IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v10y2017i10p1501-d113432.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Product to System Approaches in European Sustainable Product Policies: Analysis of the Package Concept of Heating Systems in Buildings

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Calero-Pastor

    (European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Directorate D—Sustainable Resources, Via E. Fermi, 2749, 21027 Ispra, Italy
    Université Grenoble Alpes, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 46 Avenue Félix Viallet, 38000 Grenoble, France)

  • Fabrice Mathieux

    (European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Directorate D—Sustainable Resources, Via E. Fermi, 2749, 21027 Ispra, Italy)

  • Daniel Brissaud

    (Université Grenoble Alpes, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 46 Avenue Félix Viallet, 38000 Grenoble, France)

  • Luca Castellazzi

    (European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Directorate C—Energy, Transport and Climate, Via E. Fermi, 2749, 21027 Ispra, Italy)

Abstract

Different policies with the goal of reducing energy consumption and other environmental impacts in the building sector coexist in Europe. Sustainable product polices, such as the Ecodesign and Energy Labelling Directives, have recently broadened the scope of their target product groups from a strict product approach to extended product and system approaches. Indeed, there is a potential for greater savings when the focus is at a system level rather than on regulating individual products. Product policies for space and water heating systems have recently introduced and implemented the package label, which is a modular approach, standing between the extended product and the system approaches. This paper presents a systematic analysis of the different system approaches of various policies from an engineering perspective. It analyses in detail the package concept and its features through a practical application using a real case study. It focuses on how the package concept can support decisions made in the building design phase and, in particular, how can support the choice of appropriate components based on estimating system performances. This brings building engineers and regulators closer regarding the use of more consistent data on energy performance. Finally, this paper highlights the need to improve the alignment of the building-related product policies with the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Calero-Pastor & Fabrice Mathieux & Daniel Brissaud & Luca Castellazzi, 2017. "From Product to System Approaches in European Sustainable Product Policies: Analysis of the Package Concept of Heating Systems in Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:10:p:1501-:d:113432
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/10/1501/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/10/1501/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ke, Jing & Price, Lynn & McNeil, Michael & Khanna, Nina Zheng & Zhou, Nan, 2013. "Analysis and practices of energy benchmarking for industry from the perspective of systems engineering," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 32-44.
    2. Trencher, Gregory & Castán Broto, Vanesa & Takagi, Tomoko & Sprigings, Zoe & Nishida, Yuko & Yarime, Masaru, 2016. "Innovative policy practices to advance building energy efficiency and retrofitting: Approaches, impacts and challenges in ten C40 cities," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 353-365.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Diego Menegon & Daniela Lobosco & Leopoldo Micò & Joana Fernandes, 2021. "Labeling of Installed Heating Appliances in Residential Buildings: An Energy Labeling Methodology for Improving Consumers’ Awareness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiansheng Chen & Ruisong Quan, 2021. "A spatiotemporal analysis of urban resilience to the COVID-19 pandemic in the Yangtze River Delta," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 106(1), pages 829-854, March.
    2. Lai, Yuan & Papadopoulos, Sokratis & Fuerst, Franz & Pivo, Gary & Sagi, Jacob & Kontokosta, Constantine E., 2022. "Building retrofit hurdle rates and risk aversion in energy efficiency investments," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PB).
    3. Perroni, Marcos G. & Gouvea da Costa, Sergio E. & Pinheiro de Lima, Edson & Vieira da Silva, Wesley & Tortato, Ubiratã, 2018. "Measuring energy performance: A process based approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 540-553.
    4. Salvatori, Simone & Benedetti, Miriam & Bonfà, Francesca & Introna, Vito & Ubertini, Stefano, 2018. "Inter-sectorial benchmarking of compressed air generation energy performance: Methodology based on real data gathering in large and energy-intensive industrial firms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 266-280.
    5. Trianni, Andrea & Cagno, Enrico & Bertolotti, Matteo & Thollander, Patrik & Andersson, Elias, 2019. "Energy management: A practice-based assessment model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1614-1636.
    6. Cai, Wei & Wang, Lianguo & Li, Li & Xie, Jun & Jia, Shun & Zhang, Xugang & Jiang, Zhigang & Lai, Kee-hung, 2022. "A review on methods of energy performance improvement towards sustainable manufacturing from perspectives of energy monitoring, evaluation, optimization and benchmarking," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    7. Zhao, Yue & Ke, Jing & Ni, Chun Chun & McNeil, Michael & Khanna, Nina Zheng & Zhou, Nan & Fridley, David & Li, Qiqiang, 2014. "A comparative study of energy consumption and efficiency of Japanese and Chinese manufacturing industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 45-56.
    8. Geertje Bekebrede & Ellen Van Bueren & Ivo Wenzler, 2018. "Towards a Joint Local Energy Transition Process in Urban Districts: The GO2Zero Simulation Game," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Cai, Wei & Liu, Fei & Zhang, Hua & Liu, Peiji & Tuo, Junbo, 2017. "Development of dynamic energy benchmark for mass production in machining systems for energy management and energy-efficiency improvement," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 715-725.
    10. Benedetti, Miriam & Bonfa', Francesca & Bertini, Ilaria & Introna, Vito & Ubertini, Stefano, 2018. "Explorative study on Compressed Air Systems’ energy efficiency in production and use: First steps towards the creation of a benchmarking system for large and energy-intensive industrial firms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 436-448.
    11. Wang, Ning & Wen, Zongguo & Liu, Mingqi & Guo, Jie, 2016. "Constructing an energy efficiency benchmarking system for coal production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 301-308.
    12. Cai, Wei & Liu, Fei & Zhou, XiaoNa & Xie, Jun, 2016. "Fine energy consumption allowance of workpieces in the mechanical manufacturing industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 623-633.
    13. Giri, Prashant & Sharma, Tarun, 2024. "Market instrument for the first fuel and its role in decarbonizing Indian industrial production," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    14. Gaigalis, Vygandas & Skema, Romualdas, 2015. "Analysis of the fuel and energy transition in Lithuanian industry and its sustainable development in 2005–2013 in compliance with the EU policy and strategy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 265-279.
    15. Yuan, Yuxing & Na, Hongming & Chen, Chuang & Qiu, Ziyang & Sun, Jingchao & Zhang, Lei & Du, Tao & Yang, Yuhang, 2024. "Status, challenges, and prospects of energy efficiency improvement methods in steel production: A multi-perspective review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    16. Sardarmehni, Mojtaba & Tahouni, Nassim & Panjeshahi, M. Hassan, 2017. "Benchmarking of olefin plant cold-end for shaft work consumption, using process integration concepts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 623-633.
    17. Benedetti, Miriam & Cesarotti, Vittorio & Introna, Vito & Serranti, Jacopo, 2016. "Energy consumption control automation using Artificial Neural Networks and adaptive algorithms: Proposal of a new methodology and case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 60-71.
    18. Rogers, John Geoffrey & Cooper, Samuel J. & Norman, Jon B., 2018. "Uses of industrial energy benchmarking with reference to the pulp and paper industries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 23-37.
    19. Wen, Xuanhao & Cao, Huajun & Li, Hongcheng & Zheng, Jie & Ge, Weiwei & Chen, Erheng & Gao, Xi & Hon, Bernard, 2022. "A dual energy benchmarking methodology for energy-efficient production planning and operation of discrete manufacturing systems using data mining techniques," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    20. Sucic, Boris & Al-Mansour, Fouad & Pusnik, Matevz & Vuk, Tomaz, 2016. "Context sensitive production planning and energy management approach in energy intensive industries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 63-73.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:10:p:1501-:d:113432. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.