IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i8p1338-d1453930.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Regional Potentials of Agricultural E-Commerce Development Using a Novel MEREC Heronian-CoCoSo Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Shupeng Huang

    (Logistics Management Department, College of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Hong Cheng

    (Logistics Management Department, College of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Manyi Tan

    (Logistics Management Department, College of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Zhiqing Tang

    (Logistics Management Department, College of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Chuyi Teng

    (Logistics Management Department, College of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

Abstract

In terms of both economy and sustainability, rural areas can greatly benefit from adopting E-commerce. The Chinese government is currently devoting significant efforts to developing agricultural E-commerce. However, one of the most significant problems is the lack of effective tools for evaluating regional potentials in this regard, possibly leading to inappropriate policymaking, investment allocation, and regional planning. To address this issue, this study proposes a novel and effective method for evaluating regional potentials for agricultural E-commerce development, integrating the method based on the removal effects of criteria (MEREC), Heronian mean operator, and combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method. The method’s effectiveness is then tested and confirmed in the Chinese city of Yibin through an evaluation of its ten regions. The results suggest that such a method is robust, objective, and able to consider indicator interactions effectively. By applying this method, regional agricultural E-commerce development potentials can be thoroughly evaluated and ranked. This study contributes to the literature by providing new analytical techniques for agricultural studies, as well as by supporting political and investment decision-making for governments and E-commerce practitioners in the agriculture sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Shupeng Huang & Hong Cheng & Manyi Tan & Zhiqing Tang & Chuyi Teng, 2024. "Evaluating Regional Potentials of Agricultural E-Commerce Development Using a Novel MEREC Heronian-CoCoSo Approach," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:1338-:d:1453930
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/8/1338/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/8/1338/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Changhong Chen & Huijie Zhang, 2023. "Evaluation of Green Development Level of Mianyang Agriculture, Based on the Entropy Weight Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Rainer Alt, 2017. "Electronic markets on transaction costs," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 27(4), pages 297-301, November.
    3. Shiwei Liu & Pingyu Zhang & Ben Marley & Wenxin Liu, 2019. "The Factors Affecting Farmers’ Soybean Planting Behavior in Heilongjiang Province, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-13, September.
    4. Fecke, Wilm & Danne, Michael & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2018. "E-commerce in agriculture: The case of crop protection product purchases in a discrete choice experiment," DARE Discussion Papers 1803, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    5. Morteza Yazdani & Pascale Zaraté & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Zenonas Turskis, 2019. "A Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems," Post-Print hal-02879091, HAL.
    6. Yu, Yang & Wu, Shibo & Yu, Jianxing & Xu, Ya & Song, Lin & Xu, Weipeng, 2022. "A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making framework for offshore wind turbine selection: A case study in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    7. Xiaoxia Li, 2022. "Research on the Development Level of Rural E-Commerce in China Based on Analytic Hierarchy and Systematic Clustering Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Xia & Xu, Li & Cai, Jingjing & Peng, Cheng & Bian, Xiaoyan, 2024. "Offshore wind turbine selection with multi-criteria decision-making techniques involving D numbers and squeeze adversarial interpretive structural modeling method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 368(C).
    2. Tajana Čop & Mario Njavro, 2022. "Application of Discrete Choice Experiment in Agricultural Risk Management: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Pinitjitsamut, Montchai, 2023. "The Economic Impacts of Electronic Transaction Development in Thailand," MPRA Paper 116867, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Su, Dan & Zhang, Lijun & Peng, Hua & Saeidi, Parvaneh & Tirkolaee, Erfan Babaee, 2023. "Technical challenges of blockchain technology for sustainable manufacturing paradigm in Industry 4.0 era using a fuzzy decision support system," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    5. Tianli Wang & Yanji Ma & Siqi Luo, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Soybean Production in Heilongjiang Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-29, November.
    6. Hosseini Dehshiri, Seyyed Jalaladdin & Amiri, Maghsoud, 2023. "Evaluating the risks of the internet of things in renewable energy systems using a hybrid fuzzy decision approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    7. Beibei Yan & Tianjun Liu, 2022. "Can E-Commerce Adoption Improve Agricultural Productivity? Evidence from Apple Growers in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Hosseini Dehshiri, Seyyed Jalaladdin & Amiri, Maghsoud & Hosseini Bamakan, Seyed Mojtaba, 2024. "Evaluating the blockchain technology strategies for reducing renewable energy development risks using a novel integrated decision framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    9. Feng Zhou & Chunhui Wen, 2023. "Research on the Level of Agricultural Green Development, Regional Disparities, and Dynamic Distribution Evolution in China from the Perspective of Sustainable Development," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-47, July.
    10. Sun, Yanwei & Ai, Hongying & Li, Ying & Wang, Run & Ma, Renfeng, 2024. "Data-driven large-scale spatial planning framework for determining size and location of offshore wind energy development: A case study of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 367(C).
    11. Zhi Wen & Huchang Liao & Ruxue Ren & Chunguang Bai & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Jurgita Antucheviciene & Abdullah Al-Barakati, 2019. "Cold Chain Logistics Management of Medicine with an Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-21, December.
    12. Mehmet Ozcalici, 2023. "Integrating queue theory and multi-criteria decision-making tools for selecting roll-over car washing machine," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 33(2), pages 99-119.
    13. Elisa Giampietri & Samuele Trestini, 2020. "Analysing farmers' intention to adopt web marketing under a technology-organisation-environment perspective: A case study in Italy," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(5), pages 226-233.
    14. Željko Stević & Dillip Kumar Das & Rade Tešić & Marijo Vidas & Dragan Vojinović, 2022. "Objective Criticism and Negative Conclusions on Using the Fuzzy SWARA Method in Multi-Criteria Decision Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, February.
    15. Sood, Kirti & Singh, Simarjeet & Behl, Abhishek & Sindhwani, Rahul & Kaur, Sandeepa & Pereira, Vijay, 2023. "Identification and prioritization of the risks in the mass adoption of artificial intelligence-driven stable coins: The quest for optimal resource utilization," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    16. Xinyi Liu & Huixian Jiang, 2023. "Dynamic Evaluation of Ecological Environment Quality in Coastal Cities from the Perspective of Water Quality: The Case of Fuzhou City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, July.
    17. Fang Sun & Jia Li, 2022. "Research on the Development Mechanism of Rural E-Commerce Based on Rooted Theory: A Co-Benefit-Oriented Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    18. Raghunathan Krishankumar & Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Pratibha Rani & Fausto Cavallaro & Kattur Soundarapandian Ravichandran, 2023. "A Novel Integrated q-Rung Fuzzy Framework for Biomass Location Selection with No Apriori Weight Choices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    19. Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Pratibha Rani & Raghunathan Krishankumar & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Kattur S. Ravichandran, 2021. "A Hesitant Fuzzy Combined Compromise Solution Framework-Based on Discrimination Measure for Ranking Sustainable Third-Party Reverse Logistic Providers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    20. Cui, Yongfeng & Liu, Wei & Rani, Pratibha & Alrasheedi, Melfi, 2021. "Internet of Things (IoT) adoption barriers for the circular economy using Pythagorean fuzzy SWARA-CoCoSo decision-making approach in the manufacturing sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:1338-:d:1453930. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.