IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i11p2167-d237677.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling Phase Shifters in Power System Simulations Based on Reduced Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Nuno Marinho

    (EDF R&D, 7 bd Gaspard Monge, F-91120 Palaiseau, France
    GeePs|Group of Electrical Engineering-Paris, 3, 11 Rue Joliot Curie, Plateau de Moulon, F-91192 Gif-sur-Yvette CEDEX, France)

  • Yannick Phulpin

    (EDF R&D, 7 bd Gaspard Monge, F-91120 Palaiseau, France)

  • Adrien Atayi

    (EDF R&D, 7 bd Gaspard Monge, F-91120 Palaiseau, France)

  • Martin Hennebel

    (GeePs|Group of Electrical Engineering-Paris, 3, 11 Rue Joliot Curie, Plateau de Moulon, F-91192 Gif-sur-Yvette CEDEX, France)

Abstract

Phase shifters are becoming widespread assets operated by transmission system operators to deal with congestions and contingencies using non-costly remedial actions. The setting of these controllable devices, which impacts power flows over large areas, may vary significantly according to the operational conditions. It is thus a key challenge to model phase shifters appropriately in power system simulation. In particular, accounting for the flexibility of phase shifters in reduced network models is a vibrant issue, as system stakeholders rely more and more on reduced models to perform studies supporting operational and investment decisions. Different approaches in the literature are proposed to model phase shifters in reduced network. Nevertheless, these approaches are based on the electrical parameters of the system which are not suitable for reduced network models. To address this problem, our paper proposes a methodology and assesses the impact of this contribution in terms of accuracy of the modelling on reduced network models. The approach was applied to a realistic case-study of the European transmission network that was clustered into a reduced network consisting of 54 buses and 82 branches. The reduction was performed using classical clustering methods and represented using a static power transfer distribution factor matrix. The simulations highlight that including an explicit phase shifter transformers representation in reduced models is of interest, when comparing with the representation using only a static power transfer distribution factor matrix.

Suggested Citation

  • Nuno Marinho & Yannick Phulpin & Adrien Atayi & Martin Hennebel, 2019. "Modeling Phase Shifters in Power System Simulations Based on Reduced Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:11:p:2167-:d:237677
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/11/2167/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/11/2167/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Burstedde, Barbara, 2012. "From Nodal to Zonal Pricing - A Bottom-Up Approach to the Second-Best," EWI Working Papers 2012-9, Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emanuele Ciapessoni & Diego Cirio & Francesco Conte & Andrea Pitto & Stefano Massucco & Matteo Saviozzi, 2023. "Probabilistic Security-Constrained Preventive Control under Forecast Uncertainties Including Volt/Var Constraints," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-26, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karsten Neuhoff & Sophia Rüster & Sebastian Schwenen, 2015. "Power Market Design beyond 2020: Time to Revisit Key Elements?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1456, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    2. Katrin Trepper & Michael Bucksteeg & Christoph Weber, 2013. "An integrated approach to model redispatch and to assess potential benefits from market splitting in Germany," EWL Working Papers 1319, University of Duisburg-Essen, Chair for Management Science and Energy Economics, revised Apr 2014.
    3. Jan Málek & Lukáš Recka & Karel Janda, 2017. "Impact of German Energiewende on transmission lines in the Central European region," CAMA Working Papers 2017-72, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    4. Grzegorz Orynczak & Marcin Jakubek & Karol Wawrzyniak & Michal Klos, 2014. "Market Coupling as the Universal Algorithm to Assess Zonal Divisions," Papers 1405.0878, arXiv.org.
    5. Jonas Egerer & Jens Weibezahn & Hauke Hermann, 2015. "Two Price Zones for the German Electricity Market: Market Implications and Distributional Effects," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1451, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    6. Heffron, Raphael J. & Körner, Marc-Fabian & Sumarno, Theresia & Wagner, Jonathan & Weibelzahl, Martin & Fridgen, Gilbert, 2022. "How different electricity pricing systems affect the energy trilemma: Assessing Indonesia's electricity market transition," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    7. Cristian Bovo & Valentin Ilea & Enrico Maria Carlini & Mauro Caprabianca & Federico Quaglia & Luca Luzi & Giuseppina Nuzzo, 2021. "Optimal Computation of Network Indicators for Electricity Market Bidding Zones Configuration Considering Explicit N-1 Security Constraints," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-31, July.
    8. Obermüller, Frank, 2017. "Build Wind Capacities at Windy Locations? Assessment of System Optimal Wind Locations," EWI Working Papers 2017-9, Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI).
    9. Fridgen, Gilbert & Michaelis, Anne & Rinck, Maximilian & Schöpf, Michael & Weibelzahl, Martin, 2020. "The search for the perfect match: Aligning power-trading products to the energy transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    10. Marco Sebastian Breder & Felix Meurer & Michael Bucksteeg & Christoph Weber, 2022. "Spatial Incentives for Power-to-hydrogen through Market Splitting," EWL Working Papers 2203, University of Duisburg-Essen, Chair for Management Science and Energy Economics, revised Jul 2022.
    11. Ambrosius, Mirjam & Grimm, Veronika & Kleinert, Thomas & Liers, Frauke & Schmidt, Martin & Zöttl, Gregor, 2020. "Endogenous price zones and investment incentives in electricity markets: An application of multilevel optimization with graph partitioning," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    12. Tim Felling & Christoph Weber, 2017. "Consistent and robust delimitation of price zones under uncertainty with an application to Central Western Europe," EWL Working Papers 1706, University of Duisburg-Essen, Chair for Management Science and Energy Economics, revised Jun 2017.
    13. Egerer, Jonas & Weibezahn, Jens & Hermann, Hauke, 2016. "Two price zones for the German electricity market — Market implications and distributional effects," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 365-381.
    14. Bjørndal, Endre & Bjørndal, Mette & Gribkovskaia, Victoria, 2014. "A Nodal Pricing Model for the Nordic Electricity Market," Discussion Papers 2014/43, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    15. Karsten Neuhoff, Sophia Wolter and Sebastian Schwenen, 2016. "Power markets with Renewables: New perspectives for the European Target Model," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Bollino-M).
    16. Felling, Tim, 2021. "Development of a genetic algorithm and its application to a bi-level problem of system cost optimal electricity price zone configurations," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    17. Syranidis, Konstantinos & Robinius, Martin & Stolten, Detlef, 2018. "Control techniques and the modeling of electrical power flow across transmission networks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3452-3467.
    18. Karel Janda & Jan Malek & Lukas Recka, 2017. "The Influence of Renewable Energy Sources on the Czech Electricity Transmission System," Working Papers IES 2017/06, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, revised Mar 2017.
    19. Arne Pöstges & Christoph Weber, "undated". "Identifying key elements for adequate simplifications of investment choices - The case of wind energy expansion," EWL Working Papers 2101, University of Duisburg-Essen, Chair for Management Science and Energy Economics.
    20. Felling, Tim & Weber, Christoph, 2018. "Consistent and robust delimitation of price zones under uncertainty with an application to Central Western Europe," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 583-601.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:11:p:2167-:d:237677. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.