IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v10y2017i11p1697-d116370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison Study of a Generic Coupling Methodology for Modeling Wake Effects of Wave Energy Converter Arrays

Author

Listed:
  • Tim Verbrugghe

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Ghent University, Technologiepark 904, B-9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium)

  • Vicky Stratigaki

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Ghent University, Technologiepark 904, B-9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium)

  • Peter Troch

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Ghent University, Technologiepark 904, B-9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium)

  • Raphael Rabussier

    (Department of General Engineering, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, 36 avenue Guy de Collongue, 69134 Écully, France)

  • Andreas Kortenhaus

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Ghent University, Technologiepark 904, B-9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium)

Abstract

Wave Energy Converters (WECs) need to be deployed in large numbers in an array layout in order to have a significant power production. Each WEC has an impact on the incoming wave field, by diffracting, reflecting and radiating waves. Simulating the wave transformations within and around a WEC array is complex; it is difficult, or in some cases impossible, to simulate both these near-field and far-field wake effects using a single numerical model, in a time- and cost-efficient way in terms of computational time and effort. Within this research, a generic coupling methodology is developed to model both near-field and far-field wake effects caused by floating (e.g., WECs, platforms) or fixed offshore structures. The methodology is based on the coupling of a wave-structure interaction solver (Nemoh) and a wave propagation model. In this paper, this methodology is applied to two wave propagation models (OceanWave3D and MILDwave), which are compared to each other in a wide spectrum of tests. Additionally, the Nemoh-OceanWave3D model is validated by comparing it to experimental wave basin data. The methodology proves to be a reliable instrument to model wake effects of WEC arrays; results demonstrate a high degree of agreement between the numerical simulations with relative errors lower than 5 % and to a lesser extent for the experimental data, where errors range from 4 % to 17 % .

