Knudsen, Brage Rugstad & Whitson, Curtis H. & Foss, Bjarne, 2014. "Shale-gas scheduling for natural-gas supply in electric power production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 165-182.
    15. Wang, Tianyu & Tian, Shouceng & Li, Gensheng & Zhang, Liyuan & Sheng, Mao & Ren, Wenxi, 2021. "Molecular simulation of gas adsorption in shale nanopores: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    16. Middleton, Richard S. & Gupta, Rajan & Hyman, Jeffrey D. & Viswanathan, Hari S., 2017. "The shale gas revolution: Barriers, sustainability, and emerging opportunities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 88-95.
    17. Ruud Weijermars & Aadi Khanal, 2019. "Elementary Pore Network Models Based on Complex Analysis Methods (CAM): Fundamental Insights for Shale Field Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-39, April.
    18. Eife, Thomas, 2020. "The General Equilibrium Effects of the Shale Revolution," Working Papers 0694, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
    19. Sheridan Few & Ajay Gambhir & Tamaryn Napp & Adam Hawkes & Stephane Mangeon & Dan Bernie & Jason Lowe, 2017. "The Impact of Shale Gas on the Cost and Feasibility of Meeting Climate Targets—A Global Energy System Model Analysis and an Exploration of Uncertainties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, January.
    20. Rongrong Li & Min Su, 2017. "The Role of Natural Gas and Renewable Energy in Curbing Carbon Emission: Case Study of the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-18, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:19:p:3641-:d:270193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.