IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i1p117-d125336.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Conductor-Temperature Calculations Based on Different Radial-Position-Temperature Detections for High-Voltage Power Cable

Author

Listed:
  • Lin Yang

    (School of Electric Power, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China)

  • Weihao Qiu

    (School of Electric Power, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China)

  • Jichao Huang

    (School of Electric Power, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China)

  • Yanpeng Hao

    (School of Electric Power, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China)

  • Mingli Fu

    (Electric Power Research Institute, China Southern Power Grid, Guangzhou 510080, China)

  • Shuai Hou

    (Electric Power Research Institute, China Southern Power Grid, Guangzhou 510080, China)

  • Licheng Li

    (School of Electric Power, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China)

Abstract

In this paper, the calculation of the conductor temperature is related to the temperature sensor position in high-voltage power cables and four thermal circuits—based on the temperatures of insulation shield, the center of waterproof compound, the aluminum sheath, and the jacket surface are established to calculate the conductor temperature. To examine the effectiveness of conductor temperature calculations, simulation models based on flow characteristics of the air gap between the waterproof compound and the aluminum are built up, and thermocouples are placed at the four radial positions in a 110 kV cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) insulated power cable to measure the temperatures of four positions. In measurements, six cases of current heating test under three laying environments, such as duct, water, and backfilled soil were carried out. Both errors of the conductor temperature calculation and the simulation based on the temperature of insulation shield were significantly smaller than others under all laying environments. It is the uncertainty of the thermal resistivity, together with the difference of the initial temperature of each radial position by the solar radiation, which led to the above results. The thermal capacitance of the air has little impact on errors. The thermal resistance of the air gap is the largest error source. Compromising the temperature-estimation accuracy and the insulation-damage risk, the waterproof compound is the recommended sensor position to improve the accuracy of conductor-temperature calculation. When the thermal resistances were calculated correctly, the aluminum sheath is also the recommended sensor position besides the waterproof compound.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin Yang & Weihao Qiu & Jichao Huang & Yanpeng Hao & Mingli Fu & Shuai Hou & Licheng Li, 2018. "Comparison of Conductor-Temperature Calculations Based on Different Radial-Position-Temperature Detections for High-Voltage Power Cable," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:1:p:117-:d:125336
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/1/117/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/1/117/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jintae Cho & Jae-Han Kim & Hak-Ju Lee & Ju-Yong Kim & Il-Keun Song & Joon-Ho Choi, 2014. "Development and Improvement of an Intelligent Cable Monitoring System for Underground Distribution Networks Using Distributed Temperature Sensing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-19, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michał Borecki, 2020. "A Proposed New Approach for the Assessment of Selected Operating Conditions of the High Voltage Cable Line," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Tomasz Szczegielniak & Paweł Jabłoński & Dariusz Kusiak, 2023. "Analytical Approach to Current Rating of Three-Phase Power Cable with Round Conductors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Kui Liu & Renato Zagorščak & Richard J. Sandford & Oliver N. Cwikowski & Alexander Yanushkevich & Hywel R. Thomas, 2022. "Insights into the Thermal Performance of Underground High Voltage Electricity Transmission Lines through Thermo-Hydraulic Modelling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-25, November.
    4. Karol Nowak & Jerzy Janiszewski & Grzegorz Dombek, 2019. "Thyristor Arc Eliminator for Protection of Low Voltage Electrical Equipment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-15, July.
    5. Kyu-hoon Park & Il Kwon & Bang-wook Lee, 2021. "Calculation Method of Allowable Continuous Current for Direct Burial Laying HVDC Underground Cable," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qing Yang & Bo Zhang & Jiaquan Ran & Song Chen & Yanxiao He & Jian Sun, 2017. "Measurement of Line-to-Ground Capacitance in Distribution Network Considering Magnetizing Impedance’s Frequency Characteristic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Fan Yang & Kai Liu & Peng Cheng & Shaohua Wang & Xiaoyu Wang & Bing Gao & Yalin Fang & Rong Xia & Irfan Ullah, 2016. "The Coupling Fields Characteristics of Cable Joints and Application in the Evaluation of Crimping Process Defects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Raquel Martinez & Mario Manana & Alberto Arroyo & Sergio Bustamante & Alberto Laso & Pablo Castro & Rafael Minguez, 2021. "Dynamic Rating Management of Overhead Transmission Lines Operating under Multiple Weather Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Phillips, Tyler & DeLeon, Rey & Senocak, Inanc, 2017. "Dynamic rating of overhead transmission lines over complex terrain using a large-eddy simulation paradigm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 380-389.
    5. Alberto Arroyo & Pablo Castro & Raquel Martinez & Mario Manana & Alfredo Madrazo & Ramón Lecuna & Antonio Gonzalez, 2015. "Comparison between IEEE and CIGRE Thermal Behaviour Standards and Measured Temperature on a 132-kV Overhead Power Line," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-12, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:1:p:117-:d:125336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.