IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i7p1173-d1437533.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Realizing the Potential of Eastern Uganda’s Smallholder Dairy Sector through Participatory Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Sushil Paudyal

    (Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

Abstract

This study explored smallholder dairy production and cattle welfare in Eastern Uganda using mixed methods evaluation approaches. A focus group of 17 members performed a SWOT analysis of local farms, identifying strengths like available land, forage, and community support but weaknesses including disease, parasites, and lack of technologies. Field assessments of 12 farms using a modified Welfare Quality ® protocol revealed 25% had inadequate body condition; 33% lacked adequate water access; 50% provided comfortable housing; and 42% had animals with health issues. Six recommendations were formulated to address needs via training, veterinary services access, data systems, finance, milk market development, and pasture improvements. Though struggling with resource constraints and animal health, eastern Uganda’s favorable climate and community present opportunities to enhance productivity and welfare with targeted actions like skills development and access to technologies. However, external inputs require alignment with smallholder realities. Findings detail current conditions while highlighting local perspectives to guide appropriate innovations sensitive to economic limitations and values-based motives. Collaborating with producers to incrementally elevate management can improve livelihoods and animal well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Sushil Paudyal, 2024. "Realizing the Potential of Eastern Uganda’s Smallholder Dairy Sector through Participatory Evaluation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-12, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:7:p:1173-:d:1437533
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/7/1173/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/7/1173/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrea Cornwall & Garett Pratt, 2011. "The use and abuse of participatory rural appraisal: reflections from practice," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 28(2), pages 263-272, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barrett, T. & Feola, G. & Krylova, V. & Khusnitdinova, M., 2017. "The application of Rapid Appraisal of Agricultural Innovation Systems (RAAIS) to agricultural adaptation to climate change in Kazakhstan: A critical evaluation," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 106-113.
    2. Colleen M. Eidt & Laxmi P. Pant & Gordon M. Hickey, 2020. "Platform, Participation, and Power: How Dominant and Minority Stakeholders Shape Agricultural Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Belcher, Brian & Achdiawan, Ramadhani & Dewi, Sonya, 2015. "Forest-Based Livelihoods Strategies Conditioned by Market Remoteness and Forest Proximity in Jharkhand, India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 269-279.
    4. Paul Alexander Haslam, 2020. "Bigger Data and Quantitative Methods in the Study of Socio-Environmental Conflicts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-12, September.
    5. Jianwu Qi & Wei Li & Zongxiang Wang & Haozhou Fang, 2021. "Measurement and Path Selection of Rural Development Level in Enclave Areas: A Case Study of Jingyuan County, Gansu Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-26, September.
    6. Sonja Kaufmann & Nikolaus Hruschka & Christian R. Vogl, 2020. "Bridging the Literature Gap: A Framework for Assessing Actor Participation in Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-26, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:7:p:1173-:d:1437533. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.