IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i8p1362-d1456412.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Productivity and Vigor Dynamics in a Comparative Trial of Hedgerow Olive Cultivars

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Manuel Pérez-Rodríguez

    (Centro de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas de Extremadura (CICYTEX), 06187 Guadajira, Spain)

  • Raúl De la Rosa

    (Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Avda. Menéndez Pidal s/n, 14004 Córdoba, Spain)

  • Lorenzo León

    (Centro IFAPA “Alameda del Obispo”, Avda. Menéndez Pidal s/n, 14004 Córdoba, Spain)

  • Encarnación Lara

    (Centro de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas de Extremadura (CICYTEX), 06187 Guadajira, Spain)

  • Henar Prieto

    (Centro de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas de Extremadura (CICYTEX), 06187 Guadajira, Spain)

Abstract

The hedgerow growing system is prevalent in new olive orchards worldwide due to its fully mechanized harvesting. Several works have been published to compare cultivars planted in this system, focusing on productivity and oil composition. However, little research has been conducted on the long-term evaluation of cultivars’ growth habits when trained in hedgerow systems and on how it affects their interannual productivity. In this work, we report the canopy growth habit, productivity, and their correlation for the ‘Arbequina’, ‘Arbosana’, ‘Koroneiki’, ‘Lecciana’, ‘Oliana’, and ‘Sikitita’ cultivars grown in a hedgerow system in Extremadura, central-western Spain, for 9 years. ‘Koroneiki’, ‘Arbequina’, and ‘Lecciana’ were the cultivars with the highest canopy growth, both in young and adult trees, and the ones with the highest pruning needs from 5 to 10 years after planting. The yield behavior in each of the years evaluated was stable in all cultivars except ‘Lecciana’. This alternate bearing was associated with the distribution of total yearly produced biomass between fruits and vegetative growth. ‘Oliana’, ‘Arbosana’, and ‘Sikitita’ were the cultivars with the highest proportion of fruit of the total biomass, and ‘Lecciana’ showed the lowest. This study indicates that cultivars with higher fruit proportions of total biomass might have better suitability for long-term growing in hedgerow formation, fewer pruning needs, and more stable productivity across the years. In this sense, in the climatic conditions considered here, ‘Arbosana’, ‘Sikitita’, and ‘Oliana’ could be the most suitable cultivars for this growing system.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Manuel Pérez-Rodríguez & Raúl De la Rosa & Lorenzo León & Encarnación Lara & Henar Prieto, 2024. "Productivity and Vigor Dynamics in a Comparative Trial of Hedgerow Olive Cultivars," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-11, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:1362-:d:1456412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/8/1362/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/8/1362/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Enrico Maria Lodolini & Alberto de Iudicibus & Pompea Gabriella Lucchese & Giuseppina Las Casas & Biagio Torrisi & Elisabetta Nicolosi & Alessio Giuffrida & Filippo Ferlito, 2023. "Comparison of Canopy Architecture of Five Olive Cultivars in a High-Density Planting System in Sicily," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:1362-:d:1456412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.