IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i3p249-d1575843.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key Performance Indicators as Predictors of Enterprise Gross Margin in English and Welsh Suckler Beef and Sheep Farms

Author

Listed:
  • Nia Lloyd

    (Department of Life Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth SY23 3DA, UK)

  • Manod Williams

    (Department of Life Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth SY23 3DA, UK)

  • Hefin Wyn Williams

    (Department of Life Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth SY23 3DA, UK)

Abstract

A large proportion of the lowest annual farm profits in the United Kingdom in recent years comes from lowland and Less Favoured Area (LFA) beef and sheep farms. Benchmarking the performance of a business through routine data collection can provide the information needed to make changes to enterprise management and performance. Key performance indicators (KPIs) are globally recognised measures that can provide farmers with this capability. However, it is largely unknown if there are specific KPIs relating to livestock production that have a significant effect on financial performance. The aim of this study was to determine whether KPIs could be used as predictors of financial performance (gross margin, GM), on suckler beef and sheep farms in England and Wales. This was completed using data from the Farm Business Survey (FBS), which is the largest stratified financial survey of its kind in the UK. Following data extraction, multiple linear regression models were developed for four enterprise types: LFA suckler beef, lowland suckler beef, LFA ewe and lowland ewe. Several KPIs were significantly associated with gross margin per head in all enterprise types. KPIs that were positively associated with GM were measures of livestock productivity, which were lambs per breeding stock and calves per cow. The increased expenditure on concentrate feed had a significantly negative association within all enterprise types, except for LFA suckler beef enterprises, where cow mortality had the greatest significantly negative association. This is the first study to demonstrate the influence livestock production KPIs have on the financial performance of suckler beef and sheep enterprises in both England and Wales, highlighting the importance of routine data collection and benchmarking.

Suggested Citation

  • Nia Lloyd & Manod Williams & Hefin Wyn Williams, 2025. "Key Performance Indicators as Predictors of Enterprise Gross Margin in English and Welsh Suckler Beef and Sheep Farms," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-10, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:249-:d:1575843
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/3/249/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/3/249/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alejandra Gonzalez-Mejia & David Styles & Paul Wilson & James Gibbons, 2018. "Metrics and methods for characterizing dairy farm intensification using farm survey data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Noah J Miller & Jason S Bergtold & Allen M Featherstone, 2019. "Economic elasticities of input substitution using data envelopment analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Elizabeth Ahikiriza & Joshua Wesana & Xavier Gellynck & Guido Van Huylenbroeck & Ludwig Lauwers, 2021. "Context Specificity and Time Dependency in Classifying Sub-Saharan Africa Dairy Cattle Farmers for Targeted Extension Farm Advice: The Case of Uganda," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Georgia Koutouzidou & Athanasios Ragkos & Katerina Melfou, 2022. "Evolution of the Structure and Economic Management of the Dairy Cow Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-12, September.
    4. Alba Vázquez-López & Martín Barrasa-Rioja & Manuel Marey-Perez, 2021. "ICT in Rural Areas from the Perspective of Dairy Farming: A Systematic Review," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Jan Van der Lee & Laurens Klerkx & Bockline Omedo Bebe & Ashenafi Mengistu & Simon Oosting, 2018. "Intensification and Upgrading Dynamics in Emerging Dairy Clusters in the East African Highlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-24, November.
    6. Rūta Savickienė & Aistė Galnaitytė, 2024. "Unveiling Determinants of Successful Dairy Farm Performance from Dairy Exporting EU Countries," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, July.
    7. Zehetmeier, M. & Läpple, D. & Hoffmann, H. & Zerhusen, B. & Strobl, M. & Meyer-Aurich, A. & Kapfer, M., 2020. "Is there a joint lever? Identifying and ranking factors that determine GHG emissions and profitability on dairy farms in Bavaria, Germany," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    8. Alba Vázquez-López & Manuel Marey-Perez, 2021. "Factors Affecting e-Government Adoption by Dairy Farmers: A Case Study in the North-West of Spain," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, August.
    9. Karlsson, Johan O. & Robling, Helena & Cederberg, Christel & Spörndly, Rolf & Lindberg, Mikaela & Martiin, Carin & Ardfors, Elsa & Tidåker, Pernilla, 2023. "What can we learn from the past? Tracking sustainability indicators for the Swedish dairy sector over 30 years," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:249-:d:1575843. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.