IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v10y2022i8p185-d875511.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unravelling the Potential of Digital Servitization in Sustainability-Oriented Organizational Performance—Does Digital Leadership Make It Different?

Author

Listed:
  • Huy Quang Pham

    (School of Accounting, University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City (UEH), 59C Nguyen Dinh Chieu Street, District 3, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, Vietnam)

  • Phuc Kien Vu

    (School of Accounting, University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City (UEH), Vinh Long Campus, 1B Nguyen Trung Truc Street, Vinh Long 85000, Vietnam)

Abstract

This research proposed and enhanced a statistically reliable paradigm for determining the impacts of the role of digital servitization (DS) as a potential facilitator of sustainable and smart service innovation ecosystem (SSSIE) establishment and sustainability-oriented organizational performance (SOOP) improvement. Additionally, this research aimed to cast light on the role of digital leadership (DL) as a moderator of the hypothesized model. Structural equation modeling and multigroup analysis (MGA) were employed to process and analyze the data procured from a cross-sectional convenience sample of 412 respondents representing various public service sector organizations (PSSOs). The statistical outcomes corroborated that DS was positively and significantly correlated to SSSIE establishment, and at the same time, SOOP was significantly intensified by DS and SSSIE. Next, the nexus between DS and SOOP was enhanced when SSSIE was operationalized. Lastly, the MGA outcomes confirmed that all of the coefficients in the proposed model were statistically significantly different under the moderating effect of DL. These obtained findings could bring numerous valuable in-depth insights for practitioners and policymakers in digital initiatives management and governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Huy Quang Pham & Phuc Kien Vu, 2022. "Unravelling the Potential of Digital Servitization in Sustainability-Oriented Organizational Performance—Does Digital Leadership Make It Different?," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:10:y:2022:i:8:p:185-:d:875511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/10/8/185/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/10/8/185/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Graafland, J.J. & Eijffinger, S.C.W. & Smid, H., 2004. "Benchmarking of corporate social responsibility : Methodological problems and robustness," Other publications TiSEM 730f0e78-0c51-4c83-bbab-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Huang, Xiaobei “Beryl†& Watson, Luke, 2015. "Corporate social responsibility research in accounting," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 1-16.
    3. Kohtamäki, Marko & Parida, Vinit & Oghazi, Pejvak & Gebauer, Heiko & Baines, Tim, 2019. "Digital servitization business models in ecosystems: A theory of the firm," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 380-392.
    4. Eyad Al-Samman & Murad Mohammed Al-Nashmi, 2016. "Effect of corporate social responsibility on nonfinancial organizational performance: evidence from Yemeni for-profit public and private enterprises," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(2), pages 247-262, June.
    5. Ron Adner & Rahul Kapoor, 2010. "Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 306-333, March.
    6. Necmi K. Avkiran & Christian M. Ringle (ed.), 2018. "Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-3-319-71691-6, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leminen, Seppo & Rajahonka, Mervi & Wendelin, Robert & Westerlund, Mika & Nyström, Anna-Greta, 2022. "Autonomous vehicle solutions and their digital servitization business models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    2. Miehé, Lucas & Palmié, Maximilian & Oghazi, Pejvak, 2023. "Connection successfully established: How complementors use connectivity technologies to join existing ecosystems – Four archetype strategies from the mobility sector," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    3. Matzner, Martin & Pauli, Tobias & Marx, Emanuel & Anke, Jürgen & Poeppelbuss, Jens & Fielt, Erwin & Gregor, Shirley & Sun, Ruonan & Hydle, Katja Maria & Aas, Tor Helge & Aanestad, Margunn & Gordijn, J, 2021. "Transitioning to Platform-based Services and Business Models in a B2B Environment," SMR - Journal of Service Management Research, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 5(3), pages 143-162.
