IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i11p2932-d178651.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental Evaluation of Radiant Heating Ceiling Systems Based on Thermal Comfort Criteria

Author

Listed:
  • M. Reza Safizadeh

    (Building Science Group (fbta), Institute for Building Design and Technology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany)

  • Marcel Schweiker

    (Building Science Group (fbta), Institute for Building Design and Technology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany)

  • Andreas Wagner

    (Building Science Group (fbta), Institute for Building Design and Technology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany)

Abstract

Low-temperature radiant heating systems can be considered as suitable candidates for the refurbishment of old heating systems. These systems are proven to save energy, however, their drawback is their impact on the creation of radiant temperature asymmetry and local thermal discomfort, especially in old buildings where the temperatures of surfaces (for example external walls with a low level of insulation and large windows) are low. This study aims to evaluate the potential application of low-temperature radiant ceiling heating systems (28–38 °C) in old and energy-renovated buildings, based on subjective experiments and thermal comfort criteria such as thermal sensation, comfort, satisfaction, and sensation asymmetry votes. Later, in the Discussion section, the guideline for the radiant temperature asymmetry for the warm ceiling presented in ASHRAE Standard-55 is corrected for relatively low air temperatures and different surface temperatures corresponding to “about neutral” conditions for winter clothing. Findings of this research show that the radiant ceiling heating system operating at low temperatures (33–38 °C) can provide fairly neutral thermal sensation and satisfactory comfort at the majority of body-parts, if the building envelope satisfies advanced building energy-efficiency regulations. Additionally, the experimental analyses imply that limitation of 5% suggested by ASHRAE-55 for the percentage of dissatisfied occupants feeling uncomfortable due to overhead radiation can be elevated to 10%.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Reza Safizadeh & Marcel Schweiker & Andreas Wagner, 2018. "Experimental Evaluation of Radiant Heating Ceiling Systems Based on Thermal Comfort Criteria," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:11:p:2932-:d:178651
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/11/2932/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/11/2932/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Sauerwein & Niall Fitzgerald & Christoph Kuhn, 2023. "Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Temperature Reduction Potentials in the Heating Supply of an Unrenovated University Building," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Beungyong Park & Seong Ryong Ryu & Chang Heon Cheong, 2020. "Thermal Comfort Analysis of Combined Radiation-Convection Floor Heating System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, March.
    3. M. Reza Safizadeh & Lukasz Watly & Andreas Wagner, 2019. "Evaluation of Radiant Heating Ceiling Based on Energy and Thermal Comfort Criteria, Part II: A Numerical Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-23, September.
    4. Ahmet Bircan Atmaca & Gülay Zorer Gedik & Andreas Wagner, 2021. "Determination of Optimum Envelope of Religious Buildings in Terms of Thermal Comfort and Energy Consumption: Mosque Cases," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:11:p:2932-:d:178651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.