Author
Listed:
- Marcin Wegner
(Boehringer-Ingelheim, 00-728 Warsaw, Poland)
- Dariusz Kokoszyński
(Department of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, 85-084 Bydgoszcz, Poland)
- Marek Kotowicz
(Department of Meat Science, Faculty of Food Sciences and Fisheries, West Pomeranian University of Technology, 71-550 Szczecin, Poland)
- Joanna Żochowska-Kujawska
(Department of Meat Science, Faculty of Food Sciences and Fisheries, West Pomeranian University of Technology, 71-550 Szczecin, Poland)
- Arkadiusz Nędzarek
(Department of Aquatic Bioengineering and Aquaculture, Faculty of Food Sciences and Fisheries, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, 71-550 Szczecin, Poland)
- Karol Włodarczyk
(Institute of Agricultural and Food Biotechnology—State Research Institute, 02-532 Warsaw, Poland)
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the quality characteristics of the meat of two genotypes (Lohmann Brown and Lohmann White) of laying hens after the laying period. Studies were conducted on pectoral and leg muscles from 26 females, 13 of each genotype. Breast and leg muscles were evaluated in terms of their basic chemical composition, acidity (pH 24 ), color attributes (L*, a*, b*), electrical conductivity (EC 24 ) and macro- (K, P, Na, Mg, Ca) and microelements (Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn, Cr). Analysis of the texture of the pectoral muscle major and rheological properties (sum of viscosity modules and sum of elasticity modules) was also performed. Breast and leg meat were also subjected to sensory evaluation. The genotype of the birds significantly affected the percentage of intramuscular fat in the pectoral muscle and the percentage of protein, fat and water in the leg muscle. When analyzing pectoral and leg muscles for color attributes, we found no significant ( p > 0.05) differences between genotypes. Differences were shown, however, between genotypes in EC 24 and phosphorus content in leg muscle. Breast muscles differed significantly ( p < 0.05) in iron and zinc content. Sensory analysis revealed significant differences between genotypes in leg muscle tenderness and juiciness, and breast muscle juiciness and aroma desirability. When analyzing the breast muscle in terms of texture, we did not observe any significant differences, nor did we find any differences in the assessment of rheological properties. Not depending on genotype, however, we noted significant differences between protein, fat, water and collagen content, sodium, magnesium, calcium, iron, zinc, copper, manganese, chromium, acidity, color parameters (L*, a*, b*), EC 24 and tastiness desirability between breast meat and leg meat. The results of this study showed that meat from old hens obtained after the laying period is a good material for further technological processing, due to its favorable basic chemical composition and high nutritional value expressed in the content of macro- and microelements, and is also characterized by relatively good sensory characteristics, which can be improved by marinating or adding enzymatic preparations during its processing.
Suggested Citation
Marcin Wegner & Dariusz Kokoszyński & Marek Kotowicz & Joanna Żochowska-Kujawska & Arkadiusz Nędzarek & Karol Włodarczyk, 2023.
"Influence of Genotype on Meat Quality in Laying Hens after the Egg Production Season,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2023:i:1:p:19-:d:1305726
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2023:i:1:p:19-:d:1305726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.