IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i12p2185-d1533446.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pathways to Rural Sustainability: Opportunities and Challenges in the Creation of an Agrotechnological District in Ingaí City, Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline Mendonça Nogueira Paiva

    (Faculty of Applied Social Sciences, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras 37203-202, MG, Brazil
    Gammon Presbyterian Faculty, Gammon Presbyterian Institute, Lavras 37200-154, MG, Brazil)

  • Derick David Quintino

    (Faculty of Applied Social Sciences, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras 37203-202, MG, Brazil
    VALORIZA—Research Center for Endogenous Resource Valorization, 7300-555 Portalegre, Portugal)

  • Thacyo Bruno Custódio de Morais

    (Faculty of Applied Social Sciences, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras 37203-202, MG, Brazil)

  • Elisa Guimarães Cozadi

    (Faculty of Applied Social Sciences, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras 37203-202, MG, Brazil)

  • Jaqueline Severino da Costa

    (Department of Agribusiness Management, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras 37203-202, MG, Brazil)

  • Paulo Henrique Montagnana Vicente Leme

    (Faculty of Applied Social Sciences, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras 37203-202, MG, Brazil)

  • José Roberto Soares Scolforo

    (Department of Forest Science, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras 37200-000, MG, Brazil)

Abstract

An agrotechnological district (ATD) integrates sustainable agricultural practices and technologies, aiming to transform rural communities by stimulating socioeconomic development and addressing the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Ingaí, a dairy-producing municipality in Minas Gerais, Brazil, stands to benefit from the implementation of an ATD. This study aimed to identify the opportunities and challenges for the implementation of an ATD in the municipality, considering its socioeconomic characteristics, the level of producers’ technological adoption, connectivity infrastructure, support networks, and rural and market management. The method was based on an exploratory case study, using semi-structured group interviews for data collection, conducted in March 2024, with agricultural stakeholders. As a result, key challenges emerged: limited connectivity infrastructure; ineffective property management; rural family succession problems; barriers in accessing credit; resistance to the adoption of technologies; and dependence on the local government. Opportunities included the strengthening of support networks among the agents of rural productive activity; the promotion of technology adoption by producers; and creating training and rural extension programs. The adoption of these initiatives can stimulate Ingaí’s economic and social development, generate multiplier effects in its region of influence, and serve as a model for other initiatives in the state of Minas Gerais, the main dairy hub in the country, and one of the primary drivers of Brazilian agribusiness.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline Mendonça Nogueira Paiva & Derick David Quintino & Thacyo Bruno Custódio de Morais & Elisa Guimarães Cozadi & Jaqueline Severino da Costa & Paulo Henrique Montagnana Vicente Leme & José Robert, 2024. "Pathways to Rural Sustainability: Opportunities and Challenges in the Creation of an Agrotechnological District in Ingaí City, Brazil," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:2185-:d:1533446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/12/2185/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/12/2185/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ana L. Burgos & Octavio T. Barrera-Perales, 2024. "Attitude toward innovation and its implications for rural community development in Mexican peasant organizations," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(5), pages 689-710, September.
    2. Na Liu & Jingwei Qi & Xiaoping An & Yuan Wang, 2023. "A Review on Information Technologies Applicable to Precision Dairy Farming: Focus on Behavior, Health Monitoring, and the Precise Feeding of Dairy Cows," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-21, September.
    3. Jiajia Meng & Baoyu Zhao & Yuxiao Song & Xiaomei Lin, 2024. "Research on the Spatial Dynamic Evolution of Digital Agriculture—Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Nametshego Gumbi & Lucas Gumbi & Hossana Twinomurinzi, 2023. "Towards Sustainable Digital Agriculture for Smallholder Farmers: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Édson Luis Bolfe & Lúcio André de Castro Jorge & Ieda Del’Arco Sanches & Ariovaldo Luchiari Júnior & Cinthia Cabral da Costa & Daniel de Castro Victoria & Ricardo Yassushi Inamasu & Célia Regina Grego, 2020. "Precision and Digital Agriculture: Adoption of Technologies and Perception of Brazilian Farmers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Paul Diederen & Hans Van Meijl & Arjan Wolters & Katarzyna Bijak, 2003. "Innovation adoption in agriculture : innovators, early adopters and laggards," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 67, pages 29-50.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anastasios Michailidis & Chrysanthi Charatsari & Thomas Bournaris & Efstratios Loizou & Aikaterini Paltaki & Dimitra Lazaridou & Evagelos D. Lioutas, 2024. "A First View on the Competencies and Training Needs of Farmers Working with and Researchers Working on Precision Agriculture Technologies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Brown, Philip & Roper, Simon, 2017. "Innovation and networks in New Zealand farming," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 61(3), July.
