IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i5p1280-d146918.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gasification of Agroresidues for Syngas Production

Author

Listed:
  • Nadia Cerone

    (ENEA, Energy Technologies Department, ss Jonica 106, 75026 Rotondella, Italy)

  • Francesco Zimbardi

    (ENEA, Energy Technologies Department, ss Jonica 106, 75026 Rotondella, Italy)

Abstract

Biomass residues from agriculture and agroindustry are suitable sources for the production of energy because they don’t compete with the food chain and they are produced cheaply. Their transformation into heat and power or energy vectors depends on morphology and composition. Shells of almonds and hazelnuts can be easily gasified in fixed beds because of their low fines content and high gas permeation. In this work we investigated the overall process performances and syngas composition, especially the H 2 /CO ratio, by changing the air and steam supply. The tests were carried out in a pilot updraft gasifier having a capacity of treating up to 20–30 kg/h of biomass. Experimental data were worked out by surface response analysis as function of the equivalence ratios (ER) in relation to the complete combustion and water reaction. By using only air at ER(O 2 ) 0.24 the ratio H 2 /CO in the syngas was 0.33 while adding steam at ER(H 2 O) 0.28 the ratio reached a value of 1.0. The energy conversion efficiency from solid to gas and oils reached maximum values of 76% and 28%, respectively. As anticipated by TGA, hazelnut shells produced less organic volatiles and gas efficiency was generally higher than for almond shells.

