IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i9p1603-d1477888.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Current Framework of Italian Agriculture and Changes between the 2010 and 2020 Censuses

Author

Listed:
  • Luca Altamore

    (Department of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Sciences, Università Degli Studi di Palermo, 90123 Palermo, Italy)

  • Pietro Chinnici

    (Department of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Sciences, Università Degli Studi di Palermo, 90123 Palermo, Italy)

  • Simona Bacarella

    (Department of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Sciences, Università Degli Studi di Palermo, 90123 Palermo, Italy)

  • Stefania Chironi

    (Department of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Sciences, Università Degli Studi di Palermo, 90123 Palermo, Italy)

  • Marzia Ingrassia

    (Department of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Sciences, Università Degli Studi di Palermo, 90123 Palermo, Italy)

Abstract

This study aims to describe the current framework of the Italian agricultural sector and the changes that occurred in the decade between the two general censuses of agriculture of 2010 and 2020, and the EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) programming period 2014–2020. The General Census of Agriculture is an economic census carried out to fulfill international and EU legislation requirements, but also to meet national information needs. It consists in counting farms and identifying their characteristics. For this study, the official data of the 7th Italian General Census of Agriculture (GCA) of 2020 were collected, analyzed, and compared to those of the previous 6th GCA of 2010. Farms’ type of activities, structure, digitalization/computerization, innovation, and workforces’ characteristics were analyzed. Correlations between farms with investments in innovation and other variables like the age and the educational qualification of entrepreneurs and the farm’s size (agricultural used area) were calculated. Groups of similar Italian regions for types of farm and types of farming (segmenting the sector into subsets of regions that share common characteristics), and groups of similar farming characteristics in the entire agricultural sector, were highlighted. The results showed a notable positive correlation between farms’ investment in innovation and farms’ size, and a medium but positive correlation also with other two variables, the entrepreneur’s range of age and educational qualification. Results found groups of regions that are similar in terms of types of farm and farming types, highlighting that the agricultural sector in Italy is not homogeneous among all the regions of north, center, and south. Moreover, the discovered different groups of farming characteristics highlighted the Italian “farm profiles”, i.e., descriptions of key information about different specific types of farm. The overall analysis of all the results of this study provided the current situation of the Italian agricultural sector and discussion about its characteristics and changes during the last ten years. Based on our knowledge, this study is the first one with such a level of comprehensiveness. Findings are of high interest to academics in agriculture economics and policy maker, because they contribute to identifying the farms’ and territories’ strategic elements that require strengthening to foster economic and social development. Moreover these findings may provide food for thought on the effectiveness of the development strategy of the EU CAP 2023–2027 (through greening and digitization) at the regional and European levels, starting from the baseline situation of this country, which is certainly one, but which is among the most relevant ones in the European agri-food system and also globally.