    3. Hrosul, Viktoriia & Kruhlova, Olena & Kolesnyk, Alina, 2023. "Digitalization of the agricultural sector: the impact of ICT on the development of enterprises in Ukraine," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(4), December.
    4. Bentivoglio, Deborah & Bucci, Giorgia & Belletti, Matteo & Finco, Adele, 2022. "A theoretical framework on network’s dynamics for precision agriculture technologies adoption," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 60(4), January.
    5. Läpple, Doris & Renwick, Alan & Thorne, Fiona, 2015. "Measuring and understanding the drivers of agricultural innovation: Evidence from Ireland," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1-8.
    6. Beatrice Dingha & Leah Sandler & Arnab Bhowmik & Clement Akotsen-Mensah & Louis Jackai & Kevin Gibson & Ronald Turco, 2019. "Industrial Hemp Knowledge and Interest among North Carolina Organic Farmers in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, May.
    7. Ronaldo Tavares Souza, 2020. "Box-scheme as alternative food network—the economic integration between consumers and producers," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 8(1), pages 1-25, December.
    8. Micheels, Eric T. & Nolan, James F., 2016. "Examining the effects of absorptive capacity and social capital on the adoption of agricultural innovations: A Canadian Prairie case study," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 127-138.
    9. Patricio Vladimir Méndez-Zambrano & Luis Patricio Tierra Pérez & Rogelio Estalin Ureta Valdez & Ángel Patricio Flores Orozco, 2023. "Technological Innovations for Agricultural Production from an Environmental Perspective: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-15, November.
    10. Ivan Bergier & Jayme G. A. Barbedo & Édson L. Bolfe & Luciana A. S. Romani & Ricardo Y. Inamasu & Silvia M. F. S. Massruhá, 2024. "Framing Concepts of Agriculture 5.0 via Bipartite Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-22, December.
    11. Maurício Roberto Cherubin & Júnior Melo Damian & Tiago Rodrigues Tavares & Rodrigo Gonçalves Trevisan & André Freitas Colaço & Mateus Tonini Eitelwein & Maurício Martello & Ricardo Yassushi Inamasu & , 2022. "Precision Agriculture in Brazil: The Trajectory of 25 Years of Scientific Research," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-29, November.
    12. Kariyasa, Ketut & Dewi, Yovita Anggita, 2013. "Analysis Of Factors Affecting Adoption Of Integrated Crop Management Farmer Field School (Icm-Ffs) In Swampy Areas," International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics and Finance, vol. 1(2), pages 1-10, October.
    13. Unay Gailhard, ilkay & Bavorova, Miroslava, 2014. "Innovation at Rural Enterprises: Results from a Survey of German Organic and Conventional Farmers," MPRA Paper 58331, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2022. "Rubber In French Indochina," OSF Preprints yzdp6, Center for Open Science.
    15. Xiaoxu Sun & Zhixiong Lu & Yue Song & Zhun Cheng & Chunxia Jiang & Jin Qian & Yang Lu, 2022. "Development Status and Research Progress of a Tractor Electro-Hydraulic Hitch System," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-20, September.
    16. Ruchie Pathak & Nicholas R. Magliocca, 2022. "Assessing the Representativeness of Irrigation Adoption Studies: A Meta-Study of Global Research," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-31, December.
    17. Sergio Monteleone & Edmilson Alves de Moraes & Roberto Max Protil & Brenno Tondato de Faria & Rodrigo Filev Maia, 2024. "Proposal of a Model of Irrigation Operations Management for Exploring the Factors That Can Affect the Adoption of Precision Agriculture in the Context of Agriculture 4.0," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-33, January.
    18. Kristina Šermukšnytė-Alešiūnienė & Rasa Melnikienė, 2024. "The Effects of Digitalization on the Sustainability of Small Farms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-12, May.
    19. Areal, Francisco J. & Riesgo, Laura & Gómez-Barbero, Manuel & Rodríguez-Cerezo, Emilio, 2012. "Consequences of a coexistence policy on the adoption of GMHT crops in the European Union," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 401-411.
    20. Doris Läpple & Thia Hennessy, 2015. "Exploring the Role of Incentives in Agricultural Extension Programs," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 37(3), pages 403-417.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:2185-:d:1533446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.