Suggested Citation

  • Nadia Cerone & Francesco Zimbardi, 2018. "Gasification of Agroresidues for Syngas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:5:p:1280-:d:146918
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/5/1280/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/5/1280/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arthur M. James R. & Wenqiao Yuan & Michael D. Boyette, 2016. "The Effect of Biomass Physical Properties on Top-Lit Updraft Gasification of Woodchips," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Dimitriou, Ioanna & Goldingay, Harry & Bridgwater, Anthony V., 2018. "Techno-economic and uncertainty analysis of Biomass to Liquid (BTL) systems for transport fuel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 160-175.
    3. Rukshan Jayathilake & Souman Rudra, 2017. "Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Equivalence Ratio (ER) and Feedstock Particle Size on Birchwood Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Prins, Mark J. & Ptasinski, Krzysztof J. & Janssen, Frans J.J.G., 2007. "From coal to biomass gasification: Comparison of thermodynamic efficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1248-1259.
    5. Rabinovich, Mikhail L. & Fedoryak, Olesya & Dobele, Galina & Andersone, Anna & Gawdzik, Barbara & Lindström, Mikael E. & Sevastyanova, Olena, 2016. "Carbon adsorbents from industrial hydrolysis lignin: The USSR/Eastern European experience and its importance for modern biorefineries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1008-1024.
    6. Dongdong Feng & Yijun Zhao & Yu Zhang & Shaozeng Sun & Jianmin Gao, 2018. "Steam Gasification of Sawdust Biochar Influenced by Chemical Speciation of Alkali and Alkaline Earth Metallic Species," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    7. James Daniell & Michael Köpke & Séan Dennis Simpson, 2012. "Commercial Biomass Syngas Fermentation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(12), pages 1-46, December.
    8. Ricardo A. Narváez C. & Richard Blanchard & Roger Dixon & Valeria Ramírez & Diego Chulde, 2018. "Low-Cost Syngas Shifting for Remote Gasifiers: Combination of CO 2 Adsorption and Catalyst Addition in a Novel and Simplified Packed Structure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, February.
    9. Emami Taba, Leila & Irfan, Muhammad Faisal & Wan Daud, Wan Ashri Mohd & Chakrabarti, Mohammed Harun, 2012. "The effect of temperature on various parameters in coal, biomass and CO-gasification: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 5584-5596.
    10. Dogru, M. & Howarth, C.R. & Akay, G. & Keskinler, B. & Malik, A.A., 2002. "Gasification of hazelnut shells in a downdraft gasifier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 415-427.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Francesco Gallucci & Raffaele Liberatore & Luca Sapegno & Edoardo Volponi & Paolo Venturini & Franco Rispoli & Enrico Paris & Monica Carnevale & Andrea Colantoni, 2019. "Influence of Oxidant Agent on Syngas Composition: Gasification of Hazelnut Shells through an Updraft Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Qi, Jingwei & Wang, Yijie & Hu, Ming & Xu, Pengcheng & Yuan, Haoran & Chen, Yong, 2023. "A reactor network of biomass gasification process in an updraft gasifier based on the fully kinetic model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    3. Dimitar Karakashev & Yifeng Zhang, 2018. "BioEnergy and BioChemicals Production from Biomass and Residual Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-6, August.
    4. Nadia Cerone & Francesco Zimbardi, 2021. "Effects of Oxygen and Steam Equivalence Ratios on Updraft Gasification of Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Özdenkçi, Karhan & Prestipino, Mauro & Björklund-Sänkiaho, Margareta & Galvagno, Antonio & De Blasio, Cataldo, 2020. "Alternative energy valorization routes of black liquor by stepwise supercritical water gasification: Effect of process parameters on hydrogen yield and energy efficiency," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    2. Mendiburu, Andrés Z. & Carvalho, João A. & Coronado, Christian J.R., 2014. "Thermochemical equilibrium modeling of biomass downdraft gasifier: Stoichiometric models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 189-201.
    3. La Villetta, M. & Costa, M. & Massarotti, N., 2017. "Modelling approaches to biomass gasification: A review with emphasis on the stoichiometric method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 71-88.
    4. Silva, Isabelly P. & Lima, Rafael M.A. & Santana, Hortência E.P. & Silva, Gabriel F. & Ruzene, Denise S. & Silva, Daniel P., 2022. "Development of a semi-empirical model for woody biomass gasification based on stoichiometric thermodynamic equilibrium model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    5. Francesco Gallucci & Raffaele Liberatore & Luca Sapegno & Edoardo Volponi & Paolo Venturini & Franco Rispoli & Enrico Paris & Monica Carnevale & Andrea Colantoni, 2019. "Influence of Oxidant Agent on Syngas Composition: Gasification of Hazelnut Shells through an Updraft Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Yin Pang & Leo Bahr & Peter Fendt & Lars Zigan & Stefan Will & Thomas Hammer & Manfred Baldauf & Robert Fleck & Dominik Müller & Jürgen Karl, 2018. "Plasma-Assisted Biomass Gasification with Focus on Carbon Conversion and Reaction Kinetics Compared to Thermal Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-24, May.
    7. Ibrahim, A. & Veremieiev, S. & Gaskell, P.H., 2022. "An advanced, comprehensive thermochemical equilibrium model of a downdraft biomass gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 912-925.
    8. Kotowicz, Janusz & Sobolewski, Aleksander & Iluk, Tomasz, 2013. "Energetic analysis of a system integrated with biomass gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 265-278.
    9. Chen, Wei & Annamalai, Kalyan & Ansley, R. James & Mirik, Mustafa, 2012. "Updraft fixed bed gasification of mesquite and juniper wood samples," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 454-461.
    10. Mushtaq, Faisal & Mat, Ramli & Ani, Farid Nasir, 2014. "A review on microwave assisted pyrolysis of coal and biomass for fuel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 555-574.
    11. Zhang, Ziyin & Pang, Shusheng & Levi, Tana, 2017. "Influence of AAEM species in coal and biomass on steam co-gasification of chars of blended coal and biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 356-363.
    12. Ramachandriya, Karthikeyan D. & Kundiyana, Dimple K. & Wilkins, Mark R. & Terrill, Jennine B. & Atiyeh, Hasan K. & Huhnke, Raymond L., 2013. "Carbon dioxide conversion to fuels and chemicals using a hybrid green process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 289-299.
    13. Gassner, Martin & Maréchal, François, 2009. "Thermodynamic comparison of the FICFB and Viking gasification concepts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1744-1753.
    14. Balcombe, Paul & Speirs, Jamie & Johnson, Erin & Martin, Jeanne & Brandon, Nigel & Hawkes, Adam, 2018. "The carbon credentials of hydrogen gas networks and supply chains," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1077-1088.
    15. Loha, Chanchal & Chattopadhyay, Himadri & Chatterjee, Pradip K., 2011. "Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen rich synthetic gas generation from fluidized bed gasification of rice husk," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 4063-4071.
    16. Zhang, Zhikun & Zhu, Zongyuan & Shen, Boxiong & Liu, Lina, 2019. "Insights into biochar and hydrochar production and applications: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 581-598.
    17. Navas-Anguita, Zaira & García-Gusano, Diego & Iribarren, Diego, 2019. "A review of techno-economic data for road transportation fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 11-26.
    18. Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Sharifzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi Moftakhari, 2017. "Conceptual and basic design of a novel integrated cogeneration power plant energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 516-533.
    19. Millinger, M. & Reichenberg, L. & Hedenus, F. & Berndes, G. & Zeyen, E. & Brown, T., 2022. "Are biofuel mandates cost-effective? - An analysis of transport fuels and biomass usage to achieve emissions targets in the European energy system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    20. Po-Chih Kuo & Wei Wu, 2014. "Design, Optimization and Energetic Efficiency of Producing Hydrogen-Rich Gas from Biomass Steam Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:5:p:1280-:d:146918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.