IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i6p1441-d150513.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

3D Numerical Study of Multiphase Counter-Current Flow within a Packed Bed for Post Combustion Carbon Dioxide Capture

Author

Listed:
  • Li Yang

    (Key Laboratory of Coal-Based CO 2 Capture and Geological Storage, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China
    School of Electrical and Power Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China)

  • Fang Liu

    (School of Electrical and Power Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China)

  • Zhengchang Song

    (School of Electrical and Power Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China)

  • Kunlei Liu

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA)

  • Kozo Saito

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA)

Abstract

The hydrodynamics within counter-current flow packed beds is of vital importance to provide insight into the design and operational parameters that may impact reactor and reaction efficiencies in processes used for post combustion CO 2 capture. However, the multiphase counter-current flows in random packing used in these processes are complicated to visualize. Hence, this work aimed at developing a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model to study more precisely the complex details of flow inside a packed bed. The simulation results clearly demonstrated the development of, and changes in, liquid distributions, wetted areas, and film thickness under various gas and liquid flow rates. An increase in values of the We number led to a more uniform liquid distribution, and the flow patterns changed from droplet flow to film flow and trickle flow as the We number was increased. In contrast, an increase in gas flow rate had no significant effect on the wetted areas and liquid holdup. It was also determined that the number of liquid inlets affected flow behavior, and the liquid surface tension had an insignificant influence on pressure drop or liquid holdup; however, lower surface tension provided a larger wetted area and a thinner film. An experimental study, performed to enable comparisons between experimentally measured pressure drops and simulation-determined pressure drops, showed close correspondence and similar trends between the experimental data and the simulation data; hence, it was concluded that the simulation model was validated and could reasonably predict flow dynamics within a counter-current flow packed bed.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Yang & Fang Liu & Zhengchang Song & Kunlei Liu & Kozo Saito, 2018. "3D Numerical Study of Multiphase Counter-Current Flow within a Packed Bed for Post Combustion Carbon Dioxide Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:6:p:1441-:d:150513
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/6/1441/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/6/1441/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li Yang & Fang Liu & Kozo Saito & Kunlei Liu, 2018. "CFD Modeling on Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Multiphase Counter-Current Flow in a Structured Packed Bed for Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Miguel Ángel Gómez & Rubén Martín & Joaquín Collazo & Jacobo Porteiro, 2018. "CFD Steady Model Applied to a Biomass Boiler Operating in Air Enrichment Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:6:p:1441-:d:150513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.