    4. Kamalaldin, Anmar & Sjödin, David & Hullova, Dusana & Parida, Vinit, 2021. "Configuring ecosystem strategies for digitally enabled process innovation: A framework for equipment suppliers in the process industries," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    5. Cuthbertson, Richard W. & Furseth, Peder Inge, 2022. "Digital services and competitive advantage: Strengthening the links between RBV, KBV, and innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 168-176.
    6. Scaliza, Janaina Aparecida Alves & Jugend, Daniel & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose & Latan, Hengky & Armellini, Fabiano & Twigg, David & Andrade, Darly Fernando, 2022. "Relationships among organizational culture, open innovation, innovative ecosystems, and performance of firms: Evidence from an emerging economy context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 264-279.
    7. Kolagar, Milad & Parida, Vinit & Sjödin, David, 2022. "Ecosystem transformation for digital servitization: A systematic review, integrative framework, and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 176-200.
    8. Münch, Christopher & Marx, Emanuel & Benz, Lukas & Hartmann, Evi & Matzner, Martin, 2022. "Capabilities of digital servitization: Evidence from the socio-technical systems theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    9. Freije, Inmaculada & de la Calle, Alberto & Ugarte, José V., 2022. "Role of supply chain integration in the product innovation capability of servitized manufacturing companies," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    10. Nicolae Nae & Simona Catalina ?tefan & Catalina Florentina Albu, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility'S Pathways Towards Customer Loyalty In Romanian Retail: A Pls-Sem Mediation Analysis," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(3), pages 99-118, September.
    11. Palmié, Maximilian & Miehé, Lucas & Oghazi, Pejvak & Parida, Vinit & Wincent, Joakim, 2022. "The evolution of the digital service ecosystem and digital business model innovation in retail: The emergence of meta-ecosystems and the value of physical interactions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    12. Al-Baraa Abdulrahman Al-Mekhlafi & Ahmad Shahrul Nizam Isha & Nicholas Chileshe & Mohammed Abdulrab & Anwar Ameen Hezam Saeed & Ahmed Farouk Kineber, 2021. "Modelling the Relationship between the Nature of Work Factors and Driving Performance Mediating by Role of Fatigue," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-17, June.
    13. Baldwin, Carliss Y. & Bogers, Marcel L.A.M. & Kapoor, Rahul & West, Joel, 2024. "Focusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    14. Delin Zeng & Jingbo Hu & Taohua Ouyang, 2017. "Managing Innovation Paradox in the Sustainable Innovation Ecosystem: A Case Study of Ambidextrous Capability in a Focal Firm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, November.
    15. Yi Mei & Xiaoyan Xu & Xiaodong Li, 2020. "Encouraging Patient Engagement Behaviors from the Perspective of Functional Quality," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-15, November.
    16. Kathryn Rudie Harrigan & Maria Chiara Guardo & Bo Cowgill, 2017. "Multiplicative-innovation synergies: tests in technological acquisitions," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(5), pages 1212-1233, October.
    17. Elizabeth J. Altman & Frank Nagle & Michael L. Tushman, 2013. "Innovating Without Information Constraints: Organizations, Communities, and Innovation When Information Costs Approach Zero," Harvard Business School Working Papers 14-043, Harvard Business School, revised Sep 2014.
    18. Adilson Carlos Yoshikuni & José Eduardo Ricciardi Favaretto & Alberto Luiz Albertin & Fernando de Souza Meirelles, 2022. "How can Strategy-as-Practice Enable Innovation under the Influence of Environmental Dynamism?," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 26(1), pages 200131-2001.
    19. Younès El Manzani & Mohamed Larbi Sidmou & Jean-Jack Cegarra, 2018. "Does IS0 9001 quality management system support product innovation? An analysis from the sociotechnical systems theory," Post-Print hal-03080217, HAL.
    20. Juan E. Núñez-Ríos & Jacqueline Y. Sánchez-García & Omar G. Rojas & Elias Olivares-Benitez, 2020. "Factors to Foster Organizational Sustainability in Tourism SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-21, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:10:y:2022:i:8:p:185-:d:875511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.