IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v12y2024i12p327-d1532424.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation Metrics: A Critical Review

Author

Listed:
  • Lyubomir Todorov

    (Department of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Economic Accounting, “D. A. Tsenov” Academy of Economics, 5250 Svishtov, Bulgaria)

  • Margarita Shopova

    (Department of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Economic Accounting, “D. A. Tsenov” Academy of Economics, 5250 Svishtov, Bulgaria)

  • Iskra Marinova Panteleeva

    (Department of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Economic Accounting, “D. A. Tsenov” Academy of Economics, 5250 Svishtov, Bulgaria)

  • Lyubomira Todorova

    (Department of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Economic Accounting, “D. A. Tsenov” Academy of Economics, 5250 Svishtov, Bulgaria)

Abstract

Innovations are complex phenomena with important impacts on firms, regions, the economy as a whole, society, and the environment. Measuring innovation is a challenging and time-consuming task with many problems ranging from the conceptual framework to data collection and interpretation. The development of the produced variety of single indicators and multidimensional metrics covers one or more innovation characteristics—inputs, stages, sources, mechanics, outputs, and impacts. While the abundance of metrics allowed measurement of many innovation aspects, it also created problems with comparability, coverage, timeliness, and reliability, making it difficult for academics, businesses and policymakers to efficiently use the information, perform correct analysis and make adequate decisions. To address this problem, this article aimed to review the literature, develop instruments for the structuring and assessment of the innovation measurements, systematize the variety of metrics, and evaluate their compliance with the requirements of users’ needs and the quality of statistical information. The literature review identified 23 innovation metrics and helped create a classification scheme with 11 attributes and a criteria checklist with seven criteria groups. The results from the application of the instrument for the identified metrics revealed that they could be divided into three groups: appropriate, needing refinement, and unsuitable, with the best ones being the European Innovation Scoreboard and Global Innovation Index. They too showed some data gaps, connected with cultural environment, sustainability, open innovations, structural changes, and regional development, thus reinforcing the necessity for further advancement of theory and methodology for innovation measurement to augment the high-quality macro-information that is readily available with firm-level qualitative data of the innovation at the place where they emerge.

Suggested Citation

  • Lyubomir Todorov & Margarita Shopova & Iskra Marinova Panteleeva & Lyubomira Todorova, 2024. "Innovation Metrics: A Critical Review," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-28, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:12:y:2024:i:12:p:327-:d:1532424
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/12/12/327/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/12/12/327/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:12:y:2024:i:12:p:327-:d:1532424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.