IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v8y2018i11p166-d177545.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship of Salinity Tolerance to Na + Exclusion, Proline Accumulation, and Antioxidant Enzyme Activity in Rice Seedlings

Author

Listed:
  • Maha Nagy Abdelaziz

    (Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation (IDEC), Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8529, Japan
    The authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Tran Dang Xuan

    (Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation (IDEC), Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8529, Japan)

  • Ahmad Mohammad M. Mekawy

    (Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8528, Japan
    Department of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Minia University, El-Minia 61519, Egypt
    The authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Hongliang Wang

    (Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation (IDEC), Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8529, Japan)

  • Tran Dang Khanh

    (Agricultural Genetics Institute, Pham Van Dong Street, Hanoi 123000, Vietnam)

Abstract

Rice is a staple crop for over 50% of the world’s population, but its sensitivity to salinity poses a threat to meeting the worldwide demand. This study investigated the correlation of salinity tolerance to Na + exclusion, proline accumulation, and the activity of antioxidant enzymes in some rice cultivars originating from Egypt. Giza 182 was shown to be the most tolerant of the five cultivars, as judged by visual symptoms of salt injury, growth parameters, and patterns of Na + accumulation, while Sakha 105 appeared to be highly susceptible. In detail, Giza 182 accumulated the lowest Na + concentration and maintained a much lower Na + /K + ratio in all plant organs in comparison to Sakha 105. The salinity-tolerant varieties had higher accumulation of proline than the salinity-susceptible cultivars. The salinity-tolerant Giza 182 accumulated a higher concentration of proline, but the lipid peroxidation (MDA) level was significantly reduced compared to in the salinity-susceptible Sakha 105. In addition, Giza 182 had stronger activity of both catalase (CAT) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) compared to Sakha 105. The findings of this study reveal that the salinity tolerance in rice is primarily attributable to Na + exclusion, the accumulation of proline in rice organs, a low Na + /K + ratio, and a low level of lipid peroxidation. The levels of the antioxidant enzymes CAT and APX and the accumulation of proline may play important roles in salinity tolerance in rice. However, the comparative involvement of individual antioxidant enzymes in salinity stress in rice should be further investigated. Giza 182 has the potential to be cultivated in salinity-affected areas, although the effects of salinity stress on its grain yield and quality should be evaluated during the full crop cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Maha Nagy Abdelaziz & Tran Dang Xuan & Ahmad Mohammad M. Mekawy & Hongliang Wang & Tran Dang Khanh, 2018. "Relationship of Salinity Tolerance to Na + Exclusion, Proline Accumulation, and Antioxidant Enzyme Activity in Rice Seedlings," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-12, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:8:y:2018:i:11:p:166-:d:177545
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/8/11/166/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/8/11/166/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abhishek Singh & Rakesh Singh Sengar & Vishnu D. Rajput & Tatiana Minkina & Rupesh Kumar Singh, 2022. "Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Improve Salt Tolerance in Rice Seedlings by Improving Physiological and Biochemical Indices," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:8:y:2018:i:11:p:166-:d:177545. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.