IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i11p2891-d178011.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hybrid Imperialist Competitive and Grey Wolf Algorithm to Solve Multiobjective Optimal Power Flow with Wind and Solar Units

Author

Listed:
  • Jalel Ben Hmida

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70504, USA)

  • Mohammad Javad Morshed

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70504, USA)

  • Jim Lee

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70504, USA)

  • Terrence Chambers

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70504, USA)

Abstract

The optimal power flow (OPF) module optimizes the generation, transmission, and distribution of electric power without disrupting network power flow, operating limits, or constraints. Similarly to any power flow analysis technique, OPF also allows the determination of system’s state of operation, that is, the injected power, current, and voltage throughout the electric power system. In this context, there is a large range of OPF problems and different approaches to solve them. Moreover, the nature of OPF is evolving due to renewable energy integration and recent flexibility in power grids. This paper presents an original hybrid imperialist competitive and grey wolf algorithm (HIC-GWA) to solve twelve different study cases of simple and multiobjective OPF problems for modern power systems, including wind and photovoltaic power generators. The performance capabilities and potential of the proposed metaheuristic are presented, illustrating the applicability of the approach, and analyzed on two test systems: the IEEE 30 bus and IEEE 118 bus power systems. Sensitivity analysis has been performed on this approach to prove the robustness of the method. Obtained results are analyzed and compared with recently published OPF solutions. The proposed metaheuristic is more efficient and provides much better optimal solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jalel Ben Hmida & Mohammad Javad Morshed & Jim Lee & Terrence Chambers, 2018. "Hybrid Imperialist Competitive and Grey Wolf Algorithm to Solve Multiobjective Optimal Power Flow with Wind and Solar Units," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:11:p:2891-:d:178011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/11/2891/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/11/2891/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ghasemi, Mojtaba & Ghavidel, Sahand & Ghanbarian, Mohammad Mehdi & Gharibzadeh, Masihallah & Azizi Vahed, Ali, 2014. "Multi-objective optimal power flow considering the cost, emission, voltage deviation and power losses using multi-objective modified imperialist competitive algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 276-289.
    2. Morshed, Mohammad Javad & Hmida, Jalel Ben & Fekih, Afef, 2018. "A probabilistic multi-objective approach for power flow optimization in hybrid wind-PV-PEV systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 1136-1149.
    3. Ghasemi, Mojtaba & Ghavidel, Sahand & Akbari, Ebrahim & Vahed, Ali Azizi, 2014. "Solving non-linear, non-smooth and non-convex optimal power flow problems using chaotic invasive weed optimization algorithms based on chaos," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 340-353.
    4. Narimani, Mohammad Rasoul & Azizipanah-Abarghooee, Rasoul & Zoghdar-Moghadam-Shahrekohne, Behrouz & Gholami, Kayvan, 2013. "A novel approach to multi-objective optimal power flow by a new hybrid optimization algorithm considering generator constraints and multi-fuel type," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 119-136.
    5. Ghasemi, Mojtaba & Ghavidel, Sahand & Aghaei, Jamshid & Gitizadeh, Mohsen & Falah, Hasan, 2014. "Application of chaos-based chaotic invasive weed optimization techniques for environmental OPF problems in the power system," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 271-284.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ali S. Alghamdi, 2022. "Optimal Power Flow in Wind–Photovoltaic Energy Regulation Systems Using a Modified Turbulent Water Flow-Based Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-27, December.
    2. Francisco G. Montoya & Raúl Baños & Alfredo Alcayde & Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro, 2019. "Optimization Methods Applied to Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-8, June.
    3. Shahenda Sarhan & Ragab El-Sehiemy & Amlak Abaza & Mona Gafar, 2022. "Turbulent Flow of Water-Based Optimization for Solving Multi-Objective Technical and Economic Aspects of Optimal Power Flow Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khaled Nusair & Lina Alhmoud, 2020. "Application of Equilibrium Optimizer Algorithm for Optimal Power Flow with High Penetration of Renewable Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-35, November.
