IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i1p238-d127798.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New PV Array Fault Diagnosis Method Using Fuzzy C-Mean Clustering and Fuzzy Membership Algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Qiang Zhao

    (School of Control and Computer Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Shuai Shao

    (School of Control and Computer Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Lingxing Lu

    (School of Renewable Energy, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Xin Liu

    (School of Control and Computer Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Honglu Zhu

    (School of Renewable Energy, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
    State Key Laboratory of Alternate Electrical Power System with Renewable Energy Sources, North China Electric Power University, Changping District, Beijing 102206, China)

Abstract

Photovoltaic (PV) power station faults in the natural environment mainly occur in the PV array, and the accurate fault diagnosis is of particular significance for the safe and efficient PV power plant operation. The PV array’s electrical behavior characteristics under fault conditions is analyzed in this paper, and a novel PV array fault diagnosis method is proposed based on fuzzy C-mean (FCM) and fuzzy membership algorithms. Firstly, clustering analysis of PV array fault samples is conducted using the FCM algorithm, indicating that there is a fixed relationship between the distribution characteristics of cluster centers and the different fault, then the fault samples are classified effectively. The membership degrees of all fault data and cluster centers are then determined by the fuzzy membership algorithm for the final fault diagnosis. Simulation analysis indicated that the diagnostic accuracy of the proposed method was 96%. Field experiments further verified the correctness and effectiveness of the proposed method. In this paper, various types of fault distribution features are effectively identified by the FCM algorithm, whether the PV array operation parameters belong to the fault category is determined by fuzzy membership algorithm, and the advantage of the proposed method is it can classify the fault data from normal operating data without foreknowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiang Zhao & Shuai Shao & Lingxing Lu & Xin Liu & Honglu Zhu, 2018. "A New PV Array Fault Diagnosis Method Using Fuzzy C-Mean Clustering and Fuzzy Membership Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:1:p:238-:d:127798
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/1/238/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/1/238/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giovanni Cipriani & Antonino D’Amico & Stefania Guarino & Donatella Manno & Marzia Traverso & Vincenzo Di Dio, 2020. "Convolutional Neural Network for Dust and Hotspot Classification in PV Modules," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Sunme Park & Soyeong Park & Myungsun Kim & Euiseok Hwang, 2020. "Clustering-Based Self-Imputation of Unlabeled Fault Data in a Fleet of Photovoltaic Generation Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Mellit, Adel & Kalogirou, Soteris, 2021. "Artificial intelligence and internet of things to improve efficacy of diagnosis and remote sensing of solar photovoltaic systems: Challenges, recommendations and future directions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    4. Imran Hussain & Ihsan Ullah Khalil & Aqsa Islam & Mati Ullah Ahsan & Taosif Iqbal & Md. Shahariar Chowdhury & Kuaanan Techato & Nasim Ullah, 2022. "Unified Fuzzy Logic Based Approach for Detection and Classification of PV Faults Using I-V Trend Line," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-14, July.
    5. Wilfried van Sark, 2019. "Photovoltaic System Design and Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-6, May.
    6. Hao Wu & Lin Zhou & Yihao Wan & Qiang Liu & Siyu Zhou, 2019. "A Mixed Uncertainty Power Flow Algorithm-Based Centralized Photovoltaic (PV) Cluster," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Ramadoss Janarthanan & R. Uma Maheshwari & Prashant Kumar Shukla & Piyush Kumar Shukla & Seyedali Mirjalili & Manoj Kumar, 2021. "Intelligent Detection of the PV Faults Based on Artificial Neural Network and Type 2 Fuzzy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Bojan Kranjec & Sasa Sladic & Wojciech Giernacki & Neven Bulic, 2018. "PV System Design and Flight Efficiency Considerations for Fixed-Wing Radio-Controlled Aircraft—A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-12, October.
    9. Juan M. Cano & Aranzazu D. Martin & Reyes S. Herrera & Jesus R. Vazquez & Francisco Javier Ruiz-Rodriguez, 2021. "Grid-Connected PV Systems Controlled by Sliding via Wireless Communication," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, March.
    10. Alonso Gutiérrez Galeano & Michael Bressan & Fernando Jiménez Vargas & Corinne Alonso, 2018. "Shading Ratio Impact on Photovoltaic Modules and Correlation with Shading Patterns," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-26, April.
    11. Gomathy Balasubramani & Venkatesan Thangavelu & Muniraj Chinnusamy & Umashankar Subramaniam & Sanjeevikumar Padmanaban & Lucian Mihet-Popa, 2020. "Infrared Thermography Based Defects Testing of Solar Photovoltaic Panel with Fuzzy Rule-Based Evaluation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, March.
    12. Wang, Haizheng & Zhao, Jian & Sun, Qian & Zhu, Honglu, 2019. "Probability modeling for PV array output interval and its application in fault diagnosis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    13. Dan Craciunescu & Laurentiu Fara, 2023. "Investigation of the Partial Shading Effect of Photovoltaic Panels and Optimization of Their Performance Based on High-Efficiency FLC Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-28, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:1:p:238-:d:127798. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.