Suggested Citation

  • Tim Verbrugghe & Vicky Stratigaki & Peter Troch & Raphael Rabussier & Andreas Kortenhaus, 2017. "A Comparison Study of a Generic Coupling Methodology for Modeling Wake Effects of Wave Energy Converter Arrays," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:11:p:1697-:d:116370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/11/1697/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/11/1697/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agamloh, Emmanuel B. & Wallace, Alan K. & von Jouanne, Annette, 2008. "Application of fluid–structure interaction simulation of an ocean wave energy extraction device," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 748-757.
    2. Vasiliki Stratigaki & Peter Troch & Tim Stallard & David Forehand & Jens Peter Kofoed & Matt Folley & Michel Benoit & Aurélien Babarit & Jens Kirkegaard, 2014. "Wave Basin Experiments with Large Wave Energy Converter Arrays to Study Interactions between the Converters and Effects on Other Users in the Sea and the Coastal Area," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-34, February.
    3. Li, Ye & Yu, Yi-Hsiang, 2012. "A synthesis of numerical methods for modeling wave energy converter-point absorbers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 4352-4364.
    4. Beels, Charlotte & Troch, Peter & De Visch, Kenneth & Kofoed, Jens Peter & De Backer, Griet, 2010. "Application of the time-dependent mild-slope equations for the simulation of wake effects in the lee of a farm of Wave Dragon wave energy converters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 1644-1661.
    5. Beels, Charlotte & Troch, Peter & Kofoed, Jens Peter & Frigaard, Peter & Vindahl Kringelum, Jon & Carsten Kromann, Peter & Heyman Donovan, Martin & De Rouck, Julien & De Backer, Griet, 2011. "A methodology for production and cost assessment of a farm of wave energy converters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 3402-3416.
    6. Carballo, R. & Iglesias, G., 2013. "Wave farm impact based on realistic wave-WEC interaction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 216-229.
    7. Gunn, Kester & Stock-Williams, Clym, 2012. "Quantifying the global wave power resource," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 296-304.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rijnsdorp, Dirk P. & Hansen, Jeff E. & Lowe, Ryan J., 2020. "Understanding coastal impacts by nearshore wave farms using a phase-resolving wave model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 637-648.
    2. Philip Balitsky & Gael Verao Fernandez & Vasiliki Stratigaki & Peter Troch, 2018. "Assessment of the Power Output of a Two-Array Clustered WEC Farm Using a BEM Solver Coupling and a Wave-Propagation Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Philip Balitsky & Nicolas Quartier & Gael Verao Fernandez & Vasiliki Stratigaki & Peter Troch, 2018. "Analyzing the Near-Field Effects and the Power Production of an Array of Heaving Cylindrical WECs and OSWECs Using a Coupled Hydrodynamic-PTO Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-32, December.
    4. He, Guanghua & Luan, Zhengxiao & Zhang, Wei & He, Runhua & Liu, Chaogang & Yang, Kaibo & Yang, Changhao & Jing, Penglin & Zhang, Zhigang, 2023. "Review on research approaches for multi-point absorber wave energy converters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    5. David, Daniel R. & Rijnsdorp, Dirk P. & Hansen, Jeff E. & Lowe, Ryan J. & Buckley, Mark L., 2022. "Predicting coastal impacts by wave farms: A comparison of wave-averaged and wave-resolving models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 764-780.
    6. Hong-Wei Fang & Yu-Zhu Feng & Guo-Ping Li, 2018. "Optimization of Wave Energy Converter Arrays by an Improved Differential Evolution Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Gael Verao Fernández & Vasiliki Stratigaki & Peter Troch, 2019. "Irregular Wave Validation of a Coupling Methodology for Numerical Modelling of Near and Far Field Effects of Wave Energy Converter Arrays," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, February.
    8. Gael Verao Fernandez & Philip Balitsky & Vasiliki Stratigaki & Peter Troch, 2018. "Coupling Methodology for Studying the Far Field Effects of Wave Energy Converter Arrays over a Varying Bathymetry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gael Verao Fernández & Vasiliki Stratigaki & Peter Troch, 2019. "Irregular Wave Validation of a Coupling Methodology for Numerical Modelling of Near and Far Field Effects of Wave Energy Converter Arrays," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Stratigaki, Vasiliki & Troch, Peter & Forehand, David, 2019. "A fundamental coupling methodology for modeling near-field and far-field wave effects of floating structures and wave energy devices," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1608-1627.
    3. Azam, Ali & Ahmed, Ammar & Yi, Minyi & Zhang, Zutao & Zhang, Zeqiang & Aslam, Touqeer & Mugheri, Shoukat Ali & Abdelrahman, Mansour & Ali, Asif & Qi, Lingfei, 2024. "Wave energy evolution: Knowledge structure, advancements, challenges and future opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    4. Luczko, Ewelina & Robertson, Bryson & Bailey, Helen & Hiles, Clayton & Buckham, Bradley, 2018. "Representing non-linear wave energy converters in coastal wave models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 376-385.
    5. He, Guanghua & Luan, Zhengxiao & Zhang, Wei & He, Runhua & Liu, Chaogang & Yang, Kaibo & Yang, Changhao & Jing, Penglin & Zhang, Zhigang, 2023. "Review on research approaches for multi-point absorber wave energy converters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    6. Rosa-Santos, Paulo & Taveira-Pinto, Francisco & Rodríguez, Claudio A. & Ramos, Victor & López, Mario, 2019. "The CECO wave energy converter: Recent developments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 368-384.
    7. Coe, Ryan G. & Bacelli, Giorgio & Forbush, Dominic, 2021. "A practical approach to wave energy modeling and control," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    8. Fadaeenejad, M. & Shamsipour, R. & Rokni, S.D. & Gomes, C., 2014. "New approaches in harnessing wave energy: With special attention to small islands," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 345-354.
    9. Zheng, Chong-wei, 2021. "Global oceanic wave energy resource dataset—with the Maritime Silk Road as a case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 843-854.
    10. Faedo, Nicolás & Peña-Sanchez, Yerai & Pasta, Edoardo & Papini, Guglielmo & Mosquera, Facundo D. & Ferri, Francesco, 2023. "SWELL: An open-access experimental dataset for arrays of wave energy conversion systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 699-716.
    11. Saincher, Shaswat & Banerjee, Jyotirmay, 2016. "Influence of wave breaking on the hydrodynamics of wave energy converters: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 704-717.
    12. J. Cameron McNatt & Aaron Porter & Christopher Chartrand & Jesse Roberts, 2020. "The Performance of a Spectral Wave Model at Predicting Wave Farm Impacts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, November.
    13. Cui, Lidong & Sergiienko, Nataliia Y. & Leontini, Justin S. & Cohen, Nadav & Bennetts, Luke G. & Cazzolato, Benjamin & Turner, Ian L. & Flocard, Francois & Westcott, Amy-Rose & Cheng, Fanrui & Manasse, 2024. "Protecting coastlines by offshore wave farms: On optimising array configurations using a corrected far-field approximation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    14. Zheng, Chong Wei & Wang, Qing & Li, Chong Yin, 2017. "An overview of medium- to long-term predictions of global wave energy resources," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1492-1502.
    15. Wang, Shangming & Xu, Hao & Gao, Zhiteng & Li, Ye, 2024. "Performance analysis of a novel hybrid device with floating breakwater and wave energy converter integrated," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PB).
    16. Bharath, Aidan & Nader, Jean-Roch & Penesis, Irene & Macfarlane, Gregor, 2018. "Nonlinear hydrodynamic effects on a generic spherical wave energy converter," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 56-70.
    17. Shi, Hongda & Cao, Feifei & Liu, Zhen & Qu, Na, 2016. "Theoretical study on the power take-off estimation of heaving buoy wave energy converter," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 441-448.
    18. de Oliveira, Lucas & Santos, Ivan Felipe Silva dos & Schmidt, Nágila Lucietti & Tiago Filho, Geraldo Lúcio & Camacho, Ramiro Gustavo Ramirez & Barros, Regina Mambeli, 2021. "Economic feasibility study of ocean wave electricity generation in Brazil," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 1279-1290.
    19. Choupin, O. & Pinheiro Andutta, F. & Etemad-Shahidi, A. & Tomlinson, R., 2021. "A decision-making process for wave energy converter and location pairing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    20. Ophelie Choupin & Michael Henriksen & Amir Etemad-Shahidi & Rodger Tomlinson, 2021. "Breaking-Down and Parameterising Wave Energy Converter Costs Using the CapEx and Similitude Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-27, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:11:p:1697-:d:116370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.