IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v13y2025i2p30-d1579247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Corporate Policy Risk Affect Stock Liquidity? Panel Data Evidence from Listed Companies in a Major Emerging Market

Author

Listed:
  • Asis Kumar Sahu

    (Department of Economics & Finance, BITS Pilani, Pilani-Campus, Rajasthan 333031, India)

  • Byomakesh Debata

    (Department of Economics & Finance, BITS Pilani, Pilani-Campus, Rajasthan 333031, India)

  • Ştefan Cristian Gherghina

    (Department of Finance, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 6 Piata Romana, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

This study examines the impact of firms’ overall corporate policy risk on stock liquidity. This study constructs a novel overall corporate policies risk index (PRI) for firms by capturing risk embedded in managers’ different policy decisions, such as investment, financing, diversification, and cash management, by weighting each policy risk through the regression decomposition method. Using a large sample of 466 India-listed firms from the financial year 2003–2004 to 2022–2023, this study finds that there is a negative association between PRI and stock liquidity. The study further explores the information environment heterogeneity and finds that the adverse impact of a PRI is a more prominent firm that is hard to value or in a less transparent environment as compared to the transparent firms. Moreover, the adverse impact of PRI on stock liquidity is significantly more pronounced during financial crises, while its effect is less substantial during non-crisis periods. The robustness of these results is confirmed even after addressing endogeneity issues using various techniques, such as propensity score matching (PSM), two-stage least squares instrumental variable approach (2 SLS IV), and the system-generalized method of moments (System GMM).

Suggested Citation

  • Asis Kumar Sahu & Byomakesh Debata & Ştefan Cristian Gherghina, 2025. "Does Corporate Policy Risk Affect Stock Liquidity? Panel Data Evidence from Listed Companies in a Major Emerging Market," Economies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-27, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:30-:d:1579247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/13/2/30/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/13/2/30/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Asis Kumar Sahu & Byomakesh Debata & Saumya Ranjan Dash, 2024. "Manager sentiment, policy uncertainty, ESG disclosure and firm performance: a large language model in corporate landscape," International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(5), pages 858-882, July.
    2. Kose John & Lubomir Litov & Bernard Yeung, 2008. "Corporate Governance and Risk‐Taking," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 63(4), pages 1679-1728, August.
    3. Korkeamäki, Timo & Liljeblom, Eva & Pasternack, Daniel, 2017. "CEO power and matching leverage preferences," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 19-30.
    4. Kim, Karam & Ryu, Doojin & Yang, Heejin, 2021. "Information uncertainty, investor sentiment, and analyst reports," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    5. David Roodman, 2009. "How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 9(1), pages 86-136, March.
    6. Lu, Chia-Wu & Chen, Tsung-Kang & Liao, Hsien-Hsing, 2010. "Information uncertainty, information asymmetry and corporate bond yield spreads," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 2265-2279, September.
    7. Jiaqi Jiang & Yun Feng, 2021. "The interaction of risk management tools: Financial hedging, corporate diversification and liquidity," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 2396-2413, April.
    8. Tarun Chordia, 2005. "An Empirical Analysis of Stock and Bond Market Liquidity," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 18(1), pages 85-129.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caixe, Daniel Ferreira, 2022. "Corporate governance and investment sensitivity to policy uncertainty in Brazil," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(PB).
    2. Thierno Barry & Laetitia Lepetit & Frank Strobel & Thu Tran, 2020. "Examining the impact on risk when directors are related to minority shareholders in closely-held banks," Working Papers hal-02512450, HAL.
    3. Thierno Amadou Barry & Laetitia Lepetit & Frank Strobel & Thu Ha Tran, 2022. "Implications for Bank Risk when Directors are Related to Minority Shareholders," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 62(3), pages 233-265, December.
    4. Beltratti, Andrea & Paladino, Giovanna, 2013. "Why do banks optimize risk weights? The relevance of the cost of equity capital," MPRA Paper 46410, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Alam, Nurul & Boubaker, Sabri & Chen, Xiaomeng Charlene & Hasan, Mostafa Monzur, 2024. "Brand capital and debt choice," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    6. Le, Anh-Tuan & Doan, Anh-Tuan & Phan, Thu, 2021. "Institutional development and firm risk from a dynamic perspective: Does ownership structure matter?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 342-357.
    7. Shin Suke IKEDA, 2017. "Illiquidity in the Japan Electric Power Exchange," Discussion papers 17122, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    8. Chowdhury, Rajib & Doukas, John A. & Park, Jong Chool, 2021. "Stakeholder orientation and the value of cash holdings: Evidence from a natural experiment," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    9. Safiullah, Md & Shamsuddin, Abul, 2018. "Risk in Islamic banking and corporate governance," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 129-149.
    10. Al-Khouri, Ritab & Arouri, Houda, 2016. "The simultaneous estimation of credit growth, valuation, and stability of the Gulf Cooperation Council banking industry," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 499-518.
    11. Barsotti, Flavia & Viva, Luca Del, 2015. "Performance and determinants of the Merton structural model: Evidence from hedging coefficients," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 95-111.
    12. Galletta, Simona & Mazzù, Sebastiano & Scannella, Enzo, 2021. "Risk committee complexity and liquidity risk in the European banking industry," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 691-703.
    13. Waqas Haider & Fayaz Hussain Tunio & Muhammad Usman Arshad & Paulo Jorge Silveira Ferreira, 2025. "Nexus Between Corporate Sustainability Reporting and Risk Mitigation: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-32, February.
    14. Çolak, Gönül & Korkeamäki, Timo, 2021. "CEO mobility and corporate policy risk," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    15. Upreti, Vineet & Adams, Mike, 2015. "The strategic role of reinsurance in the United Kingdom’s (UK) non-life insurance market," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 206-219.
    16. Pham Tien Dat & Kim Quoc Trung Nguyen, 2023. "Foreign ownership and national governance quality affect liquidity risk – case in Vietnam," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 2244752-224, December.
    17. Marie-Ann Betschinger, 2015. "Do banks matter for the risk of a firm's investment portfolio? Evidence from foreign direct investment programs," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(8), pages 1264-1276, August.
    18. Dutra, Tiago M. & Teixeira, João C.A. & Dias, José Carlos, 2023. "Banking regulation and banks’ risk-taking behavior: The role of investors’ protection," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 124-148.
    19. Daniel Ştefan Armeanu & Georgeta Vintilă & Ştefan Cristian Gherghina, 2017. "Empirical Study towards the Drivers of Sustainable Economic Growth in EU-28 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, December.
    20. Cho, Seo-young & Vadlamannati, Krishna Chaitanya, 2010. "Compliance for big brothers: An empirical analysis on the impact of the anti-trafficking protocol," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 118, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:30-:d:1579247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.