IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i5p445-d1595399.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Weighted Kernel Ridge Regression to Improve Genomic Prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Chenguang Diao

    (State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding (MOE), College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Yue Zhuo

    (State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding (MOE), College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Ruihan Mao

    (State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding (MOE), College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Weining Li

    (State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding (MOE), College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Heng Du

    (State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding (MOE), College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Lei Zhou

    (State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding (MOE), College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Jianfeng Liu

    (State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding (MOE), College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

Abstract

Nonparametric models have recently been receiving increased attention due to their effectiveness in genomic prediction for complex traits. However, regular nonparametric models cannot effectively differentiate the relative importance of various SNPs, which significantly impedes the further application of these methods for genomic prediction. To enhance the fitting ability of nonparametric models and improve genomic prediction accuracy, a weighted kernel ridge regression model (WKRR) was proposed in this study. For this new method, different weights were assigned to different SNPs according to the p -values from GWAS, and then a KRR model based on these weighted SNPs was constructed for genomic prediction. Cross-validation was further adopted to choose appropriate hyper-parameters during the weighting and prediction process for generalization. We compared the predictive accuracy of WKRR with the genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), BayesR, and unweighted KRR using both simulated and real datasets. The results showed that WKRR outperformed unweighted KRR in all simulated scenarios. Additionally, WKRR achieved an average improvement of 1.70% in accuracies across all traits in a mice dataset and 2.17% for three lactation-related traits in a cattle dataset compared to GBLUP, and yielded competitive results compared to BayesR. These findings demonstrated the great potential of weighted nonparametric models for genomic prediction.

Suggested Citation

  • Chenguang Diao & Yue Zhuo & Ruihan Mao & Weining Li & Heng Du & Lei Zhou & Jianfeng Liu, 2025. "Weighted Kernel Ridge Regression to Improve Genomic Prediction," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-13, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:5:p:445-:d:1595399
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/5/445/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/5/445/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerhard Moser & Sang Hong Lee & Ben J Hayes & Michael E Goddard & Naomi R Wray & Peter M Visscher, 2015. "Simultaneous Discovery, Estimation and Prediction Analysis of Complex Traits Using a Bayesian Mixture Model," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carla Márquez-Luna & Steven Gazal & Po-Ru Loh & Samuel S. Kim & Nicholas Furlotte & Adam Auton & Alkes L. Price, 2021. "Incorporating functional priors improves polygenic prediction accuracy in UK Biobank and 23andMe data sets," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Ganwen Zhang & Jianini Zhao & Jieru Wang & Guo Lin & Lin Li & Fengfei Ban & Meiting Zhu & Yangjun Wen & Jin Zhang, 2024. "An Improved Expectation–Maximization Bayesian Algorithm for GWAS," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-14, June.
    3. M. S. Clark & J. I. Hoffman & L. S. Peck & L. Bargelloni & D. Gande & C. Havermans & B. Meyer & T. Patarnello & T. Phillips & K. R. Stoof-Leichsenring & D. L. J. Vendrami & A. Beck & G. Collins & M. W, 2023. "Multi-omics for studying and understanding polar life," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Theo Meuwissen & Ben Hayes & Iona MacLeod & Michael Goddard, 2022. "Identification of Genomic Variants Causing Variation in Quantitative Traits: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-11, October.
    5. Ye, Mao & Zhang, Peng & Nie, Lizhen, 2018. "Clustering sparse binary data with hierarchical Bayesian Bernoulli mixture model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 32-49.
    6. Cox Lwaka Tamba & Yuan-Li Ni & Yuan-Ming Zhang, 2017. "Iterative sure independence screening EM-Bayesian LASSO algorithm for multi-locus genome-wide association studies," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, January.
    7. Gao Wang & Abhishek Sarkar & Peter Carbonetto & Matthew Stephens, 2020. "A simple new approach to variable selection in regression, with application to genetic fine mapping," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 82(5), pages 1273-1300, December.
    8. Malka Gorfine & Sonja I Berndt & Jenny Chang-Claude & Michael Hoffmeister & Loic Le Marchand & John Potter & Martha L Slattery & Nir Keret & Ulrike Peters & Li Hsu, 2017. "Heritability Estimation using a Regularized Regression Approach (HERRA): Applicable to continuous, dichotomous or age-at-onset outcome," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, August.
    9. Marion Patxot & Daniel Trejo Banos & Athanasios Kousathanas & Etienne J. Orliac & Sven E. Ojavee & Gerhard Moser & Alexander Holloway & Julia Sidorenko & Zoltan Kutalik & Reedik Mägi & Peter M. Vissch, 2021. "Probabilistic inference of the genetic architecture underlying functional enrichment of complex traits," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Katharina B Böndel & Susanne A Kraemer & Toby Samuels & Deirdre McClean & Josianne Lachapelle & Rob W Ness & Nick Colegrave & Peter D Keightley, 2019. "Inferring the distribution of fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-24, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:5:p:445-:d:1595399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.