    2. Fitiwi, Desta Z. & Olmos, L. & Rivier, M. & de Cuadra, F. & Pérez-Arriaga, I.J., 2016. "Finding a representative network losses model for large-scale transmission expansion planning with renewable energy sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 343-358.
    3. Zhang, Jingrui & Wang, Silu & Tang, Qinghui & Zhou, Yulu & Zeng, Tao, 2019. "An improved NSGA-III integrating adaptive elimination strategy to solution of many-objective optimal power flow problems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 945-957.
    4. Li, Shuijia & Gong, Wenyin & Wang, Ling & Yan, Xuesong & Hu, Chengyu, 2020. "Optimal power flow by means of improved adaptive differential evolution," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    5. Khaled Nusair & Feras Alasali, 2020. "Optimal Power Flow Management System for a Power Network with Stochastic Renewable Energy Resources Using Golden Ratio Optimization Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-46, July.
    6. Ali S. Alghamdi, 2022. "Optimal Power Flow in Wind–Photovoltaic Energy Regulation Systems Using a Modified Turbulent Water Flow-Based Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-27, December.
    7. Li, Shuijia & Gong, Wenyin & Hu, Chengyu & Yan, Xuesong & Wang, Ling & Gu, Qiong, 2021. "Adaptive constraint differential evolution for optimal power flow," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    8. Ghasemi, Mojtaba & Ghavidel, Sahand & Aghaei, Jamshid & Gitizadeh, Mohsen & Falah, Hasan, 2014. "Application of chaos-based chaotic invasive weed optimization techniques for environmental OPF problems in the power system," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 271-284.
    9. Ghasemi, Mojtaba & Ghavidel, Sahand & Ghanbarian, Mohammad Mehdi & Gharibzadeh, Masihallah & Azizi Vahed, Ali, 2014. "Multi-objective optimal power flow considering the cost, emission, voltage deviation and power losses using multi-objective modified imperialist competitive algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 276-289.
    10. Mohamed S. Hashish & Hany M. Hasanien & Haoran Ji & Abdulaziz Alkuhayli & Mohammed Alharbi & Tlenshiyeva Akmaral & Rania A. Turky & Francisco Jurado & Ahmed O. Badr, 2023. "Monte Carlo Simulation and a Clustering Technique for Solving the Probabilistic Optimal Power Flow Problem for Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, January.
    11. Sherif S. M. Ghoneim & Mohamed F. Kotb & Hany M. Hasanien & Mosleh M. Alharthi & Attia A. El-Fergany, 2021. "Cost Minimizations and Performance Enhancements of Power Systems Using Spherical Prune Differential Evolution Algorithm Including Modal Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-15, July.
    12. Sirote Khunkitti & Apirat Siritaratiwat & Suttichai Premrudeepreechacharn & Rongrit Chatthaworn & Neville R. Watson, 2018. "A Hybrid DA-PSO Optimization Algorithm for Multiobjective Optimal Power Flow Problems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, August.
    13. Hao Su & Qun Niu & Zhile Yang, 2023. "Optimal Power Flow Using Improved Cross-Entropy Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-33, July.
    14. Secui, Dinu Calin, 2015. "The chaotic global best artificial bee colony algorithm for the multi-area economic/emission dispatch," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2518-2545.
    15. Li, Yang & Li, Yahui & Li, Guoqing & Zhao, Dongbo & Chen, Chen, 2018. "Two-stage multi-objective OPF for AC/DC grids with VSC-HVDC: Incorporating decisions analysis into optimization process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 286-296.
    16. Gonggui Chen & Xingting Yi & Zhizhong Zhang & Hangtian Lei, 2018. "Solving the Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow Problem Using the Multi-Objective Firefly Algorithm with a Constraints-Prior Pareto-Domination Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Wang, Yongli & Wang, Yudong & Huang, Yujing & Yang, Jiale & Ma, Yuze & Yu, Haiyang & Zeng, Ming & Zhang, Fuwei & Zhang, Yanfu, 2019. "Operation optimization of regional integrated energy system based on the modeling of electricity-thermal-natural gas network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    18. Zhu, Jianhua & Peng, Yan & Gong, Zhuping & Sun, Yanming & Lai, Chaoan & Wang, Qing & Zhu, Xiaojun & Gan, Zhongxue, 2019. "Dynamic analysis of SNG and PNG supply: The stability and robustness view #," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 717-729.
    19. Jaszczur, Marek & Hassan, Qusay & Palej, Patryk & Abdulateef, Jasim, 2020. "Multi-Objective optimisation of a micro-grid hybrid power system for household application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    20. Xiao, Qing & Zhou, Shaowu, 2018. "Probabilistic power flow computation considering correlated wind speeds," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 677-685.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:11:p:2891-:d:178011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.