IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i14p5309-d868571.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Movable Water on the Gas-Phase Threshold Pressure Gradient in Tight Gas Reservoirs

Author

Listed:
  • Weiyao Zhu

    (School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Guodong Zou

    (School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yuwei Liu

    (School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Wenchao Liu

    (School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Bin Pan

    (School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

Threshold pressure gradient (TPG) is a key parameter determining the pore-scale fluid dynamics. In tight gas reservoirs, both gas and water exist in the porous rock, and the existing water can be divided into irreducible and movable water. However, how movable water saturation will influence TPG has not yet been investigated. Therefore herein, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and high-pressure mercury intrusion (HPMI) experiments were performed to determine pore-scale water distribution, movable water saturation, and pore throat distribution in the core plugs. Subsequently, the air bubble method was used to measure TPG as a function of movable water saturation and permeability inside tight gas core plugs, finding that TPG increased from 0.01 MPa/m to 0.25 MPa/m with the movable saturation increased from 2% to 35%. Finally, a semi-empirical model was derived to describe the correlation between TPG, movable water saturation, and permeability, which performed better than previous models in the literature. These insights will advance the fundamental understanding of TPG in tight gas reservoirs and provide useful guidance on tight gas reservoirs development.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiyao Zhu & Guodong Zou & Yuwei Liu & Wenchao Liu & Bin Pan, 2022. "The Influence of Movable Water on the Gas-Phase Threshold Pressure Gradient in Tight Gas Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-12, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:14:p:5309-:d:868571
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/14/5309/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/14/5309/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yong Wang & Yunqian Long & Yeheng Sun & Shiming Zhang & Fuquan Song & Xiaohong Wang, 2019. "Threshold Pore Pressure Gradients in Water-Bearing Tight Sandstone Gas Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-13, December.
    2. J. David Hughes, 2013. "A reality check on the shale revolution," Nature, Nature, vol. 494(7437), pages 307-308, February.
    3. Jie Zhang & Xizhe Li & Weijun Shen & Shusheng Gao & Huaxun Liu & Liyou Ye & Feifei Fang, 2020. "Study of the Effect of Movable Water Saturation on Gas Production in Tight Sandstone Gas Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-14, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuping Sun & Qiaojing Li & Cheng Chang & Xuewu Wang & Xuefeng Yang, 2022. "NMR-Based Shale Core Imbibition Performance Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-10, August.
    2. Tongjing Liu & Liwu Jiang & Jinju Liu & Juan Ni & Xinju Liu & Pengxiang Diwu, 2022. "A Novel Workflow for Early Time Transient Pressure Data Interpretation in Tight Oil Reservoirs with Physical Constraints," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jie Zhang & Xizhe Li & Weijun Shen & Shusheng Gao & Huaxun Liu & Liyou Ye & Feifei Fang, 2020. "Study of the Effect of Movable Water Saturation on Gas Production in Tight Sandstone Gas Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Xue-Ting Jiang & Rongrong Li, 2017. "Decoupling and Decomposition Analysis of Carbon Emissions from Electric Output in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-13, May.
    3. Wang, Qiang & Li, Rongrong, 2016. "Natural gas from shale formation: A research profile," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1-6.
    4. Wang, Lian & Yao, Yuedong & Wang, Kongjie & Adenutsi, Caspar Daniel & Zhao, Guoxiang & Lai, Fengpeng, 2022. "Hybrid application of unsupervised and supervised learning in forecasting absolute open flow potential for shale gas reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    5. Oke, Doris & Mukherjee, Rajib & Sengupta, Debalina & Majozi, Thokozani & El-Halwagi, Mahmoud, 2020. "On the optimization of water-energy nexus in shale gas network under price uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    6. Jacobson, Mark Z. & Howarth, Robert W. & Delucchi, Mark A. & Scobie, Stan R. & Barth, Jannette M. & Dvorak, Michael J. & Klevze, Megan & Katkhuda, Hind & Miranda, Brian & Chowdhury, Navid A. & Jones, , 2013. "Response to comment on paper examining the feasibility of changing New York state's energy infrastructure to one derived from wind, water, and sunlight," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1212-1215.
    7. Wang, Qiang & Li, Rongrong, 2017. "Research status of shale gas: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 715-720.
    8. Temitope Love Baiyegunhi & Christopher Baiyegunhi & Benedict Kinshasa Pharoe, 2022. "Global Research Trends on Shale Gas from 2010–2020 Using a Bibliometric Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Huang, Xianfu & Zhao, Ya-Pu, 2023. "Evolution of pore structure and adsorption-desorption in oil shale formation rocks after compression," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    10. Guanglin Pi & Xiucheng Dong & Cong Dong & Jie Guo & Zhengwei Ma, 2015. "The Status, Obstacles and Policy Recommendations of Shale Gas Development in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-20, February.
    11. Philipp M. Richter, 2015. "From Boom to Bust? A Critical Look at US Shale Gas Projections," Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    12. Aramendia, Emmanuel & Heun, Matthew K. & Brockway, Paul E. & Taylor, Peter G., 2022. "Developing a Multi-Regional Physical Supply Use Table framework to improve the accuracy and reliability of energy analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    13. Knudsen, Brage Rugstad & Whitson, Curtis H. & Foss, Bjarne, 2014. "Shale-gas scheduling for natural-gas supply in electric power production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 165-182.
    14. Wang, Tianyu & Tian, Shouceng & Li, Gensheng & Zhang, Liyuan & Sheng, Mao & Ren, Wenxi, 2021. "Molecular simulation of gas adsorption in shale nanopores: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    15. Middleton, Richard S. & Gupta, Rajan & Hyman, Jeffrey D. & Viswanathan, Hari S., 2017. "The shale gas revolution: Barriers, sustainability, and emerging opportunities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 88-95.
    16. Eife, Thomas, 2020. "The General Equilibrium Effects of the Shale Revolution," Working Papers 0694, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
    17. Sheridan Few & Ajay Gambhir & Tamaryn Napp & Adam Hawkes & Stephane Mangeon & Dan Bernie & Jason Lowe, 2017. "The Impact of Shale Gas on the Cost and Feasibility of Meeting Climate Targets—A Global Energy System Model Analysis and an Exploration of Uncertainties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, January.
    18. Rongrong Li & Min Su, 2017. "The Role of Natural Gas and Renewable Energy in Curbing Carbon Emission: Case Study of the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-18, April.
    19. Chi Kong Chyong and David M. Reiner, 2015. "Economics and Politics of Shale Gas in Europe," Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    20. Zhan, Honglei & Wang, Yan & Chen, Mengxi & Chen, Ru & Zhao, Kun & Yue, Wenzheng, 2020. "An optical mechanism for detecting the whole pyrolysis process of oil shale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:14:p:5309-:d:868571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.