IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i3p455-d1354840.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Genomic Prediction for Inbred and Hybrid Polysomic Tetraploid Potato Offspring

Author

Listed:
  • Rodomiro Ortiz

    (Department of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), P.O. Box 190, SE 23436 Lomma, Sweden)

  • Fredrik Reslow

    (Department of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), P.O. Box 190, SE 23436 Lomma, Sweden)

  • Ramesh Vetukuri

    (Department of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), P.O. Box 190, SE 23436 Lomma, Sweden)

  • M. Rosario García-Gil

    (Umeå Plant Science Center, SLU Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, SE 90183 Umeå, Sweden)

  • Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez

    (Colegio de Postgraduados (COLPOS), Montecillos 56230, Edo. de México, Mexico)

  • José Crossa

    (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Carretera México-Veracruz Km. 45, El Batán, Texcoco 56237, Edo. de México, Mexico)

Abstract

Potato genetic improvement begins with crossing cultivars or breeding clones which often have complementary characteristics for producing heritable variation in segregating offspring, in which phenotypic selection is used thereafter across various vegetative generations (T i ). The aim of this research was to determine whether tetrasomic genomic best linear unbiased predictors (GBLUPs) may facilitate selecting for tuber yield across early T i within and across breeding sites in inbred (S 1 ) and hybrid (F 1 ) tetraploid potato offspring. This research used 858 breeding clones for a T 1 trial at Umeå (Norrland, 63°49′30″ N 20°15′50″ E) in 2021, as well as 829 and 671 clones from the breeding population for T 2 trials during 2022 at Umeå and Helgegården (Skåne, 56°01′46″ N 14°09′24″ E), respectively, along with their parents (S 0 ) and check cultivars. The S 1 and F 1 were derived from selfing and crossing four S 0 . The experimental layout was an augmented design of four-plant plots across testing sites, where breeding clones were non-replicated, and the parents and cultivars were placed in all blocks between the former. The genomic prediction abilities (r) for tuber weight per plant were 0.5944 and 0.6776 in T 2 at Helgegården and Umeå, respectively, when T 1 at Umeå was used as the training population. On average, r was larger in inbred than in hybrid offspring at both breeding sites. The r was also estimated using multi-environment data (involving at least one S 1 and one F 1 ) for T 2 performance at both breeding sites. The r was strongly influenced by the genotype in both S 1 and F 1 offspring irrespective of the breeding site.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodomiro Ortiz & Fredrik Reslow & Ramesh Vetukuri & M. Rosario García-Gil & Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez & José Crossa, 2024. "Genomic Prediction for Inbred and Hybrid Polysomic Tetraploid Potato Offspring," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-12, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:455-:d:1354840
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/3/455/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/3/455/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brian R. Cullis & Warwick J. Lill & John A. Fisher & Barbara J. Read & Alan C. Gleeson, 1989. "A New Procedure for the Analysis of Early Generation Variety Trials," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 38(2), pages 361-375, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Donald, Margaret & Alston, Clair L. & Young, Rick R. & Mengersen, Kerrie L., 2011. "A Bayesian analysis of an agricultural field trial with three spatial dimensions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(12), pages 3320-3332, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:455-:d:1354840. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.