Suggested Citation

  • Luca Altamore & Pietro Chinnici & Simona Bacarella & Stefania Chironi & Marzia Ingrassia, 2024. "Current Framework of Italian Agriculture and Changes between the 2010 and 2020 Censuses," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-37, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:9:p:1603-:d:1477888
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/9/1603/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/9/1603/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodríguez del Valle, Adrián & Fernández-Vázquez, Esteban, 2024. "Analyzing market power of the agricultural industry in Asia," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 652-669.
    2. Renata Yanbykh & Valeriy Saraikin & Zvi Lerman, 2020. "Changes in Russia's agrarian structure: What can we learn from agricultural census?," Russian Journal of Economics, ARPHA Platform, vol. 6(1), pages 26-41, March.
    3. Coderoni, Silvia & Cardillo, Concetta & Macrì, Maria Carmela & Perito, Maria Angela, 2018. "Farms Employing Foreign Workers in Italy: An Analysis with Census Micro Data," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 67(3), September.
    4. Rosa Maria Fanelli, 2023. "Barriers and Drivers Underpinning Newcomers in Agriculture: Evidence from Italian Census Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Christiaensen, Luc & Rutledge, Zachariah & Taylor, J. Edward, 2020. "The Future of Work in Agriculture - Some Reflections," Jobs Group Papers, Notes, and Guides 32012537, The World Bank.
    6. Concetta Cardillo & Orlando Cimino & Marcello De Rosa & Martina Francescone, 2023. "The Evolution of Multifunctional Agriculture in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Francesco Licciardo & Roberto Henke & Francesco Piras & Barbara Zanetti, 2024. "The Setting-Up Measure to Support Generational Renewal in Agriculture: The Italian Experience," World, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-18, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khan, Syed Abdul Rehman & Razzaq, Asif & Yu, Zhang & Shah, Adeel & Sharif, Arshian & Janjua, Laeeq, 2022. "Disruption in food supply chain and undernourishment challenges: An empirical study in the context of Asian countries," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    2. Berna Türkekul & Canan Fisun Abay, 2024. "Understanding Why Farmers Leave: Validating Key Indicators for Farm Exit in İzmir, Türkiye," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Cristina Pavanello & Marcello Franchini & Stefano Bovolenta & Elisa Marraccini & Mirco Corazzin, 2024. "Sustainability Indicators for Dairy Cattle Farms in European Union Countries: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-25, May.
    4. Concetta Cardillo & Luca Bartoli & Marcello De Rosa & Martina Francescone & Margherita Masi & Hanae Sahir & Yari Vecchio, 2024. "Exploring Diversification Strategies among Italian Farms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-13, October.
    5. Petrick, Martin, 2021. "Post-Soviet agricultural restructuring: A success story after all?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 63(4), pages 623-647.
    6. Song, Bingjie & Robinson, Guy M. & Bardsley, Douglas K. & Xue, Yanlong & Wang, Bing, 2023. "Multifunctional agriculture in a peri-urban fringe: Chinese farmers’ responses to shifts in policy and changing socio-economic conditions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    7. Dario Macaluso & Francesco Licciardo & Katya Carbone, 2024. "Farming of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants in Italy: Structural Features and Economic Results," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, January.
    8. Cock, James & Prager, Steven & Meinke, Holger & Echeverria, Ruben, 2022. "Labour productivity: The forgotten yield gap," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    9. Abdulazeez Hudu Wudil & Asghar Ali & Khalid Mushtaq & Sajjad Ahmad Baig & Magdalena Radulescu & Piotr Prus & Muhammad Usman & László Vasa, 2023. "Water Use Efficiency and Productivity of Irrigated Rice Cultivation in Nigeria: An Application of the Stochastic Frontier Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, May.
    10. Bhim Reddy & Ranjit Prakash & Busam Monika Reddy, 2021. "Dynamics of Agricultural Labour in Small-Farm Economy: Work, Gender and Technologies in Cotton Production in Telangana," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 64(1), pages 49-71, March.
    11. Julia Doitchinova & Zornitsa Stoyanova, 2024. "Regional Aspects of Transformations in Agriculture: The Case of the Republic of Bulgaria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Adzigbli, Wonder Kofi & Duku, Eric & Atampugre, Gerald & Fürst, Christine & Nyarko, Benjamin Kofi, 2024. "Agricultural land use policies and landscape dynamics: Evidence from rainforest agroecological zone," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    13. Wang, Xu & Wen, Ziyu & He, Lingyun & Zheng, Haoyang & Yang, Tengfei & Long, Ruyin, 2024. "The role of imperfect market structure in the employment effect of emissions trading scheme in China: A theoretical extension and empirical investigation," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 920-937.
    14. Maria Ragosta & Giada Daniele & Vito Imbrenda & Rosa Coluzzi & Mariagrazia D’Emilio & Maria Lanfredi & Nadia Matarazzo, 2024. "Land Transformations in Irpinia (Southern Italy): A Tale on the Socio-Economic Dynamics Acting in a Marginal Area of the Mediterranean Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-20, October.
    15. Louisa Prause, 2021. "Digital Agriculture and Labor: A Few Challenges for Social Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, May.
    16. Diane Charlton & J. Edward Taylor, 2020. "Rural school access and the agricultural transformation," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(5), pages 641-654, September.
    17. Marie Christelle Mabeu & Roland Pongou, 2021. "The Interplay Between Colonial History and Postcolonial Institutions: Evidence from Cameroon," Working Papers 2111E Classification-D02,, University of Ottawa, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:9:p:1603-:d:1477888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.